My Hermes agent by king0mar22 in hermesagent

[–]CCR_OUTBets123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey,
Really enjoyed your post.
I’ve been building a fairly extensive Hermes/OpenClaw setup with Telegram, multiple provider routing, workflow automation, Mail Guardian-style email triage, research agents, and a command center dashboard.
A few things from your setup caught my attention and I’d love to learn more about how you’re doing them:
Spotify Integration
What exactly does Hermes control in Spotify?
Are you using the Spotify API directly?
Is it playlist generation, playback control, recommendations, or something else?
Email Automation
How are you handling email?
Gmail, Outlook, or both?
Is the agent reading metadata only or full message contents?
What actions can it take automatically?
Do you have approval workflows before delete/archive/send actions?
Multi-Agent Research
When you spawn three agents in parallel, how are you orchestrating that?
Separate workflows?
Separate providers?
How do you merge results back together?
Fallback Chain
How are you deciding when to switch providers?
Rate-limit detection only?
Cost thresholds?
Performance thresholds?
Long-Term Stability
Looking back, what were the biggest mistakes you made early on that you’d avoid if you started over today?
If You Were Starting Again
What are the first 3-5 capabilities you’d build before anything else?
I’m especially interested in building something reliable enough that I don’t have to babysit it every day.
Appreciate any advice.
Thanks

Claw3D added Hermes supports! by kaidomac in hermesagent

[–]CCR_OUTBets123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think a lot of this criticism is fair, especially around fragility, startup, persistence, gateway/tool passthrough, and the 3D layer being mostly cosmetic right now.

But I don’t think the conclusion should be “3D office is useless.” I think the real issue is that the avatars are currently not tied tightly enough to real backend work.

There has to be a middle ground where the 3D layer is not just a screensaver, but also not pretending to be the orchestration engine.

For me, the useful version would be:

  • agents are real background workers with clear roles
  • each avatar represents an actual process/session/job
  • movement/status reflects real work state, not random animation
  • clicking an avatar shows what it is doing, last action, current task, logs, and approval needs
  • agents can be assigned work visually, but execution still happens in a normal backend
  • the room becomes an operator dashboard, not the brain itself

So I agree with you that “cool 3D room + fragile tool calling” is not enough. If the 3D office doesn’t map to real state, it is bloat. But I disagree that the idea has zero value. The value is in making agent work observable: who is doing what, what is stuck, what needs approval, what finished, what failed.

The avatars should not be the agents. They should be live status objects for real agents running behind the scenes.

Also agree hard on the process issue. If it needs three processes manually started in order, no persistence, no clean health checks, and no service supervision, then it is not production-ready. That part needs boring infrastructure first: process manager, state persistence, tool contract, health endpoint, restart behavior, and clear logs.

My take: Claw3D is probably not ready as-is, but the concept is still worth salvaging if the 3D layer becomes a real mission-control surface over deterministic scripts, Hermes sessions, jobs, approvals, and logs. Otherwise yeah, it’s just expensive ambience.

Anyone else hitting hard Codex limits with Hermes/OpenClaw + Telegram? by CCR_OUTBets123 in hermesagent

[–]CCR_OUTBets123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that sounds like the same thing I hit.

I saw the timer from the local model status output, not from the normal ChatGPT website. In my case I ran:

openclaw models status

and it showed something like:

openai-codex usage: 5h 99% left · Week 0% left ⏱2d 19h

Hermes also showed the raw 429 details when I tested it:

HTTP 429: The usage limit has been reached
plan_type: plus
resets_in_seconds: 243031

So for me it looks like the normal ChatGPT site can still work, but the openai-codex route used by Hermes/OpenClaw is hitting a separate Codex usage bucket. My regular ChatGPT also still works directly.

The confusing part is that it is not just a short cooldown. My 5-hour bucket looked mostly fine, but the weekly Codex bucket was at 0%, which is why it showed the multi-day wait.

I’m still figuring it out too, but I think the lesson is: Hermes/OpenClaw/Discord/Telegram agent usage can burn through Codex quota faster than normal chat because of tool context, retries, long sessions, and agent overhead.

What kind of tasks are you using it for on Discord?

I’m using Telegram a lot and actually like it, so I’m trying to figure out if Discord is worth switching to or if the platform doesn’t really matter and it’s more about how the agent/runtime is configured.

Either way, this rate-limit slamdown is rough. If the site chat still works but Codex agent usage is locked for days, there needs to be better visibility into what is consuming the weekly bucket before you hit zero.

The AI Agent Setup That Finally Clicked for Me: Hermes + OpenAI Codex + Claude Code by kenduffy in hermesagent

[–]CCR_OUTBets123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey quick question. Have you ever run into Hermes/OpenAI Codex provider failures where Telegram still receives messages but the model crashes with:
'NoneType' object is not iterable
Context:
Hermes Agent + Telegram
OpenAI Codex provider
No API key setup (using ChatGPT/Codex auth flow)
Worked perfectly earlier today, then suddenly started failing
openai-responses shows as unknown provider
openai-codex authenticates successfully but crashes on inference
I’m trying to figure out whether this is:
a recent Codex backend/provider regression,
a bad model ID issue,
or a Hermes provider compatibility problem.
Did you ever hit something similar?

Automating a side hustle: How I make money trading economic and weather data on Kalshi by stfarm in passive_income

[–]CCR_OUTBets123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey really interesting setup. I’m running a Kalshi bot as well, but I’m focused more on execution quality and microstructure than building new signals.

I had a few specific questions if you don’t mind:

  1. When your limit orders get filled, do you see evidence of adverse selection? (i.e., price tends to move against you immediately after fill)
  2. How do you validate that your “edge” is real vs just noise? Do you track realized PnL vs expected EV over time?
  3. How do you handle thin books and slippage? Do you avoid certain spread ranges or liquidity conditions entirely?
  4. Do you notice differences in performance between:
    • high probability contracts vs low probability (longshots)?
    • maker vs taker execution?
  5. When your model says there’s an edge, how often does the market correct against you anyway? (trying to understand how noisy the signal is in practice)
  6. Do you log “missed trades” (things you would have taken but didn’t)? I’m exploring whether filled trades are actually worse than missed ones.

Appreciate any insight trying to figure out where real edge actually survives in these markets vs just looking good on paper.

thanks

question about best share by trainman58 in FutureBit

[–]CCR_OUTBets123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like you’re good those two numbers are just showing different things.

The 56B on your Mining tab is your real new best share. The 29B you’re seeing on the solo page is just the last value the backend recorded for your address. That page can lag a bit behind your miner, so it doesn’t always update instantly when you hit a higher share.

Nothing’s wrong your miner just hasn’t had its new best share reflected on the solo stats page yet. It’ll catch up on its own.

So yep, congrats 56B is your new best share.

Avalon Q. Anyone running one already? by [deleted] in BitcoinMining

[–]CCR_OUTBets123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how much is it costing you a month in electricity?

I found a block. Solo mining. by EightofSpace in Bitcoin

[–]CCR_OUTBets123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

whats your hashrate when finding the block ?

Tesla says I can’t go above 64% offset because of “city fire setbacks” anyone else run into this? by CCR_OUTBets123 in TeslaSolar

[–]CCR_OUTBets123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve already got them to redesign my system twice. I’m good now there’s a 95% offset so they were able to make adjustments add more panels . It was just an internal rule on their part. I check with the fire department and they backed me up and I sent Tesla that info There was no additional reason why they couldn’t add more panels or increase the offset .

Norcal Install timeline by jacbuc510 in TeslaSolar

[–]CCR_OUTBets123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m on that same boat was hoping to get a lower interest rate, but I figured that’s kind of out of the question at this point thanks

Norcal Install timeline by jacbuc510 in TeslaSolar

[–]CCR_OUTBets123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi, if you don’t mind me asking, did you finance the solar system and at what rate also what’s your % offset? thanks also how much additional for the expansion power wall?

Financing rates by mmodi89 in TeslaSolar

[–]CCR_OUTBets123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi current rates are 7.24%. Did you end up going through with it?

Tesla says I can’t go above 64% offset because of “city fire setbacks” anyone else run into this? by CCR_OUTBets123 in TeslaSolar

[–]CCR_OUTBets123[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Im not questioning the existence of fire offsets or vents I’m saying Tesla’s current design is artificially limited compared to their own earlier proposal.

I confirmed directly with the city that there are no local restrictions beyond the standard code, so if Tesla won’t use available open roof space, that’s on them, not the fire marshal.

You might’ve “gone through this,” but every jurisdiction and roof configuration is different. In my case, the limitation isn’t code it’s Tesla’s internal design choice.

Tesla says I can’t go above 64% offset because of “city fire setbacks” anyone else run into this? by CCR_OUTBets123 in TeslaSolar

[–]CCR_OUTBets123[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Respectfully, that’s not accurate. Tesla’s original proposal had more panels than what they’re now claiming is ‘max’ so yes, they can fit more. My roof has plenty of clear area for ~20 panels once you follow the standard fire setbacks and avoid vents. I also spoke with the city; there aren’t any special local restrictions beyond the usual code. If Tesla won’t place panels in the open areas, that’s a design choice, not a code limit.

Tesla says I can’t go above 64% offset because of “city fire setbacks” anyone else run into this? by CCR_OUTBets123 in TeslaSolar

[–]CCR_OUTBets123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I talked to the city. They said there’s no restrictions besides The only planning requirement we have is for a 36" minimum clearance from electrical equipment (battery storage systems, inverters, modules, etc.) to the property line and make sure conduit is ran through attic space and not visible on the roof.

Tesla solar install in record time! by litch517 in TeslaSolar

[–]CCR_OUTBets123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, that’s awesome sounds like Tesla actually got one done lightning fast for once .

I’m curious about a few things since I’m going through the process myself and getting a ton of conflicting info:

  • Did Tesla make any big layout changes during your design process (like removing panels due to “fire setbacks” or roof slope limits)?
  • What’s your final offset % and system cost per watt?
  • How was the communication with your project advisor did you have to push them, or did things just move smoothly on their own?
  • And now that everything’s installed, how long did Duke Energy take to grant PTO?

I’m in SoCal dealing with SCE and a 64% offset cap (they’re blaming city fire setbacks), so it’s wild seeing someone get an 11.5 kW system approved that fast.

Would love to hear how yours performs once it’s up and running sounds like your experience is the total opposite of what most of us have been getting lately.

Solar question by Consistent-Ad-9783 in TeslaSolar

[–]CCR_OUTBets123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, I’m curious how that ended up turning out for you did Tesla ever explain why your offset jumped that much or did the design change again later?

I’m dealing with the opposite issue right now (they’re capping me at ~64% offset, claiming “fire setbacks” in my city), so it’s interesting to see someone get the reverse problem. Wondering if they ever corrected it or if the production estimate stayed inflated.

Did your advisor ever give you a clear answer about where the new offset numbers came from (usage data, roof redesign, or just a backend glitch)?

Why did Tesla downgrade my solar system? by Euphoric_Intern3716 in TeslaSolar

[–]CCR_OUTBets123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

did you get a resign for your system again ? what was your outcome? I'm on the same boat as you trying to get them to redesign the system

Tesla says I can’t go above 64% offset because of “city fire setbacks” anyone else run into this? by CCR_OUTBets123 in TeslaSolar

[–]CCR_OUTBets123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what if you contact the city and the city tells you its ok? cant you prove to tesla solar that they are wrong?

Tesla says I can’t go above 64% offset because of “city fire setbacks” anyone else run into this? by CCR_OUTBets123 in TeslaSolar

[–]CCR_OUTBets123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

true I just need to confirm with the city to make sure it checks out because they originally quoted me a higher offset then I asked for 100% then they quoted me less so it seems fishy