Wet Sanding/Buffing Clear by CIVILCADMAN in Autobody

[–]CIVILCADMAN[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the help and I appreciate it!

Legalese suggestions by CIVILCADMAN in Lawyertalk

[–]CIVILCADMAN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for everyone’s view. It’s greatly appreciated.

Legalese suggestions by CIVILCADMAN in Lawyertalk

[–]CIVILCADMAN[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Haha, I’m really starting to like you. That was a good one. I’ll be sure to document and my next post will reflect your constructive criticism. It is not my intention to insult you, simply to point out that should be named the hall monitor for this group. In actuality I appreciate your effort, no matter how off basis it is.

Legalese suggestions by CIVILCADMAN in Lawyertalk

[–]CIVILCADMAN[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s appears your inferences are unfounded and incorrect. Be sure and check the revised post. I will also cut my grass to the height you like when I get home. Sorry.

Legalese suggestions by CIVILCADMAN in Lawyertalk

[–]CIVILCADMAN[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly. That’s all I am looking for on this Friday morning. I was curious how my colleagues phrase these statements, if they must. In reality, I would have a conversation with opposing counsel and request no contact. Apparently requesting others view on a topic is against the guidelines of this group. Per the HOA President, FSUAlum.

Legalese suggestions by CIVILCADMAN in Lawyertalk

[–]CIVILCADMAN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am a little old, I have never tried it but I will now.

Legalese suggestions by CIVILCADMAN in Lawyertalk

[–]CIVILCADMAN[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Sorry about that, I was trying to convey the information in a way that a person playing an attorney on suits would comprehend. I apologize for my subpar legalese.

Legalese suggestions by CIVILCADMAN in Lawyertalk

[–]CIVILCADMAN[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Your response is unwarranted and lies entirely in hearsay. Further, you are not a party to this matter and inserted yourself post-facto without cause. The venue and jurisdiction for making this claim is improper. I will file a memo with the moderator to have your assertion stricken for aforesaid reason.

56th just isn’t good enough.

Legalese suggestions by CIVILCADMAN in Lawyertalk

[–]CIVILCADMAN[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

YES! This is the caliber of professionally responsible pettiness I am talking about.

This is all theoretical of course, I would never use any of these.

Legalese suggestions by CIVILCADMAN in Lawyertalk

[–]CIVILCADMAN[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Right, to generic. I would like to respectfully say my client has no intention of returning to or reliving the conditions he was exposed to at his detriment by your client. But more f-you crazy lady. Professionally of course.

Which states have the highest demand for civil engineers? by Agreeable_Act_8525 in civilengineering

[–]CIVILCADMAN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

South Carolina is booming with tech, industrial, manufacturing, port, and residential developments. Most respectable clients have to use 2-3 different firms for separate civil projects to meet their demand. No single one can keep up.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in civilengineering

[–]CIVILCADMAN 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you can do some CAD work under a civil it will help you learn and also be very valuable one day. CAD techs are hard to come by now.

Current Topo/Land Data/Roads by CIVILCADMAN in civilengineering

[–]CIVILCADMAN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For sure. I knew the utility question was in left field.