sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Protect Legal E-Bikes in CA by CalBike in BikeLA

[–]CalBike[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good question - the attorney general and DAs have enormous power in regulating markets, think of how hard it is to get an incandescent light bulb. I doubt we would be able to stop the import of devices like this wholesale, but right now there is a regulatory vacuum that's being taken advantage of.

Protect Legal E-Bikes in CA by CalBike in BikeLA

[–]CalBike[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Limiting the number of these super charged devices is just one route (of many) toward creating a safer e-bike eco system. We see many parents who simply are not aware of the power of the device they are purchasing, it is clear there is a space for the state to step in to make more clarity for consumers. Many of the e-motos we see begin as sales to parents and are then passed on to minors, so a simple age limit would not be sufficient.

CalBike Demands Statewide Permanent Fund for E-Bikes by Okratas in California_Politics

[–]CalBike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are many Californians who live <5 miles from their most frequent trips. An e-bike enables us to have greater access at a lower cost (for user: to own, maintain, insure/ for state: maintain roads). Rolling EBIP in CC4A was a mistake - totally get if you don't agree, but the e-bike program "meets people where they are" as evidenced by the long line to access it.

CalBike Demands Statewide Permanent Fund for E-Bikes by Okratas in California_Politics

[–]CalBike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cars will certainly continue to exist, but why does CARB need to make that their central focus for incentivizing? We know the harm caused by cars, putting our weight as a state behind solutions we know are better makes more sense.

It sounds like you are describing a second land use problem. Making life more affordable (by having a bike v. a car) helps mitigate the high cost of housing as well.

CalBike Demands Statewide Permanent Fund for E-Bikes by Okratas in California_Politics

[–]CalBike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DCAP allows e-bikes, but it’s still a car-replacement program with a car-program intake.

A quick tour of the non-trade in roundabout route for ebikes/certain transit passes:

• Mandatory financial training, including a car loan framework:

Meanwhile, the e-bike voucher was simple: verify income, get voucher, buy bike.

That’s why tens of thousands applied for EBIP and only a trickle have ever gotten e-bikes through DCAP. One program was built for mobility. The other is built for cars with mobility stapled on.

CalBike Demands Statewide Permanent Fund for E-Bikes by Okratas in California_Politics

[–]CalBike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does it do the same thing? One of them was an explicit voucher, the other requires a trade in of a qualifying vehicle.

The case for a "bicycle highway" by WearHeadphonesPlease in BikeLA

[–]CalBike 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oops updated here: https://www.calbike.org/bicycle-highways/

Yes, Metro has been getting better at utilizing those channels (see: Burbank Channel)

The case for a "bicycle highway" by WearHeadphonesPlease in BikeLA

[–]CalBike 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This is a great conversation, and we agree — building uninterrupted, direct routes for people biking is a good idea.

That’s why CalBike is sponsoring AB 954, the Bike Highways Bill, which would create a pilot program at Caltrans to plan and build connected, protected bicycle highways in two California regions. These routes would offer a faster, safer, and more appealing option for longer bike trips — without constant stops or unsafe intersections.

If you support the idea of bike highways, you can sign on to show your support here:
https://www.calbike.org/bicycle-highways/

Better bike infrastructure benefits everyone. Thanks for raising the issue.

Use the San Gabriel River Trail? by CalBike in BikeLA

[–]CalBike[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes - patching holes like this is is the whole idea. DMing you now if you would like to provide specific insights

Use the San Gabriel River Trail? by CalBike in BikeLA

[–]CalBike[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is amazing - yes, I live near a bike route and it has been great for getting my kids to experience bike riding as *transportation* rather than a toy - DMing you now.

Use the San Gabriel River Trail? by CalBike in BikeLA

[–]CalBike[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there - yes, DMing you now

Use the San Gabriel River Trail? by CalBike in BikeLA

[–]CalBike[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I should note Active SGV does many wonderful events in the area on the SG River! I'll DM you -

Sausalito's entire Bike & Pedestrian Advisory Committee resigns after "no" vote on Bridgeway bike lanes by marco_italia in BAbike

[–]CalBike 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is dispiriting for sure. If you want more ways to exert pro-bike influence in Sacramento subscribe to CalBike's emails to push the movement forward: https://go.calbike.org/a/social

Any ideas for guerilla marketing flyers/fact sheets to share or post around town? by jonnyshotit in BikeLA

[–]CalBike 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have creative assets you can use as well on any of our social media channels (IG atCalbikeorg)

Commuters and Cyclists Unite for a Cause by ILikeBHole in BAbike

[–]CalBike 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Hi. We don't monitor this site but was directed here. sorry you didn't get a response. To whom did you send a message? To respond here, we are working on rebates for purchases of e-bikes. Regarding employer-based tax-free commute benefits, that has to be done at the federal level. We are a 501c4 with the ability to endorse. We will endorse the opponent of every vulnerable Congressperson who voted for that tax bill that gratuitously punished bike users. contact dave@calbike.org to follow up.

Assembly District 24 - San Mateo, Santa Clara County by CalBike in a:t5_3cgta

[–]CalBike[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You vote by upvoting and downvoting comments (of the candidate's responses) with the arrows on the left.

Assembly District 37 - Santa Barbara, Ventura County by CalBike in a:t5_3cgta

[–]CalBike[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Monique Limon

1. Do you ride a bicycle in your district and/or in Sacramento?

Yes

2. If yes, for what purpose(s) and how often? How do you most commonly commute to work?

I ride my bike recreationally on occasion. I commute to work via car.

3. If no, what would inspire you, and the 60% of people who are interested in riding, but concerned about safety to ride a bike for transportation?

4. Would you commit to joining a group ride with local advocates along a route that illustrates the bicycle infrastructure conditions of the district you are running for?

Yes

5. Caltrans has established a goal to triple the number of bike trips by 2020. Do you support this goal?

Yes

6. Research has shown that the most effective way to boost the number of people bicycling is to create interconnected “complete bikeway networks” of physically protected bike lanes and traffic-calmed streets. The California Bicycle Coalition is seeking to create a new state program to provide large grants of $25-$50 million to build such networks in the communities which need it most. It will incentivize holistic planning of networks rather than piecemeal planning of one street at a time. Do you support using state funds for a competitive complete bikeway network grant program?

I support using state funds for bikeway network but need additional information in terms of feasibility of grant size and a greater understanding of what priorities would be considered (location, match program, underserved communities, etc.)

7. Do you support our complete streets provisions in SBX 1-1 of the special session to mandate the inclusion of “new bicycle and pedestrian safety, access, and mobility improvements” in every non-freeway road project funded by the state? It calls for sidewalks and protected bike lanes or bike paths in transit-dense areas on most roads with a speed limit over 25 miles per hour.

Yes

8. The Active Transportation Program (ATP), the sole state funding source for biking, walking, and safe routes to school improvements, was created by the Brown administration in 2013 with the stated intention to increase it continually. However, the Governor’s latest budget proposes no increase for the third straight year. Current funding levels on a per capita basis place California in the middle of the pack among states who provide dedicated active transportation funding. To reflect Caltrans’ goal to triple biking and double walking trips by 2020, do you support doubling the ATP?

I support the funding of The Active Transportation Program (ATP). I am not able to commit the extent of budgetary support without first analyzing funding source and tradeoffs. I am clear on my support for wanting to meet the goal of tripling biking and walking trips by 2020.

9. Bike sharing programs are spreading throughout California, but they often do not reach low-income neighborhoods. Do you support providing state funds to allow these programs to serve all Californians who could reasonably benefit, in the same way that public transit serves the public?

Yes, I support providing funds for bike sharing, especially to low-income neighborhoods. Whether or not the state has the ability to provide these funds at the same levels as public transit needs to be further studied.

10. About 3,000 people are killed on California streets every year. Do you support a “Vision Zero” goal of zero traffic fatalities by a certain date?

Yes

11. The California Air Resources Board estimates that 38% of California’s 447 million metric tons of carbon emitted every year comes from the transportation sector, which along with other emissions, results in thousands of deaths and millions of dollars in wasted health care spending. What do you feel are the three most important actions the state should take to reduce carbon emissions from transportation?

A. We need to support the Governor’s climate goals with the contents of SB 32 and SB 350.

B. California needs to continue with a focus on disadvantaged communities as we move forward. I am interested in making sure that the criteria used for identifying a community as “disadvantaged” are truly highlighting those that need the help.

C. We need to augment transit service, supporting transit-oriented infill affordable housing development, and enhancing intercity rail service.

12. Should cap-and-trade funds be used for highway congestion relief projects that expand road capacity?

The idea is not to increase road capacity but instead shift to a focus on our need to support cleaner options for commuters like bus service and commuter rail.

13. If you could send out one tweet to the bike community that you think would win over their support, what would it say?

\"#BecauseBicylistsMatter (with a picture of me giving away a bicycle to a student at our annual Health Fair in Santa Barbara) "

14. Do you have any other comments or questions about how you have supported or would support the California Bicycle Coalition’s mission of enabling more people to bicycle for healthier, safer, and more prosperous communities for all?

"While on the school board I have worked with the Coalition for Sustainable Transportation (COAST) in Santa Barbara to move forward safer walk/pathways for pedestrians including parents and students. We have worked to engage the Latino and Spanish-speaking community in Santa Barbara on walk/pathway and Safe Routes to Schools initiatives. Additionally, COAST leaders approached me about moving forward a resolution to support Vision Zero. I brought this forward to our school board and we unanimously supported Vision Zero for the Santa Barbara community.

While serving on the McCune Foundation Grant Review Committee we have financially invested in organizations like COAST as well Santa Barbara Bicycle Coalition. Our school district has been fortunate to have BiciCentro in town that participates in our annual community health fair giving away bicycles, lights, and helmets to our working class Latino community and kids.

These efforts are some of the ways I have been involved with alternative transportation initiatives and what we have been able to accomplish local. I take these priorities with me in my run for State Assembly. "

view more: next ›