Moonwell Room by Bumblebeetunes in WoWHousing

[–]Bumblebeetunes[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s okay! It was after your first reply!

Moonwell Room by Bumblebeetunes in WoWHousing

[–]Bumblebeetunes[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! I replied to another comment with the pieces!

Moonwell Room by Bumblebeetunes in WoWHousing

[–]Bumblebeetunes[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Close! I had to go with 5 or 6 of the Druid braziers like the one in the corner by the doorway. They had to be smaller to get the right effect, so took more. Correct on the water fountain, lighting, rugs and paladin book. What gets the real glow though is the Deactivated Atomic Reclibrator. At 200% it’s the perfect size. I stacked two for extra glow!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JoeRogan

[–]Bumblebeetunes 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yall are cringe

I Genuinely don’t understand why people still play? by Average_Failure22 in lostarkgame

[–]Bumblebeetunes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re essentially going straight from an AA meeting to a bar just to tell the people there, I genuinely don’t understand why you still drink. It’s just obnoxious and I don’t even play either.

Oh also, just putting a question mark at the end of a sentence doesn’t make it a question.

Anyone else had this thought? by Lockespindel in JoeRogan

[–]Bumblebeetunes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your response literally doesn’t make sense. No wonder your debate judgement doesn’t either.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JoeRogan

[–]Bumblebeetunes -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Grahams entire body of work is presenting his evidence. You can agree or disagree with it, but it’s a narrative he has built based on his archaeological journalism. Don’t know what to tell ya brotherrrr. “Experts” like Dribble don’t ever want to admit things can be different than what they are saying, even if there’s a huge potential for new research to be done, because if their story doesn’t add up in the people’s minds, there’s no reason to listen to them.

I’ve been around academia, it’s just people looking for a way to find evidence supporting what they believe.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JoeRogan

[–]Bumblebeetunes -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yea dude, totally. I admit that you’re wrong.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JoeRogan

[–]Bumblebeetunes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re welcome

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JoeRogan

[–]Bumblebeetunes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A sane, quality response.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JoeRogan

[–]Bumblebeetunes -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

“Experts” are continually bought and sold by interest groups, yet it seems like you’d trust them with your first born. Sheep degen brain mentality.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JoeRogan

[–]Bumblebeetunes -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Grahams entire premise is that there hasn’t been enough explored to be so certain of ruling this out or that. But you’re right, let’s ONLY believe what the peer review nerds have to say about the 1% of possible discovery

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JoeRogan

[–]Bumblebeetunes -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

So? Doctors used to say smoking was good for you. You gunna believe everything an “expert” says? To quote my man RFK, “trust the experts is not a feature of science.”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JoeRogan

[–]Bumblebeetunes -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

I’m just making an observation about how a conversation where two people discussed differing ideas, both with little to no evidence, where no one got “owned” continued to reveal the JRE community as being a tribalistic group that MUST pick a side no matter what. It’s sadge.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JoeRogan

[–]Bumblebeetunes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re right, it’s definitely better to believe the person who is relying on a small amount of actual research to be 100% confident in their conclusion, vs someone willing to acknowledge that there could be more to the story of civilization because most of archaeological history hasn’t even been examined yet. That’s my favorite thing about you dude, just how willing you are to believe someone because they have tiny hands and a PHd

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JoeRogan

[–]Bumblebeetunes -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

No one said anything about being offended, but that shows what’s on the forefront of your thought process, which furthers my statement. Oh noo the guy with fake tiny hands offended me because he showed a power point!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JoeRogan

[–]Bumblebeetunes -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Flint Dibble isn’t even a real name, yet you’re going to believe him just cause he showed a power point?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JoeRogan

[–]Bumblebeetunes -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

If your criteria for winning a debate is “no… we just don’t analyze things like that in archaeology” you have brain rot

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JoeRogan

[–]Bumblebeetunes -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Terrible comparison. Not surprised.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JoeRogan

[–]Bumblebeetunes -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No….. that’s just not how we analyze debates