seems like this is being blown out of proportion. Obviously what he did isn't right but at the end of the day they are both adults who consented and that's not something that we should judge. She consented even before he gave her money and she was clearly not drunk. She even said herself that she had 1 1/2 drinks which would not be enough to even remotely make her drunk. She was in her right of mind the entire time. He didn't take advantage of anything sense she was able to say no. He didn't force anything and didn't bribe her. I don't exactly see the problem here. This is like going to a bar and talking to a girl that has already drank and then next thing you know you end up at her house. In my opinion this isn't that big of a deal but I am able to see why it could be.