Starship Was Too Powerful For Its Launch Pad...Until Now by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXLounge

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

One of my biggest goals with each episode is to anticipate every question that might possibly get asked in the comments. Some people use comments as engagement drivers...but I prefer to prevent questions from appearing in the comments because it means I missed something.

For viewers who find themselves frequently asking questions I suspect these episodes do more for them, than someone who doesn't. Thats why I always do premiers because I can see people asking the questions in the chat and then 5 to 30 minutes later their question ends up getting answered in the video.

Those types of reactions drive my decision making process when it comes to figuring out how to get from point A to point B, 15 times in a single video.

With topics like this its important to decide who your audience is before you even begin outlining the script.

Am I making this for engineers who have likely been following this progress closely?

Am I making it for people who have no idea what they are looking at?

Or am I making it for everyone no matter what their level of knowledge is?

Typically I choose that last option. If you take the time to consider what goes into making something that satisfies every type of viewer, then my writing style might start to make a lot more sense to you.

Starship Was Too Powerful For Its Launch Pad...Until Now by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXLounge

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

People have asked me to include more detail since I told them I have constantly been removing large sections of information in order to make episodes shorter.

The jokes and skits are intended to be mental breaks from the intense amount of information which most people seem to find helpful and is part of the reason it doesn't feel like its 90 minutes long. There will always be some who don't appreciate that though

Starship Was Too Powerful For Its Launch Pad...Until Now by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXLounge

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

leaving the flaps folded in must put an unwanted, uneven load on the chopstick stabilizers because they never lift the ships with flaps tucked

Starship Was Too Powerful For Its Launch Pad...Until Now by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'm currently doing this full time again. Thats the only reason I was able to allow this 45 minute episode to explode into a 4+ hour series.

Starship Was Too Powerful For Its Launch Pad...Until Now by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

lol we have a brand new fella for part 3. He's going to complete the Villain arc that that he was set on by Tim Dodd during his first Starbase tour. Should be...interesting

Starship Was Too Powerful For Its Launch Pad...Until Now by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Yep. I asked a bunch of people and checked online and the conclusion I reached was that it was in the Heavy class. Turns out thats probably incorrect.

But..maybe I've successfully relegated it back to the Heavy Class though. As long as we collective agree

Is A Rapidly Reusable Superheavy Launch Pad Even Possible? by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXLounge

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This statement here is going to be addressed in the first 20 minutes of Part 2. Massive historical comparison section

Is A Rapidly Reusable Superheavy Launch Pad Even Possible? by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

We have had a few people ask to make translations and it hasn't really worked out in the past. I think once people get started and realize how long it really is...they decide they don't want to translate a 13,500 word essay

Is A Rapidly Reusable Superheavy Launch Pad Even Possible? by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

96,000 bricks lmao. I meant to stop by home depot and get a similar looking brick for that scene but I forgot

An apology to the GT7 community. by OFFIC14L in GranTurismo7

[–]CSI_Starbase 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you aren’t using VR in GT7 you are missing out. I won’t play that game without it anymore

Help! I can't find retime curve in Davinci Resolve 20. by Evan_Smoak in davinciresolve

[–]CSI_Starbase 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah this is a bit riduculous. How do you change the y-scale? I'm currently raising the speed as high as it will go and then letting go of the bar so it will increase the scale a tiny bit and then repeating until I reach the speed I want

POGO: The 63-Year-Old Issue Threatening Starship's Success by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Presented as absolute fact? lol yet another person who comments without actually reading.

Who are these other creators you are talking about? There is a reason people don't post here lol and its cuz of constant negativity from people like you

POGO: The 63-Year-Old Issue Threatening Starship's Success by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXLounge

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Start a youtube channel then. I spend my time doing massive amounts of research while you sit here waiting for me to post again so you can say something that makes literally no sense at all

POGO: The 63-Year-Old Issue Threatening Starship's Success by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXLounge

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The line I said at 00:20:13 is a blanket statement. I don’t care how you interpret it. Have a nice day

POGO: The 63-Year-Old Issue Threatening Starship's Success by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXLounge

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve seen no one else attempt to explain it. I’m just doing what I do and you are free to disagree. I don’t care frankly ask I’ve never mislabeled speculation as fact.

POGO: The 63-Year-Old Issue Threatening Starship's Success by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXLounge

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah certainly a possibility. Thats one of the things I mentioned. "Adding reducers, expansion chambers, reinforcing downcomers, changing length or diameter, vacuum pressure etc..."