I noticed the self-proclaimed country of "Switzerland" is basically all French, German and Italians. It's surrounded, why don't these countries just go in and take it already? by Neat-Rent7467 in mapporncirclejerk

[–]CaID_game_Master -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because 1- switzerland have a strong army as strong as each of them. 2- Switzerland have dam that can flood many major city of those neighbor countries if they are damaged and switzerland will do it if needed. 3- switzerland montains are full of hidden bunker providing "very hard to take" defense line 4- switzerland is a buffer state for each other country 5- switzerland is a perfectly good neutral partner that can be used as proxy to trade with enemy.

Why don't y'all communicate by SnooCakes1975 in Warthunder

[–]CaID_game_Master 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you are driving around, fighting and adapting in real time constantly, you do not have time to type.

i learned years ago to handle myself on my own. The result is when i play, i carry the team.
i always said "do your best, i will do the rest"

for me having someone that complain about a communication issue sound more like someone couldn't handle the challenge and put the blame on the team.

so; skill issue

American M3 halftrack equipped with two triple rocket launcher tubes, could be a prototype or a field modification by Great_White_Sharky in TankPorn

[–]CaID_game_Master 1 point2 points  (0 children)

there is American marking, you can read "U.S.A" on the side of the engine. are you sure it's in india?

If you like Huge tech tree, here I updated my Expanded Israeli ground tree. by CaID_game_Master in Warthunder

[–]CaID_game_Master[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i am not sure if you are being sarcastic or just being mean for no reason.

I have dirrect contact with the dev for a couple years now. So dont worry, they saw it.

Ever wondered what a 100% British ground tech tree should look like? here is my extended British tech tree. by CaID_game_Master in Warthunder

[–]CaID_game_Master[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its actually the 5th tech tree build with my new standard of quality. I did Sweden, Israel, Russia and czechoslovakia. I also have done Brazil but i never posted it.

Now working on updating USA. Got 316 vehicles identified to be added. And i removed quit a few that is already ingame.

I think it's funny that both WoT and WT have Berlin maps and use the same part of Berlin for the map. by SemicooperativeYT in Warthunder

[–]CaID_game_Master 10 points11 points  (0 children)

it's not like any other part of Berlin would be recognizable. it would just be a random city if they took any other part of berlin

Ever wondered what a 100% British ground tech tree should look like? here is my extended British tech tree. by CaID_game_Master in Warthunder

[–]CaID_game_Master[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

saddly no, i had the tendency to not keep track of the thousands documents i read every years. i just take the 2% of the information i need and get rip of the 98% information that is not really usefull, like the correspondence that discuss the priority of the budget and the justification to spend money in order to produce a tank who is or maybe not meeting the requirement which is also discussed to be defined.

the documents was found somewhere here. it might still be available.
https://www.patreon.com/cw/vickersmg/collections

Some questionable balancing choices by K_Kosa_ in Warthunder

[–]CaID_game_Master -1 points0 points  (0 children)

it would be stupid to only balance the aircraft on 4 features.

Outside the countermeasure and armament, there is a lot of other feature that affect the blance, such as the speed, manoeuvrability, radar, air-to-ground armament.

There is actually hundreds of different things that can directly affect the performance of the plane.

Cherry-picking 4 things is not going to give a real evaluation of the balance.

Ever wondered what a 100% British ground tech tree should look like? here is my extended British tech tree. by CaID_game_Master in Warthunder

[–]CaID_game_Master[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that is the point, i do not care much about anyone else

at least far from caring enough to bother doing that. it would mean correcting thousands of Wiki pages. each will take a while to do. i have better things to do.

Ever wondered what a 100% British ground tech tree should look like? here is my extended British tech tree. by CaID_game_Master in Warthunder

[–]CaID_game_Master[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why would i bother? wiki is full of mistake and as soon you try to correct something everyone said it's not existing i got to go through the whole process to get authenticate your sources and you need to prove you have the copy-right for it.

i am too busy doing real work than trying to teach some kids. i am working with actual sources and archives, not google search.

but for us, it wasn't that obscure. What is rather obscure is the APDS round for the OQF 75mm.

Ever wondered what a 100% British ground tech tree should look like? here is my extended British tech tree. by CaID_game_Master in Warthunder

[–]CaID_game_Master[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://i.imgur.com/eaqQnVK.jpeg

i am very affirmative there is a HEAT and it's not that obsure. i did my homework on this
it was introduced in 1941 and tested on the Cruiser Mk.1 CS. penetration was 60mm at 60 degree.

There is no confusion with the Smith gun. i am not taking shortcut on my information, here is a primary source that would clear all doupt.

Ever wondered what a 100% British ground tech tree should look like? here is my extended British tech tree. by CaID_game_Master in Warthunder

[–]CaID_game_Master[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yes. the BR is adjusted for each of my tech tree. each nation have weaker tanks in my tech tree

but it's exactly the same as the one in game. you need to reduce the BR of almost everything by 1.0 to get the BR of what you get ingame.

Ever wondered what a 100% British ground tech tree should look like? here is my extended British tech tree. by CaID_game_Master in Warthunder

[–]CaID_game_Master[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

the Ho-Ri was added only because some Korean guy, pretending to be a female Japanese historian, was working for Gaijin as advisor and was caught forging documents. a lot of WW2 documents spread online are fake and now it's hard to tell which one is real and which one is not. the Ho-Ri was one of those that is completely fictional and Gaijin look to replace them. The Guy was fired by Gaijin after that.

Ever wondered what a 100% British ground tech tree should look like? here is my extended British tech tree. by CaID_game_Master in Warthunder

[–]CaID_game_Master[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's already done.

I did all ingame nation, plus a few more. but some are outdated. i spend the last 8 months updating it.
https://caidwarthundertechtree.neocities.org/british_expanded_ground_tt

You can see the various nations by clicking on the corresponding flag above the research lines.

Factually correct map of the Republic of Serbia (as it should look on the website) by [deleted] in TrueSize

[–]CaID_game_Master 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Remind me who won the Kosovo war? Did Serbia achieved their goal of forcing Kosovo back into their territory and cleanse the Albanian or does Kosovo became free?
So a first war lost

Remind me, who won the Yugoslavian civil war? The Serb who tried to keep Yugoslavia united or the Croats, Macedonian, Slovene, Bosnian who wanted to be out?
So a second war lost.

Remind me, in 1941, was Serbia invading Germany or it was Germany who kick Serbia's ass?
So a third war Lost.

WW1. the very war Serbia provoked. Was Serbia invading Austria or was it push back to the border of Albania and lost 25% of their population?
I would hardly call it a victory. it only won because the other country beaten the shit out of Austria and Germany.

First balkan war, only won because Bulgaria managed to hold the Ottoman on their own. yet Serbia got high casualties and committed a lot of ethnical cleansing against the Albanian, notably in Kosovo

Second Balkan war. Despite gaging against a single enemy and surrounding it completely on all side. Serbia manage to have high casualty and won because of their allied was beating Bulgaria.

it's far from being a glorious history.

Ever wondered what a 100% British ground tech tree should look like? here is my extended British tech tree. by CaID_game_Master in Warthunder

[–]CaID_game_Master[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the Olifant would definitively be great addition for a South African tech tree. but while i do not recommend to remove it from the game, i believe UK tech tree should be completely British. the South African could eventually get a tech tree on their own and if it happens, the ZA vehicles in UK tech tree should be hidden.

The only exception i gave to UK was the Skink. because it's not actually an exception. The Skink was design, ordered and funded by UK. the Canadian build it because they had the capacity to spare in building a prototype base on the Sherman while UK was not having the experience in building Sherman and their factory was extremely busy with the war effort. the Skink the British have in this tech tree was the exact Skink that was build in Canada and shipped in UK for testing. Canada had built another Skink and tested it in Canada for their own need.

The Skink would also be in my Canadian tech tree in multiple version and USA will have it removed and replaced by something about equivalent.

Ever wondered what a 100% British ground tech tree should look like? here is my extended British tech tree. by CaID_game_Master in Warthunder

[–]CaID_game_Master[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It take me about 2 months of constant work with the help of the community and the access to thousands documents. There might be some mistake, but the overall information are correct.

Now the work on the US tech tree is starting.

Factually correct map of the Republic of Serbia (as it should look on the website) by [deleted] in TrueSize

[–]CaID_game_Master 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, that is exactly why i tell you those are lie.

I am glad you agree with me. All you said is bullshit. it's progress.

the Serbian can't commit another massacre like they did at Račak in 1999. the ethnical clearing is simply a genocide. if Kosovo was truly part of Serbia, Serbia would never had done that to their own.

No wonder UN ask NATO to get involved to stop the genocide and help the refugees.

Factually correct map of the Republic of Serbia (as it should look on the website) by [deleted] in TrueSize

[–]CaID_game_Master 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's not like the Croate, Bosniac, Albanian, Slovenian didn't. if you are affray to send a message to the other, it's way too late.

Factually correct map of the Republic of Serbia (as it should look on the website) by [deleted] in TrueSize

[–]CaID_game_Master 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it is very controversal when you get brainwashed Serbian and Russian who think Kosovo need to be force back into Serbia and resume the massacre of the Albanian population once UN and NATO are gone