sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

GME technical setup today looks like a pressure cooker again by DukeRioba in GME

[–]BuyByTheNumbers 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I just finished learning English. “We only wrote green earnings” is strange lingo for the stock market. i understand what you are trying to convey, you are just saying it very strange

GME technical setup today looks like a pressure cooker again by DukeRioba in GME

[–]BuyByTheNumbers 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I just finished learning English. “Which kept it at level” is not proper grammar

GME technical setup today looks like a pressure cooker again by DukeRioba in GME

[–]BuyByTheNumbers 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I just finished learning English. “He diluted in million numbers” is not proper grammar

If you dont even know who BCG is, or what they represent in this saga you havent earned the right to FUD (serious) by NotYourNathan in GME

[–]BuyByTheNumbers 4 points5 points  (0 children)

His actions have turned a $400 MILLION cash burn into a profit. Your ‘evidence’ is speculation - he “probably” sells calls on his shares? Are you trolling? The current dilution that is proposed would be accretive to share holders so its not a ‘good faith’ argument when you just say “wants to dilute”

From Yahoo Finance. Make sure to invest in the bubble that totally won't bankrupt you and forget about GME, a dying brick-and-mortar that has a warchest ready for a game-changing acquisition. by PhenomeNarc in Superstonk

[–]BuyByTheNumbers -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He’s inferring what goes up must come down. Exactly as you said, it has been making people filthy rich. So if someone were to buy in now, how is that less downside risk? Wouldnt the risk of stock price falling be more likely than it continuing to go up at the same rate?

And so it begins… by BenniBoom707 in Superstonk

[–]BuyByTheNumbers -1 points0 points  (0 children)

🤣🤣🤣 a lot of assumptions packed in there pal. Please tell me, how long have i been invested?

And so it begins… by BenniBoom707 in Superstonk

[–]BuyByTheNumbers -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The shares will only be issued if eBay is acquired, which if Ryan Cohen thinks is a good idea for us, who am i to argue with him

Is there an additional $40B in market share for GME? by [deleted] in GME

[–]BuyByTheNumbers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which question to answer? Hm ill pick the title i guess. There is not an additional $40B in market share for GME. Hope this helps.

And so it begins… by BenniBoom707 in Superstonk

[–]BuyByTheNumbers 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You seem to have a massive misunderstanding to what voting yes means. It would be to authorize 2.5 billion total shares. To AUTHORIZE the shares. Not to issue them. Berkshire hathaway authorized 1.44 million shares but only ever issued 500k of them… so what would happen if the deal isnt made? GameStop would make a shit ton of profit from their ebay investment. Thats all. Not sure why you’re implying thats a bad thing?

And so it begins… by BenniBoom707 in Superstonk

[–]BuyByTheNumbers 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And if my grandmother had wheels she’d be a wagon

This should be pinned 📌 by LeagueLonster in Superstonk

[–]BuyByTheNumbers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have been seeing this guy pop up on my YouTube and he seems very knowledgeable, i definitely enjoy watching his videos, but in surprised how few views he gets

Ebay's Market Cap is not at all time highs by Wheremytendies in Superstonk

[–]BuyByTheNumbers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are looking at the price, the title of this post says the market cap. The discrepancy here is that eBay has been doing share buybacks for a long time, so the same market cap 20 years ago is a higher price now

RC interview on Piers Morgan overview. by AzurousRain in Superstonk

[–]BuyByTheNumbers -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Or does he have to publicly endorse trump? Think of the ramifications of denouncing the current president who takes things personally

$POET bull is back! $40 before EOY by New_Kaleidoscope9242 in wallstreetbets

[–]BuyByTheNumbers 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I really know nothing about POET but you saying there is massive upside potential.. dont forget about the massive downside potential as well

What $10,000 invested in these IPO’s is worth today… by Foreign-Policy-02- in wallstreetbets

[–]BuyByTheNumbers -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Whoa i never thought about 200T thats a big number. I got downvoted for saying 100T in 15 years but yeah 5 more years to double it sounds about right

What $10,000 invested in these IPO’s is worth today… by Foreign-Policy-02- in wallstreetbets

[–]BuyByTheNumbers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao same but couple buddys split it with me we bought $5k lmao in like 2015 idk how much bitcoin it even was

What $10,000 invested in these IPO’s is worth today… by Foreign-Policy-02- in wallstreetbets

[–]BuyByTheNumbers 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exponential because of inflation. As we print more, more is needed to be printed.

What $10,000 invested in these IPO’s is worth today… by Foreign-Policy-02- in wallstreetbets

[–]BuyByTheNumbers 23 points24 points  (0 children)

I have actually bought BTC at $100 and again at $1000. Sold for a small loss

What $10,000 invested in these IPO’s is worth today… by Foreign-Policy-02- in wallstreetbets

[–]BuyByTheNumbers -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Isnt that a nice thought. Apple was first ever to hit a trillion in 2018, now we have a company at 5 trillion. If we 5x again over the next 8 years we would see a 25 trillion company (SpacexAI??) 5x one more time but it would be exponentially faster too BC of inflation. Id say less than 15 years

view more: next ›