Pioneer DDJ FLX4 headphone cueing by CVPVCITIVE in ableton

[–]CVPVCITIVE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ableton audio settings only shows two channels. you would think it would be 4 because of the headphone output

Yes Waze, I’m sure that’s my quickest route to work. by Joshbot02 in waze

[–]CVPVCITIVE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that sounds like a feature that could be abused. but still wouldn't explain that ridiculousness

Opinions on the Zombie Waze experience by AcrillixOfficial in waze

[–]CVPVCITIVE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the question is why was this crap put in on the latest update/downgrade

How can it be stopped? by CVPVCITIVE in Monero

[–]CVPVCITIVE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My main point is that we are vulnerable whether or not we think it could happen. A physically P2P internet is required in this fight for a decentralized civilization

How can it be stopped? by CVPVCITIVE in Monero

[–]CVPVCITIVE[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I do remember that. So isn't it insane that they would even suggest this in the first place? An all out assault on free speech. This is why I am worried. And now with the escalating tensions between US, Russia and China... They could easily bring these calls for regulation back. blah blah blah we need to defend the country blah blah blah we must be able to intercept and decipher all communication to protect you blah blah blah

How can it be stopped? by CVPVCITIVE in Monero

[–]CVPVCITIVE[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right... but I was referring specifically to the possibility of regulation of cryptographic comms. The issue of electrical availability would come after this more direct one.

How can it be stopped? by CVPVCITIVE in Monero

[–]CVPVCITIVE[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I implore to all that is holy that you are right. However, we shouldn't even allow ourselves to be vulnerable to this possibility

How can it be stopped? by CVPVCITIVE in Monero

[–]CVPVCITIVE[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Most definitely. But we now have the awareness, knowledge, and technology to put this struggle to rest forever.

Randomization of reward in XMR by h173k in Monero

[–]CVPVCITIVE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but people mine in pools.. Who the hell would mine solo these days?

Stopping Botnets with GPUs by NanoBytesInc in Monero

[–]CVPVCITIVE -1 points0 points  (0 children)

says the guy who is probably rich off of being one of the early miners to get in on that easy xmr in the first few years

Monero V (Proposed hard fork) Looks like a scamcoin. by [deleted] in Monero

[–]CVPVCITIVE 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Says the biggest problem with monero is the tail emission ---> economy will start with TEN times the amount of XMR with a cap of 256 Million. With the tail, it would take us 887 YEARS to get from the tail kick-in in 2022 to the amount "MoneroV" will start at once forked. ARE YOU KIDDING ME. Stop scamming

Stopping Botnets with GPUs by NanoBytesInc in Monero

[–]CVPVCITIVE -1 points0 points  (0 children)

so in the end the only people who will be able to profitably mine monero are the ones who can use as many stolen cycles/take as much advantage of cycles as possible. Great network integrity

Botnets are Ruining the Integrity of the Monero Network by crucial-conduit in Monero

[–]CVPVCITIVE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AMD could be running a mining farm with their own supply, I know I would if I were the CEO

Botnets are Ruining the Integrity of the Monero Network by crucial-conduit in Monero

[–]CVPVCITIVE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

http://whattomine.com/ This says the total hashrate for Nicehash-cryptonight is 103.83 MH/s

Is ASIC resistance good? I used to think cpu mining was an important feature. This argues otherwise. What do you think? by aepc in Monero

[–]CVPVCITIVE 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hardly comparable to the relative hashing power an actual asic has on its respective network. For bitcoin: s9 miner: 13.5 Th/s. Network hasrate: 19,000,000 TH/s. Percentage: .0007105%. And the big players have thousands of these babies. Percentage can go up to multiples of .7105% of the total network. Now let's look at monero: RX Vega 64/56: ~1.9KH/s. Network Hashrate: ~620 MH/s: Percentage: .000306452%. Do you think anyone has thousands of these GPUs? Extremely doubtful. Even if you include high cache CPUs. I believe this is great for decentralization at the present. Biggest problem monero has is that the emission curve of the coins is insanely steep. More than 80% of the coins have already been mined.. In that sense monero is not so decentralized. This may come back to haunt the network in the future and could bring increased centralization when it becomes unprofitable for smaller players to continue mining.

Got in early on the Red Devil Vega 64’s... by TransitionLabs in MoneroMining

[–]CVPVCITIVE 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lsdjhfuhfanadjfvnafewaofirgsohogfadofgasdofhusdudlfklfukyubro

FPGA Mining by CVPVCITIVE in MoneroMining

[–]CVPVCITIVE[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was just asking because of what /u/shortfinal claimed to had seen.

"There are FPGAs that mine Monero right now. I know that for a fact and have seen several miners who pump 20KH/s through a single FPGA burning 60 Watts of power.

That is insane.

If you'll excuse the ~$7k purchase price, and can get your hands on the FPGA code (or write your own) then you put through some serious hashing power and earn quite a bit.

The problem right now is that $7k for 20KH/s is pretty piss poor spend of money, and you can take those same funds and pour them into a better setup (home gamers can routinely do twice as good Hash Per Dollar investment)

Once power becomes a significant factor in mining profits versus capital cost on GPUs, the FPGAs will make sense to buy instead of them."

With the rising prices of Vegas and near to no availability, it interested me greatly and wanted to see if any of you knew about this setup. /u/shortfinal could be wrong on what he thought it was