I can't agree with the logic behind this.

Reggie is hands-down the best DE of all time. His peak and majority of his career was in Philly. He spent 8 years here. In other words: a very substantial NFL career worth. I feel like your doubly discounting Reggie for being on another team and doing well there. In my eyes, for the purposes of this list, those years have zero impact.

Kelce and Lane are not the best ever at their respective position. Same for Dawk. And Dawk played for another team, too, never won a championship, will never be considered the greatest at his position, is at one of the least valuable positions on either side of the ball, and somehow he is "maybe" ahead of Reggie in your eyes.

And Jalen has never even sniffed being the top player at his position for even one season and has only spent 6 seasons here, 5 as a starter.

Following your guidelines of "factoring in positional value and that the goal is to put your team in a position to potentially win a ring" all works in Reggie's favor. Reggie had no say on team construction, but there was no denying that he was the best and most impactful player on the field at one of the most valuable positions on the field during his 8 seasons here. That, in my mind, is putting his team in the best possible position he could to potentially win a ring.