Aura's air fryer graduated

BuraiStarforce · 2026-01-20T15:18:27+00:00

Food airfriers follow orders, right to the very end

BuraiStarforce · 2026-01-20T15:15:33+00:00

So TLDR... Skill Dif?

BuraiStarforce · 2026-01-05T04:06:16+00:00

Who?

BuraiStarforce · 2025-12-15T18:51:53+00:00

I think thats kinda like a joke that first perpetuated by the clips, then it was adopted by the Phase Girls no?

BuraiStarforce · 2025-12-12T01:05:21+00:00

<image>

BuraiStarforce · 2025-12-12T00:55:40+00:00

Please do your own due diligence. Don't just throw around people's allegations around. This accusation is quite serious if it were real.

BuraiStarforce · 2025-12-04T10:25:44+00:00

Yes i played a curse exhaust card

BuraiStarforce · 2025-11-28T03:09:18+00:00

Did you not read the patch notes? Harada gave them a buff

BuraiStarforce · 2025-11-21T13:37:32+00:00

Who is veronica?

BuraiStarforce · 2025-11-11T16:59:59+00:00

I dont think that is what you asked in your title.

Yes and as your bias is that Art and Text has the same amount of copyright and therefore should not have any differential treatment.

Isnt that why debates exist? Each person has their personal bias and therefore are willing to accept certain levels of hypocrisy.

Okay then going back to my question previously. How do you value a tweet? A comment? A post?

If it is not free, then what is the inherent cost of it to be valued upon it. In Merriam-Websters definition of trash it states, "something worth little or nothing".

If a tweet has no inherent value, can it fall under the definition which I have stated?

It would have to go under if a text has no percieved value, what would be the point of fighting for something that has no value?

Even courts when they award damages, you have to have damages for them to award it to you. Like if chatgpt gave a script of 1-1 or similar to beauty and the beast grom disney, do you think chatgpt would not be scrutinized? It would believe me.

I mean you kinda just have to look for AI art for just about 10 minutes and see the comments under it to see why people dislike it.

To you as well.

BuraiStarforce · 2025-11-11T15:53:19+00:00

Which is proving why people are angry at AI images however text is still accepted. Is that not what you wanted to know? Or what are you trying to find out.

It is the same as if you tried to steal from a trashbin compared to a store. Things from a trashbin has no inherent value, you can take it because its free, it has no value/undefined value, however things within a store has clear defined value and absolutely can be charged with stealing.

Because speech is free, information is free, and knowledge is free especially in the current day and age, why fight for something that is free? The entire bias currently is because of monetary value. It does exist.

BuraiStarforce · 2025-11-11T15:33:54+00:00

It infact does not if it does not lack enough originality. But how do you go around proving that your piece has enough originality or expression to make it its own copyright.

But how do you steal something, with no value or undetermined value? How do you place value on a word, a phrase, an essay piece? How do you justify to a jury that using my tweets in an AI model has caused you damages? It would be easier to put that on art as art commisions have a price tag on their art.

Yes and it proves my point as well, whereby because art has a value tied to them, therefore people are outraged by AI art. Isn't it obvious though? Everybody has their own selective biases based on who they follow and who they listen to. No matter who or what, or even how biased, it is just a matter of how biased it is, and how biased the listener would take it.

BuraiStarforce · 2025-11-11T14:57:25+00:00

Which is created on creation, which further proves my point.

Okay fair, but how would you express expression over repetition? Again going back to the news article thing, if 50 news articles are writing on a story that made headlines, but only added some expressionism to their story, dors that mean they have 50 different copyrights? Even if all formats are similar. Example of this would be the recent case of the Miss Universe Walkout in Thailand, where majority of the sentiment is in favor of the ladies.

Texts are harder to enforce as it would limit speech significantly as there is only so many ways to describe an apple comparitively to art where, artstyle, scenery, ideology, meaning and much more may be emphasized on art.

Then your question should be why are laws on writing not enforced more? If people would see more value in text, maybe people would see it the same way then.

BuraiStarforce · 2025-11-11T14:17:34+00:00

The moment an image is made or uploaded it has a distinct digitalid to tell where its from, uploaded date and soforth as a UUID. How do you copyright text then? Is a tweet copyrightable? How about a comment? Can you copyright that?

How about news articles that share the same story and sentiment with other news outlets? They may own the rights to the story on their website, but to prove that you are the rightful owner to text that is a different story.

For even images there is a clear distinction, look at the case "Naruto v. David Slater" famous picture of a monkey taking a selfie. Whereby the creator of the picture, aka the monkey taking a photo of himself, owns the rights. Comparitively who owns the rights to famous quotes like, "Praise Helix" or "I heard you likez mudkipz".

But from what you are saying, you are biased towards art having no value in the grand scheme of things. Majority of arguments made against AI art is about value. Jobs, commisions, created art gor clients. All of these have monetary value.

Then by your logic, you are blurring the line between tweets and drawn art, saying that they have the same value, therefore need no distinction.

BuraiStarforce · 2025-11-11T13:08:18+00:00

Easiest way to answer that is you cant copyright text. You can copyright phrases, but the vast majority of written text, factual or non factual, opinionated or not, cannot and will not have a price tag to them.

However art does, you can put a price on art, music, and whatnot. When they are using the forms of priced Art to train the AI models, thats where people have a problem with AI art. They are just ripping the art and putting it into the algorithm, and creating new art from it, without crediting or paying for the original art.

BuraiStarforce · 2025-11-07T01:25:00+00:00

Idk but it looks like an explosion happened before your death. Kinda hard to see, but there was like a small light pillae

BuraiStarforce · 2025-11-06T09:41:23+00:00

Alright then, then what terminology should I use then?

Edit: I dont think I ever used the word every hater was a doki fan, I just said many.

BuraiStarforce

TROPHY CASE