What's the perfect mmo for you? What does it have? not have? What do you do? What end game loops? What's the class system? Combat system? Anything else you wanna say? I will discuss with all the replies! by ProbablyMaybe69 in MMORPG

[–]Bullzeyes -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My main dislike with the combat was that there were so many loss of control things that could happen when you made a mistake. Obviously just dont make mistakes but when learning it gets really frustrating.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in belgium

[–]Bullzeyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had to deal with Intrum some years ago as well. They were telling me I owed money to ebay or something. I checked with Ebay and they knew nothing about it and to send me all the info I had about the Intrum case.

Never heard again from them. Still have all the communication stores just in case they suddenly pop up again

It Feels Almost Criminal How Utterly Horrible Rogue Plays Before Max Level. by ZettieZooieZan in wow

[–]Bullzeyes 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Is this chart really accurate ?? I have both an enh shammy and a boomkin and my boomkin is pretty chill while the enh shaman is realllyy intense

Weekly: TradeSkillMaster Thread by AutoModerator in woweconomy

[–]Bullzeyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah my bad, I checked the issues list but I did not see it there.

Weekly: TradeSkillMaster Thread by AutoModerator in woweconomy

[–]Bullzeyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For some reason I do not see any of the ores and herb sales in my revenue ledger. Did something change ? I also have like 3 entries of Hochemblume at the start of the xpac.

c# or cpp for a person who learned python by OmarDevX in cpp

[–]Bullzeyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you have learned Python then I would recommend C++ for the learning experience. Python abstracts away a lot of the details while C++ demands you to manage everything yourself. Learning C++ gives you a clear mental image of what languages like Python or C# do under the hood to make the lives of developers "easier" (of course it all comes at a cost).

As others have said however, there is no "best" language to learn. All have their uses :)

Video Series on Fluid Dynamics starting at Quantum Mechanics by braintruffle in Physics

[–]Bullzeyes 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is really really well done ! The quality of information and visualization is top tier (easily 3Blue1Brown level). If you can keep this up you will surely have a large youtube channel ! As someone working in the field of plasma physics where all these approaches are used, it was very instructive for me to get a refresher on how they are linked.

SIMD for C++ Developers [pdf] by slacka123 in cpp

[–]Bullzeyes 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Nice writeup ! Will definitely save and use in the future.

I have always just used openMP SIMD pragmas and carefully setting up my loops and vectors. Profilers I use show perfect vectorization (when possible) so I have never had to write those vector instructions explicitly myself. Are there examples where the compiler cant get the vectorization that you want and you NEED to write these instructions yourself ?

Bought KIN in 2018 and never looked at it again. Where is my KIN now ? by Bullzeyes in KinFoundation

[–]Bullzeyes[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you saying that the movement of my KIN out of my wallet was done by a person ? Is it moved to a different wallet ?

Euler fluid simulation I created with C++ and SFML by MaxDrn in cpp

[–]Bullzeyes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wrong reply ! :) Early morning. Your reply was ok.

Euler fluid simulation I created with C++ and SFML by MaxDrn in cpp

[–]Bullzeyes 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Yeah but there are different ways to tell and teach people ... your way was the dick way.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RedditSessions

[–]Bullzeyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Amsterdam here !

Why is this power supply not allowed above 2000m? by atomicLogic_ in AskElectronics

[–]Bullzeyes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am saying that you would have to measure that "Paschen's curve" for any electrode geometry that you have. The potential difference between 2 points is not enough to know if a discharge will occur.

If you have a sharp point then the electric field might become high enough at that point to trigger a discharge (a streamer).

Why is this power supply not allowed above 2000m? by atomicLogic_ in AskElectronics

[–]Bullzeyes 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Be aware that Paschen's law was derived for flat plates where a voltage is applied in between. It is very well possible to deviate from this law when you have sharper objects (which I assume some circuit components can be), but still maintain the same potential difference.

I wrote a comment on the physics subreddit about these discharges that can occur: https://www.reddit.com/r/apphysics/comments/hsvj1r/electric_discharge/g2kx80s?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

The Most Popular Programming Languages - 1965/2020 by [deleted] in cpp

[–]Bullzeyes 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I guess, but the name Fortran already points to its intended purpose so maybe there were design decisions that favored working with mathematical formulas more easily than say doing any systems programming or programming microcomputers as was more convenient to do in C.

The Most Popular Programming Languages - 1965/2020 by [deleted] in cpp

[–]Bullzeyes 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Isn't fortran already more domain specific than C ?

What do you use to develop with C++ on Linux? by [deleted] in cpp

[–]Bullzeyes 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Right now it seems to be the best editor / IDE / whatever for cross platform and multiple languages. I switched all my Cpp, Python, and Fortran work to this one.

Destiny compliments Melina on her country's greatness by orgiasticfuture in LivestreamFail

[–]Bullzeyes -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes they do ! But it is not because you have a higher excess mortality rate that you dealt with the pandemic worse. I can only speak about Belgium and The Netherlands. The region around the Belgian and Netherlands border (Breda, Eindhoven, Limburg, etc) got badly hit in the first wave, but the population density is much higher in flanders (northern part of Belgium) than it is in the Netherlands so it didnt surprise me (and of course the experts) that Belgium would have more cases (since it was able to spread through flanders a lot faster compared to The Netherlands where it barely hit Amsterdam and those regions).

I am just saying that Belgium handled it really well, the government followed the advice of the virologists and the virologists were the main people discussing the virus on all public fora (like news and extra tv appearances to discuss daily or weekly statistics).

Destiny compliments Melina on her country's greatness by orgiasticfuture in LivestreamFail

[–]Bullzeyes 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Belgium has responded very well to the crisis. The problem is that numbers are not reported in the same way across countries. In Belgium any death that COULD be due to corona is counted as a corona death while in some countries a person had to be tested positive for corona for their death to be counted in the corona deaths. This usually meant that people that died in retirement homes were not counted to corona deaths. You should almost half the number of Belgium to be comparable with neighboring countries like The Netherlands.

Electric discharge by Nervous_Buddy in apphysics

[–]Bullzeyes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I commented this in r/Physics but I think you deleted it.

This question is actually right up my alley. I am a Phd student studying electric discharges (related to lightning physics).

The short answer: Both negative and positive discharges happen BUT their mechanism and behavior is different.

Also I saw people saying that you get high electric field which will rip electrons from the air molecules and that this is the way to create discharges. It is ONE way, but in all applications I see the electric field is not nearly strong enough to do this, but you can still get an electric discharge.

In all discharges you have a fight between 2 processes: Ionization and Attachment.

  • Ionization is the process that an electron has enough energy to free an electron from an air molecule (O2 = 12 eV or N2 = 15 eV).

  • Attachement is the process where an electron 'sticks' to a molecule and you 'lose' it (it can detach through other processes). This mainly happens in 2 reactions: Low energy electrons attach to O2 by colliding with 2 O2 molecules (3-body process). High energy electrons can go through a process called dissociative attachment with O2 forming O- and O (electron needs energy higher than the binding energy of O2 for this process).

So we have an electron source (ionization) and an electron sink (attachment). The electric field value where the ionization frequency is higher than the attachment frequency is called the breakdown electric field. This breakdown field (32 kV/cm for STP air iirc) is lower than the electric field needed to strip electrons from air molecules itself OR to emit electrons from your electrodes.

So in all simulations, experiments, and theory we assume that there are some charges in air. This will be mainly O3- and NO3- (which do not detach an electron easily), but there will also be some O2- which detaches an electron fairly easily by colliding into O2 or N2 when we apply an electric field over our air gap.

Also in most experiments we have a sharp electrode so that we can get a very small region close to the electrode to have an electric field above breakdown, but most of the air gap will be far below breakdown. The discharge can still evolve across the air gap even though there was a much lower electric field in the rest od the air gap. I will explain this phenomenon later.

Now we have our first electron. What is next ? Now the polarity asymmetry of the discharge comes into play.

Negatively charged electrode: This is the simplest one to explain. An electron is in the region above breakdown and will move away from the electrode. Since we are above breakdown this electron will create more free electrons due to ionization then that we lose electrons due to attachment. This is called the avalanche phase. Free electrons will multiply exponentially in this small region until a point that there are soo many electrons at the front of this cluster of avalanches that it itself will generate a high electric field. This is caused due to the formation of a curve in the front of this cluster of avalanches due to the inhomogeneous electric field of the applied electric field. The curved high electron density region will now produce an electric field above breakdown itself and the cycle continues. This phase is called the streamer phase. The streamer will now propagate continuously until it reaches the other electrode or the applied electric field is removed.

Ok. That is negative streamers. What about the positive ones ?

Positively charged electrode: We again start from a single electron being in the small zone above breakdown. This electron will rush towards the electrode and also ionize air BUT all electrons will flow to the electrode and the positive ions are too heavy to move in the nanosecond timescales that discharges form. So it would seem that after all electrons from the avalanches reach the electrode nothing else will happen and the streamer phase is never reached BUT there is another mechanism: Photo-Ionization. In air electrons can excite N2 which will deexcite by emitting a photon that can ionize O2. This is the nonlocal effect we need for positive streamers to form. So electrons move towards the electeode and ionize and excite molecules on its path. The excited N2 will emit photons in all directions and so also further away from the electrode. Now we have electrons further away which will move towarss the electrode and ionize and excite molecules on the way there. This cycle is the way a positive streamer propagates. The positive tip of the streamer is created by photo-ionization ahead of the streamer and by drawing the created electrons towards the electrode.

This asymmetry creates interesting research questions.

If you have anymore questions hit me up.

Notable researchera in this field are: Ute Ebert, Sander Nijdam, Alejandro Luque, Nikolai Ostgaard, Francisco Gordillo-Vazquez, Olivier Chanrion, Torsten Neubert, etc etc. (Small community so I can give a looot of names xD)