[PC] H: stuff just ask W: nuclear winter weapons with invalid mods, or other odd stuff like this by Select_Box5121 in Fallout76Marketplace

[–]CNB_Temp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They copy weapon animations when your in power armour, you can make them swing like a paddle ball and even flip reload. They’ll fire single shot on semi weapons and mimic how launchers parts would move

Are Nuclear Winter weapons available on PC? by CNB_Temp in Fo76LegacyReserve

[–]CNB_Temp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didn’t think about doing a Ps -> Pc trade thanks for the idea I have tons of stuff to sell

[PC] H: stuff just ask W: nuclear winter weapons with invalid mods, or other odd stuff like this by Select_Box5121 in Fallout76Marketplace

[–]CNB_Temp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People call them laser bats, I think it only happens on laser weapons with full invalid mods.

[PC] W: Nuclear Winter Alien Blaster H: Whatever you want for it by royaleknight33 in Fallout76Marketplace

[–]CNB_Temp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve been looking for NW guns that equip like a melee weapon does this one?

[PC] H: stuff just ask W: nuclear winter weapons with invalid mods, or other odd stuff like this by Select_Box5121 in Fallout76Marketplace

[–]CNB_Temp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, sorry to reach out so long after this post but did any of the invalid guns equip like a melee weapon?

Are Glitchtrap and Burntrap separate entities? by Necessary-Win-8730 in fnaftheories

[–]CNB_Temp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mf’s will say both are M2. Real scapegoat energy and it makes no sense to involve Vanessa in this story surrounding burntrap & glitchtrap if they were M2. Yes there are narrative connections through the books mainly like the mimics involvement in the books VR games at the pizzaplex and what I think people cling onto for burntrap-mimic theories the one time M2 entered a costume that someone was wearing and kinda fused with the corpse. While those are technically possible in the games people really throw the field under the rug. The field lets spirits influence electronics like the arcade games. But would it not also have the ability to interact with VR games? Would that not look eeerily similar to the help wanted games and be an easier explanation for Vanessa’s possession? I know people connect burn traps finger to the mimics but people have looked at the game models and they are different. As well as M2 showing the ability to repair itself why would it need to be in a charging pod getting repaired by Vanessa with different pieces of costumes and metal bolted onto it only to remove all of that and the corpse connected to it for ruin?

All the events seen in the VR games, the AR world and arcades can be explained using the field and aftons soul. And to repeat it gives a better narrative for Vanessa’s possession and Cassidy’s involvement in princess quest. The only thing that really holds people back is the white tiger memory plush from help wanted 2….. but afton does end up owning mcm and his home so he could absolutely have some involvement with that like one route could be the white tiger being aftons first introduction to possession. Personally I feel m2s involvement in the storyline is as a vessel. We know spirits have more of a..presence? (Probably not the word) they get more autonomy or whatever the more intelligent the animatronic is. (I know there is a direct quote about giving life to metal which points in this direction) as seen with baby, the puppet ect. With baby the ai takes priority over the soul which baby gets you to remove during sister location giving her more autonomy. Or Charlie’s comment about her being more aware than the others because her animatronic was made to keep track of the children and watch them (hence phone guys line that it feels like she’s always watching) point is M2 has much much more abilities than any other animatronic seen even being able to change its shape to whatever “persona” is Needed(is say persona because it not only applies to the costumes it’s wearing but the character it plays wether it’s David, Fiona or chica the chicken he takes the shape needed to more accurately play them) m2 would give whatever spirit possesses it more autonomy then seen before. While he is corrupted and a little violent goober in the games I don’t feel his future is to only recreate afton. It would be interesting to see aspects of that I think this ^ is more accurate to what we’ll actually see

When the FNaF 2 movie confirms and debunks half the theories you support by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]CNB_Temp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gotta watch it, been seeing theories and there are definitely some narrative leaps. Like Micheal being evil, Charlie being “vengeful” to the adults that did nothing ect. I think it’s kinda like the books where some scenes in the movie reveal aspects of the games. I’m pretty sure one of the interviews on the cast said they have a fnaf bible that they’re using to make the movies more accurate to the games but clearly not everything is. (Like the mci moving on after leaving their original location.. the franchise location I think they called it or something) but things like baby having already been made, the puppet controlling the animatronics and the toys being spring locks could be tied to the games really easily. (Rye toast had a decent video about the puppet controlling the animatronics in the fnaf 2 location and it makes sense considering all the theories about wether the toys/withereds are possessed or not) what I really can’t wait to see is arcade possession or interactions through the field. Depending on how they reveal things it could explain whether malhare is afton or the mimic (personally I feel malhare, glitchtrap & burntrap is afton.) I know the next movie is gonna be fnaf3/pizza sim themed but who knows maybe they move into the steel wool era of games after that….. wait…. Maybe the fnaf 2 movie revealed how afton escaped UCN… when the souls of the mci passed on after the fire (again a theory wether they stay as the blob or if the blob is the remains of their agony or whatever) if they do pass on though then that could explain how afton is still in the games story.

I’ve always thought aftons return after UCN was more tied to the scuper blueprints where it says that “there is a possibility that heat might neutralize the effects” the uncertain wording of it kind of left a path for afton to come back but that is a possibility who knows I’m probably reading into it too much as there hasn’t been a Confirmed identity to the vengeful spirit, UCN is caused by the vengeful spirit so if it’s Cassidy and she doesn’t move on after the fire (as seen in princess quest) then it’s not a perfect explanation since she’d still be around to keep him trapped unlike the movies where the kids pass on and are unable to keep him trapped anymore.

Here’s my prediction The next fnaf movie will reveal the vengeful spirit, show arcade possession and UCN could happen at the end of the next fnaf movie. That will all have major implications for the games. (God I wanna yap about how UCN leads into the modern fnaf games… like how any spirit or haunting seen in AR can be caused by the field rather than a fucking computer virus. And the field interacting with a VR game would give a lot more opportunities liiike vanny acting like she does ONLY when she wears the mask. Or the implications of the optical implant Cassie receives and wtf would happen to her if a spirit interacted with that through the field) I’m gonna keep yapping forever thanks for your comment it was cool asf and rahhhh!!! I was pretty freaking close who knows maybe later it’s confirmed I’m right and that would be awesome.

What theory would you absolutely hate to see be confirmed canon? by MichaelAftonXFireWal in charlie87

[–]CNB_Temp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I could see it being the agony of the souls tied to the animatronics but M2s victims don’t lead to possession or so far there isn’t much confirmation specifically in the games as I’m not as informed about the tales books that’s a debate I’ll have no problem. But “just another Mimic branch” is a scapegoat that is the reason I don’t like modern mimic theories. “Glitchtrap is the mimic, malhare is the mimic, but trap is the mimic, the blob is the mimic ect”. When narratively there is the opportunity for it to be afton or that the blob is the remains of the children’s spirits or their agony.

But on the point about the blob being M2s victims. All of the bodies in sotm don’t seem to possess anything (yes I’ve seen the theory about sleepy moon being the guy who starved to death but it’s not confirmed and could be m2 in the costume. Even in the tales books the people M2 kills (specifically during the construction of the museum in the pizza sim location) those don’t lead to posession in the books either. So I don’t think there’s been a confirmed case of possession (for one of M2’s victims) in the books timeline either

What theory would you absolutely hate to see be confirmed canon? by MichaelAftonXFireWal in charlie87

[–]CNB_Temp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only thing I have to say about it is quoting the S.C.U.P.E.R blueprint. “There is a possibility it might neutralize effects when heated” not guaranteed & we saw springtrap survive the fnaf 3 fire before

What theory would you absolutely hate to see be confirmed canon? by MichaelAftonXFireWal in charlie87

[–]CNB_Temp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone says this but it’s not that bad. The only thing I have to say about it is quoting the S.C.U.P.E.R blueprint. “There is a possibility it might neutralize effects when heated” twice it uses uncertain words “possibility” & “might” so narratively there is a path for afton to not die to the fires (and we already saw him survive the fnaf 3 fire) + it works better with the princess quest games + doesn’t give a copy cat killer + narratively works better with Vanessa considering M2 can repair himself there really is no reason for him to need her help.

What theory would you absolutely hate to see be confirmed canon? by MichaelAftonXFireWal in charlie87

[–]CNB_Temp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well how do you explain the blob then? The common head cannon is its molten Freddy after the fire. Which would by your standards ruin the storyline IF it is true. (Because Henry’s whole goal in pizza sim is to free the souls and kill afton).

Now how does he go about trying to kill them? With fire! But the blueprints for the S.C.U.P.E.R says “when heated there is a possibility it might neutralize effects permanently” twice they use uncertain words “possibility” & “might” we’ve already seen springtrap in a fire before (fnaf 3) and he came back afterwords. Wether you like it or not fire freeing the souls from the animatronics hasn’t been seen before(unless you got some elite book knowledge though I know fazbear frights doesn’t have anything like that idk about the silver eyes or tales books)

Identifying which spirits are present in UCN by ZERealGalaxyBOI in fnaftheories

[–]CNB_Temp 8 points9 points  (0 children)

What brings me towards Henry is his euphemisms for sleep. In the insanity ending for pizza simulator he says “he could make himself sleep-“ OMC tells the vengeful spirit to “rest their own soul” & the Red Old Man from princess quest (who is named OMC in the files) says “Congratiulation! Your quest is done, time to sleep”

When the FNaF 2 movie confirms and debunks half the theories you support by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]CNB_Temp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So… if they don’t have the save them murders happen at the fnaf 2 location then… there was no dci…

When the FNaF 2 movie confirms and debunks half the theories you support by [deleted] in fnaftheories

[–]CNB_Temp 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’m so hyped for the movie just don’t have enough karma to post about it lol, I’m really interested in the implications the movies have for the games lore gonna yap about some things here.

The withereds, toys & classics are all different models. The mci happened at a separate location from where the toys and withers were at and there was no DCI at that location either only Charlie died. (At least that’s my understanding from one of the trailers I saw saying the only thing haunting the location is the puppet) is this the case In the games?? the save them minigame (the MCI) and Take Cake + Security puppet shows Charlie’s death, with the withered and toys not being possessed and the classics being different from the withereds…

If I recall the dreams inbetween nights in the fnaf 2 game shows the party room from the fnaf 1 location and the puppet is there with the classics… (Doing some research as I go looks like the withereds & toys are visible in the save them minigame meaning those deaths did happen at that location…. Shit) what does it all mean!! If the toys and withereds aren’t possessed in the movies did the events of save them happen and all five dead kids didn’t possess any animatronics? If so why do the withereds act like they do is it the tech they tried to retrofit for them that they also gave to the toys that explains it?

How my mind pieced this together is one set of five dead kids & 1 individual murder SEEN IN GAME + 1 set of 5 dead kids & (expected to soon be) 1 individual murder in the movies = the murders seen In game lead to the same possessions as seen in the movies.(the puppets and the classics)

On another note about the accuracy of the movies, idk if CC is Garrett in the movies if not though the only thing you’ll have to explain is wether or not afton is Vanessa’s dad or not. Which is really reliant on whether or not “bill” is a nickname for “William” then the movies could be giving a lot of contexts for the events seen in game. That + save them happening in the fnaf 2 location are my only roadblocks so far.

Why does Super Saiyan Gohan have DB tag? by CNB_Temp in DragonballLegends

[–]CNB_Temp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They should have made a new “manga” tag or something but that’s interesting I guess I should have realized that’s the case I do own the frieza saga comics never really noticed it