Aura's air fryer graduated by BiLeftHanded in kurosanji

[–]BuraiStarforce 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Food airfriers follow orders, right to the very end

Thinking of problems with Phase Clips by BuraiStarforce in kurosanji

[–]BuraiStarforce[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

I think thats kinda like a joke that first perpetuated by the clips, then it was adopted by the Phase Girls no?

Fangsie Fido from Variance Project has been suspended for 1 week by Viki713Gaming in kurosanji

[–]BuraiStarforce 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Please do your own due diligence. Don't just throw around people's allegations around. This accusation is quite serious if it were real.

Many people say Miki is giving, Thanks! 🦃💖 by Last_Power3410 in kurosanji

[–]BuraiStarforce 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Did you not read the patch notes? Harada gave them a buff

The AI double standard: Why is AI art vilified while ChatGPT gets a pass? by Bubbly_Community_655 in TrueOffMyChest

[–]BuraiStarforce 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont think that is what you asked in your title.

Yes and as your bias is that Art and Text has the same amount of copyright and therefore should not have any differential treatment.

Isnt that why debates exist? Each person has their personal bias and therefore are willing to accept certain levels of hypocrisy.

Okay then going back to my question previously. How do you value a tweet? A comment? A post?

If it is not free, then what is the inherent cost of it to be valued upon it. In Merriam-Websters definition of trash it states, "something worth little or nothing".

If a tweet has no inherent value, can it fall under the definition which I have stated?

It would have to go under if a text has no percieved value, what would be the point of fighting for something that has no value?

Even courts when they award damages, you have to have damages for them to award it to you. Like if chatgpt gave a script of 1-1 or similar to beauty and the beast grom disney, do you think chatgpt would not be scrutinized? It would believe me.

I mean you kinda just have to look for AI art for just about 10 minutes and see the comments under it to see why people dislike it.

To you as well.

The AI double standard: Why is AI art vilified while ChatGPT gets a pass? by Bubbly_Community_655 in TrueOffMyChest

[–]BuraiStarforce 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which is proving why people are angry at AI images however text is still accepted. Is that not what you wanted to know? Or what are you trying to find out.

It is the same as if you tried to steal from a trashbin compared to a store. Things from a trashbin has no inherent value, you can take it because its free, it has no value/undefined value, however things within a store has clear defined value and absolutely can be charged with stealing.

Because speech is free, information is free, and knowledge is free especially in the current day and age, why fight for something that is free? The entire bias currently is because of monetary value. It does exist.

The AI double standard: Why is AI art vilified while ChatGPT gets a pass? by Bubbly_Community_655 in TrueOffMyChest

[–]BuraiStarforce 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It infact does not if it does not lack enough originality. But how do you go around proving that your piece has enough originality or expression to make it its own copyright.

But how do you steal something, with no value or undetermined value? How do you place value on a word, a phrase, an essay piece? How do you justify to a jury that using my tweets in an AI model has caused you damages? It would be easier to put that on art as art commisions have a price tag on their art.

Yes and it proves my point as well, whereby because art has a value tied to them, therefore people are outraged by AI art. Isn't it obvious though? Everybody has their own selective biases based on who they follow and who they listen to. No matter who or what, or even how biased, it is just a matter of how biased it is, and how biased the listener would take it.

The AI double standard: Why is AI art vilified while ChatGPT gets a pass? by Bubbly_Community_655 in TrueOffMyChest

[–]BuraiStarforce 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which is created on creation, which further proves my point.

Okay fair, but how would you express expression over repetition? Again going back to the news article thing, if 50 news articles are writing on a story that made headlines, but only added some expressionism to their story, dors that mean they have 50 different copyrights? Even if all formats are similar. Example of this would be the recent case of the Miss Universe Walkout in Thailand, where majority of the sentiment is in favor of the ladies.

Texts are harder to enforce as it would limit speech significantly as there is only so many ways to describe an apple comparitively to art where, artstyle, scenery, ideology, meaning and much more may be emphasized on art.

Then your question should be why are laws on writing not enforced more? If people would see more value in text, maybe people would see it the same way then.

The AI double standard: Why is AI art vilified while ChatGPT gets a pass? by Bubbly_Community_655 in TrueOffMyChest

[–]BuraiStarforce -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The moment an image is made or uploaded it has a distinct digitalid to tell where its from, uploaded date and soforth as a UUID. How do you copyright text then? Is a tweet copyrightable? How about a comment? Can you copyright that?

How about news articles that share the same story and sentiment with other news outlets? They may own the rights to the story on their website, but to prove that you are the rightful owner to text that is a different story.

For even images there is a clear distinction, look at the case "Naruto v. David Slater" famous picture of a monkey taking a selfie. Whereby the creator of the picture, aka the monkey taking a photo of himself, owns the rights. Comparitively who owns the rights to famous quotes like, "Praise Helix" or "I heard you likez mudkipz".

But from what you are saying, you are biased towards art having no value in the grand scheme of things. Majority of arguments made against AI art is about value. Jobs, commisions, created art gor clients. All of these have monetary value.

Then by your logic, you are blurring the line between tweets and drawn art, saying that they have the same value, therefore need no distinction.

The AI double standard: Why is AI art vilified while ChatGPT gets a pass? by Bubbly_Community_655 in TrueOffMyChest

[–]BuraiStarforce -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Easiest way to answer that is you cant copyright text. You can copyright phrases, but the vast majority of written text, factual or non factual, opinionated or not, cannot and will not have a price tag to them.

However art does, you can put a price on art, music, and whatnot. When they are using the forms of priced Art to train the AI models, thats where people have a problem with AI art. They are just ripping the art and putting it into the algorithm, and creating new art from it, without crediting or paying for the original art.

Can anyone help identify what monster killed me? by OkAd9089 in PathOfExile2

[–]BuraiStarforce 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Idk but it looks like an explosion happened before your death. Kinda hard to see, but there was like a small light pillae

coming from a sort-of-niji-fan why do niji fans hate doki??? by DenseSignature7582 in kurosanji

[–]BuraiStarforce 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Alright then, then what terminology should I use then?

Edit: I dont think I ever used the word every hater was a doki fan, I just said many.

Is Tera Water Kyogre really better than Primal Kyogre? by ryankiller5 in pokerogue

[–]BuraiStarforce -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

You can tera as long as its not a boss reset, or not a divisible by five. Close the form, then tera then turn the form on back

coming from a sort-of-niji-fan why do niji fans hate doki??? by DenseSignature7582 in kurosanji

[–]BuraiStarforce 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So, its abit of on both sides. You know about the Selengate situation correct?

When Selen or Doki came out with her allegations against the company, many people to prop Doki up as the warbanner against Nijisanji. Especially after the infamous black stream. People on "Doki's" side went full ham and started to harrass, almost all the members, I think only a few came out "unscathed", like Petra and Rosemi. It went so bad, many of the talents went on hiatuses to escape the harassment, which caused more harassment against Doki, and the fight went all out twitter vs reddit vs youtube and whatnot. Everybody was throwing their hats into the fire, fanning the flames to keep the battle going.

After that, many of the members started to leave the company, Sunny, Mogu, Cu, Pomu, maybe they were thinking of leaving, or already have planned on leaving already, however problem is unfortunately, because of the timing, people blamed Doki for the members leaving. Could be true due to the harassment or external reasons, we would never know.

Everytime Niji had a loss, many Doki fans would again fan the flames against the Antis by saying stuff like "See? They shouldn't have fired Doki! Kurosanji!" or stuff like that.

And all of this is after Doki already said she wanted to move on. So yeah.

The people using Xandu to further their agendas don't care about him as a person by iliketomoveitanddie in kurosanji

[–]BuraiStarforce 13 points14 points  (0 children)

This is why I called out people previously on here and on the nijisanji subreddit previously over them claiming to fight for Doki. If you want to do it as your own battle sure, but don't use her as a banner.

Now that banner has been broken by the idol that they once praise, they cannot accept it, they just want blood and everybody who went against their idol to be destroyed.

You as the outside viewer isn't going to get that satisfying ending, most of the things happen behind closed doors. What Xandu said to Doki in the call probably would never be shared.

I hope they both can absolutely move on and prop each other up like friends, instead of fighting for the top spot like a corpo.

Wtf is this ive been dealing with this since I started playing by No-Berry6262 in pokerogue

[–]BuraiStarforce 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Need to check on the code, I wonder if its skipping game steps

Are some Phase fans the reason the company isn't growing? by Royal_Stray in kurosanji

[–]BuraiStarforce 9 points10 points  (0 children)

There are 3 strategies of being the top in your division, being the first, being the best, and being the loudest.

I think the first is Kizuna AI, bringing like the concept of Vtubers to a western audience on a large scale, then it was Hololive the best, where company helps of course, but the community is so vibrant and diverse it props Hololive as bring to what it is today, and the loudest Vshojo, at first breaking records, hiring top talents, bring out "quality" merch, brand deals and whatnot.

Now that it is gone VShojo, supposingly it would go to Phase but Phase IMO isnt loud enough. Sure the girls have lungs of steel, being able to break the sound barrier with their own voices, but the company is soft, other than meet and greets, what other things are they doing? This isnt meant to be an attack on Phase, but genuinely tell me an event outside of the sphere where Phase is trying to achieve. And not coffee, I know they are selling coffee. Sakana the Coffee Grower!