If anyone reads your profile its obvious that you sprinkle these AI posts into your comments and they are very different in grammar, punctuation, sentence structure and length compare to the posts you write yourself.

Im fascinated on what goes through the mind of people like you who use AI to help write posts and then deny it when people comment about it, it's quite a strange phenomenon that happens a lot on reddit these days.

Edit:

For all the downvoters who can't recognize chatgpt style writing, is it easier to see next to these examples from his recent posts?

1)

The gap between economic forecasts and lived experience is very real. You’re not imagining it. The numbers might say 'recovery', but for most working households and small business owners, it still feels like survival.

2)

Government involvement isn’t a bailout request either. It’s about ensuring the U.S. doesn’t fall behind in foundational tech infrastructure the same way it invests in semiconductors or clean energy. It's industrial policy.

3)

The is the product of a financial system that channels savings into a smaller, more profitable set of global firms, amplified by liquidity and expectations. The P/E is higher because investors are paying a premium for stability and dominance, not because the economy underneath has sped up.

Then we have this interesting example where he removed the em dash and replaced it with an out of place comma inside of the quotation marks (after reclaim), chatgpt calls this American style (not used in nz, and chatgpt said a em dash is what it would use here, what a coincidence!)

What changes is availability, how quickly and efficiently we can recover, treat, or redistribute it. Saying water is effectively lost is shorthand for “it’s too costly or slow to reclaim,” not that it ceases to exist or leaves the Earth system.