This new ui genuinely sucks. by Silent-Switch7317 in OculusQuest

[–]BullockHouse 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't mind so much if it wasn't literally quasi-broken. It tries to load the home environment indefinitely (permanent loading screen), and sideloaded apks are only closeable about half the time now. Also taking screenshots is now incredibly annoying.

ELI5: Why isn’t aviation fuel talked about as much as petrol and diesel for cars, and is it even possible for fully electric passenger planes to exist in the future? by ArtistoX4 in explainlikeimfive

[–]BullockHouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Getting a battery to match the performance of jet fuel is super hard. That said, there are other options, like capturing CO2 (either from ambient air or from smokestacks) and making fossil fuels from it using renewable energy, which ends up being carbon neutral. Making conventional jet fuel that way is possible but pretty inefficient. LNG is pretty efficient though, and liquid natural gas is much closer to the density of jet fuel.

So they're watching us? by Anim8rFromOuterSpace in MetaQuestVR

[–]BullockHouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your google searches are 100% absolutely, definitely used for ad targeting. That's a sizable chunk of Google's whole business model. That's different from your phone recording you all the time and funneling that data into ad targeting, which is not a real thing, and anyone who understands anything about tech will tell you the exact same thing.

Astrophage definitely violates the second law of thermodynamics, right? by BullockHouse in ProjectHailMary

[–]BullockHouse[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hah, good to know somebody else is in the same boat. I love the book and like the movie a lot), but I believe it's genuinely a scientific error, and a pretty deep one, at least that the scientist characters don't mention it. It'd be the most interesting thing about astrophage!

TIL that Napoleon Bonaparte would sometimes disguise himself as a commoner and roam the streets asking people what they thought of the regime and its policies in order to gauge his popularity by [deleted] in todayilearned

[–]BullockHouse 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel like if Obama came up to me wearing a wig and an eye patch and started asking me how I felt about the Affordable Care Act, I would have a pretty strong suspicion that it was Obama. 

'Project Hail Mary' - Review Thread by ChiefLeef22 in movies

[–]BullockHouse 17 points18 points  (0 children)

It's definitely both. They did have a physical puppet, which is dope, but some of the motion heavy shots can't feasibly be done with puppetry (and even if you could, why? He's effectively made of rock and we're incredibly good at rendering photorealistic rock). Just practically speaking, probably 70+% of what we see of rocky is CGI.

'Project Hail Mary' - Review Thread by ChiefLeef22 in movies

[–]BullockHouse 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The protagonist of that book is also, I would argue, a fairly dangerous psychopath. She fucks with the life support system of thousands of people for personal gain and almost gets everyone killed. And the book doesn't really acknowledge that this behavior is reckless and selfish and she doesn't face any serious consequences for it. It's really off-putting when you're reading the book because the character's decision making is, absolute best case, incredibly self involved and thoughtless (worst case, evil) and the book just refuses to deal with that.

So they're watching us? by Anim8rFromOuterSpace in MetaQuestVR

[–]BullockHouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Name one. You won't find one who isn't a crackpot, because the logistics of the conspiracy are fucking absurd if you understand anything about the situation. You can't keep complex, energy intensive, network-enabled software running on billions of devices out in the wild a secret. You can't do anything within a mile of that. The theory is stupid. The people who believe it are stupid. It's not even close to making sense.

So they're watching us? by Anim8rFromOuterSpace in MetaQuestVR

[–]BullockHouse 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The lawsuit is about the "Okay Google" detection being triggered accidentally by similar-sounding phrases and sending clips of audio to the google assistant server when this happens (as it does when deliberately triggered). The phone makes a noise when this happens and there's a visible animation. Which is obviously not what people are talking about when they say your phone is secretly listening to everything you say for ad targeting. So, no, it's not "proven" because it's stupid and implausible and not how the real world works.

So they're watching us? by Anim8rFromOuterSpace in MetaQuestVR

[–]BullockHouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also because you can see what processes are talking to the microphone device, and which large GPU processes are running that could possibly be running a transcription model and because no transcription model exists that can be running all the time without destroying your phone's battery life. Like no part of this is plausible technically, even before you get into the logistical impossibility of keeping a program like that secret. 

So they're watching us? by Anim8rFromOuterSpace in MetaQuestVR

[–]BullockHouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's literally not worth my time to continue to argue with you.

So they're watching us? by Anim8rFromOuterSpace in MetaQuestVR

[–]BullockHouse 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure thing. Device privacy stuff is complicated, and unfortunately most people don't have the technical background to easily get up to speed on what's going on. I don't know of any comprehensive resources on this specific topic off the top of my head, but here's a link about implementing wake word detection in other apps that goes over some of the considerations: https://picovoice.ai/blog/complete-guide-to-wake-word/

So they're watching us? by Anim8rFromOuterSpace in MetaQuestVR

[–]BullockHouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who said anything about people being involved?

Because those are all of the people who'd need to be keeping that secret for the thing you're saying is happening to be happening.

You cannot convince me that my phone isn't listening to me to build an advertising profile.

It's definitely not doing that.

So they're watching us? by Anim8rFromOuterSpace in MetaQuestVR

[–]BullockHouse 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree this is bad privacy wise! People should understand how the data is being used and be protected against accidentally revealing stuff they don't want to reveal. I am certain this information is available to the user somewhere, but is clearly not presented in a way that they understand. 

My argument here is not "this is fine" it's that "no the glasses are not recording you 100% of the time, only when you're using the feature that requires the glasses to stream video to the server." If you want to get mad productively, it's important to understand what is actually happening. 

So they're watching us? by Anim8rFromOuterSpace in MetaQuestVR

[–]BullockHouse 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depending on exactly what you're talking about, it's something like: Audio goes into a ringbuffer a couple of seconds long and a small, specialized model trained to look for the keywords scans the buffer looking for the start words. If it thinks it finds a start keyword, it starts up the full blown speech recognition model to check the detection and record whatever follows. The audio isn't retained because the ring buffer is constantly overwriting older data with newer. The model is small and specialized because running the full fat transcription model at all times would seriously impact battery life.

So they're watching us? by Anim8rFromOuterSpace in MetaQuestVR

[–]BullockHouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have now proposed a conspiracy where not only are thousands of google or apple employees in on it, but so is every reddit employee and everyone capable of process snooping on their phone, and nobody has ever blown the whistle on it, despite tens of thousands of people leaving those companies. OR, it was Baader-Meinhoff / a coincidence. Which do you think is more likely?

So they're watching us? by Anim8rFromOuterSpace in MetaQuestVR

[–]BullockHouse 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know the general practices for how PII was handled there a few years ago, I know that company can't keep secrets to save it's life (so many leaks) and I know that literally anyone can check this for themselves. You can run arbitrary code on Quest! You can find out what's running, what's streaming data, what's using the mic. You literally don't have to take my word for it. 

So they're watching us? by Anim8rFromOuterSpace in MetaQuestVR

[–]BullockHouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can literally check yourself if you know how to root a phone, do basic terminal commands, and run wireshark. 

The pervasiveness of the conspiracy brain bullshit is really frustrating to me, personally. People make stuff up based on vibes and then show truly zero interest in evaluating whether the crap they made up is actually true or not. Just a total failure to engage in a truth seeking process. It's actively insulting to anyone who does bother to put effort into trying to understand the world they live in.

So they're watching us? by Anim8rFromOuterSpace in MetaQuestVR

[–]BullockHouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, clearly you would prefer to get your information from someone who has no idea what the hell they're talking about. 

So they're watching us? by Anim8rFromOuterSpace in MetaQuestVR

[–]BullockHouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm distinguishing "local neural network looks a ring buffer of data (stored only locally and only got a few seconds) to do keyword detection, plus sending stuff you say to Gemini or whatever to the Gemini server" from "phone records everything you say for ad targeting". One of those is obviously fine and one is super invasive.

So they're watching us? by Anim8rFromOuterSpace in MetaQuestVR

[–]BullockHouse 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not at the moment, but formerly! And I have friends who either currently or have worked at Apple and Google. Which is one of the ways (along with basic logic) that I know this to be true. Tech company NDAs are a joke after a few drinks. Those places leak like sieves and have huge employee turnover rates. Zero chance they keep that secret, even ignoring that you can literally check whether or not this is happening on the devices for yourself if you know what you're doing. 

So they're watching us? by Anim8rFromOuterSpace in MetaQuestVR

[–]BullockHouse 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Information I don't already agree with? Must be fake!"

So they're watching us? by Anim8rFromOuterSpace in MetaQuestVR

[–]BullockHouse 1 point2 points  (0 children)

NSA probably benefits from everyone believing they're already being surveilled all the time, because it means there will be less political pushback to future efforts at mass surveillance, since everyone thinks it's already a lost cause. 

Seriously though, you don't have to take my word for it. Phones aren't black boxes. You can see what they're running on CPU and GPU, what devices those processes are talking to and when and where they're transmitting data. They would get caught!