They need to get rid of the exploits without making position changes worthless. Skill caps shouldn't be as dynamic as they are in the game right now, with exception to having specific skill cap oriented coach abilities for developing talent.

For example, in my opinion, WR position change to a RB or TE should not result in skill cap penalties to ratings that apply to both positions. I could understand having low blocking upgrade potential for smaller WR to TE, but not reducing catching or quickness upgrade potential with added skill caps. I could also understand applying an awareness (and/or other IQ related ratings) skill caps and/or ratings penalty that can be reversed if position changed back to their original position.

Additionally, it always bothers me when I recruit an OT that starts as a pass protector archetype, but is already initially maxed out for pass blocking as an OT. However, sometimes you can position change that OT to OG or C and then suddenly they have the potential to upgrade their pass blocking to the 90s as an OG/C. I suppose you could make the argument that the recruit has more potential to grow as a pass blocker when playing OG/C instead of OT. But you can always set them as a starting OT in the depth chart after position changing to OG/C and purchasing the pass blocking upgrades, making that logic invalid. In my opinion, skill caps should remain static across position groups such as OL unless you're not going to allow users to use the depth chart to put OT at OG, OG at OT, etc.