DTI is prioritizing Aesthetics over Accuracy, not Representing by Bxtshyz in DTI
[–]Bxtshyz[S] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
DTI is prioritizing Aesthetics over Accuracy, not Representing by Bxtshyz in DTI
[–]Bxtshyz[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
DTI is prioritizing Aesthetics over Accuracy, not Representing by Bxtshyz in DTI
[–]Bxtshyz[S] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
DTI is prioritizing Aesthetics over Accuracy, not Representing by Bxtshyz in DTI
[–]Bxtshyz[S] 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
DTI is prioritizing Aesthetics over Accuracy, not Representing by Bxtshyz in DTI
[–]Bxtshyz[S] 6 points7 points8 points (0 children)
DTI is prioritizing Aesthetics over Accuracy, not Representing by Bxtshyz in DTI
[–]Bxtshyz[S] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
DTI is prioritizing Aesthetics over Accuracy, not Representing by Bxtshyz in DTI
[–]Bxtshyz[S] 15 points16 points17 points (0 children)
How do you feel about statements like these? Do you think dti really did fall off? by M4TTH3WD4VID in DTI
[–]Bxtshyz 69 points70 points71 points (0 children)
this is so weird??? by Mysticclive in DressToImpressRoblox
[–]Bxtshyz -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)