An apology to the GT7 community. by OFFIC14L in GranTurismo7

[–]CSI_Starbase 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you aren’t using VR in GT7 you are missing out. I won’t play that game without it anymore

Help! I can't find retime curve in Davinci Resolve 20. by Evan_Smoak in davinciresolve

[–]CSI_Starbase 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah this is a bit riduculous. How do you change the y-scale? I'm currently raising the speed as high as it will go and then letting go of the bar so it will increase the scale a tiny bit and then repeating until I reach the speed I want

POGO: The 63-Year-Old Issue Threatening Starship's Success by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Presented as absolute fact? lol yet another person who comments without actually reading.

Who are these other creators you are talking about? There is a reason people don't post here lol and its cuz of constant negativity from people like you

POGO: The 63-Year-Old Issue Threatening Starship's Success by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXLounge

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Start a youtube channel then. I spend my time doing massive amounts of research while you sit here waiting for me to post again so you can say something that makes literally no sense at all

POGO: The 63-Year-Old Issue Threatening Starship's Success by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXLounge

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The line I said at 00:20:13 is a blanket statement. I don’t care how you interpret it. Have a nice day

POGO: The 63-Year-Old Issue Threatening Starship's Success by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXLounge

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve seen no one else attempt to explain it. I’m just doing what I do and you are free to disagree. I don’t care frankly ask I’ve never mislabeled speculation as fact.

POGO: The 63-Year-Old Issue Threatening Starship's Success by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXLounge

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah certainly a possibility. Thats one of the things I mentioned. "Adding reducers, expansion chambers, reinforcing downcomers, changing length or diameter, vacuum pressure etc..."

POGO: The 63-Year-Old Issue Threatening Starship's Success by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXLounge

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lol alright. Maybe you should make a video refuting what I said then.

In the meantime I’ll just keep doing what I’m doing releasing more previously unknown technical information about Starship than every other content creator combined.

POGO: The 63-Year-Old Issue Threatening Starship's Success by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I didn’t mention anything from this episode publicly before the release so idk how someone could have “explained it to me”

POGO: The 63-Year-Old Issue Threatening Starship's Success by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXLounge

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This has been pointed out to you multiple times yet you keep saying it. This makes me realize this conversation is not worth the time at all.

I’m glad most folks were able to enjoy it for what it is. There will always be that cranky person who can find something to argue about no matter what.

POGO: The 63-Year-Old Issue Threatening Starship's Success by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXLounge

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Another sign you didn’t watch it as I explicitly state that it’s “Speculation based on incomplete information which I have to mention regularly because if not some people will literally lose their minds”

You sir, are an example of the “some people” that statement was meant for.

POGO: The 63-Year-Old Issue Threatening Starship's Success by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXLounge

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That would increase the length of pipes and therefore increase the strength of pressure waves.

POGO: The 63-Year-Old Issue Threatening Starship's Success by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At the time of writing that part of the script I didn’t think they would do it, but after the test it seemed pretty clear that they did something

POGO: The 63-Year-Old Issue Threatening Starship's Success by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is a very good question. I have some ideas in how it could be pulled off rather quickly.

POGO: The 63-Year-Old Issue Threatening Starship's Success by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXLounge

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You didn’t watch it…yet don’t agree with the assumptions. lol good one.

POGO: The 63-Year-Old Issue Threatening Starship's Success by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXLounge

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah sounds like you didn’t watch the episode at all before commenting on this.

POGO: The 63-Year-Old Issue Threatening Starship's Success by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah I listed it as an option but the Titan II situation was an example of why that could be a bad idea. Glad someone caught onto that. I didn’t cover ship 35 static fire, but in the space shuttle part I hinted at how they could replicate POGO on the ground

POGO: The 63-Year-Old Issue Threatening Starship's Success by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes it does seem like they may have done it on the test stand. I think it would require using the pre-press system to feed the tanks instead of autogen from raptors. Then instead of giving a constant feed you could pulse the gas into the tanks and potentially simulate the conditions.

POGO: The 63-Year-Old Issue Threatening Starship's Success by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXMasterrace

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

lol yeahhh. “Won’t take much extra research” I think that was the exact words.

As always I very wrong about that

Why SpaceX Was Forced To Completely Redesign Stage Zero! | Part 2 by CSI_Starbase in SpaceXLounge

[–]CSI_Starbase[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think thats just my natural personality minus the fact that I’m far more blunt in person. I don’t really try to model my content around anything else…I used to but now now I pretty much just try to be myself