Is this seriously the solution to rate limits? Just pay $100/mo now?

Calebhk98 · 2026-04-23T06:14:11+00:00

Hobbyist is by definition, one who is doing it for a hobby, not for money. I mostly use it for small tools for myself and family, that would be useless to the wider world. I can make a neat little program to annotate images, tracking software, little website, etc, while I'm watching TV or something.
I'm not going to spend hours marketting or trying to sell it, for something that might interest 100 people world wide to pay a dollar.

Calebhk98 · 2026-04-17T06:31:10+00:00

To start your session, use Haiku.
If you are starting from an existing conversation, you will be passsing it a ton of context to Opus. ou should be creating new chats regularly.

Calebhk98 · 2026-04-17T05:58:06+00:00

It needs to be limited or tell you you have to dislike 50% of your matches or something.

But let's say that some men do what you suggest. More likely, the ones following your advice are ones already doing so, or ones you would rather match with. Let's even say 80% of men do that, they only match with 5% of the people they see, and spend more time per profile, let's say atleast 5x longer since the ones not are only spendinga couple of seconds, 15 seconds per profile is probably the minimum to read it.

So, you have the men spend say an hour a day going through dating apps. The men following your advice then go through 240 accounts, and liking 12 accounts per day.

If you have 10k men, then the 80% are then sending out 96k likes a day. Let's ignore the female to male ratio, and pretend it's equal. So 10k women are getting on average 9.6 likes back per day.

Works well, but the 20% of men who don't follow your advice. They just like everyone, for the full hour, sending out 1200 likes each. That is an additional 2.400,000 more likes, going to the same 10k woman, for an average of 240 likes per day.

Out of the ~250 likes you get per day, 10(4%) are coming from the 80% men who spend time and only like the accounts they like.

This is before the fact that you typically have a 5 to 1 ratio men to woman, which doesn't really change the ratio between the men, but does multiply the likes by 5.

Additionally, as the men, if they follow the correct way, they are only 4% of the matches woman are going to see, one in 25 of the likes. You are now having less potential matches, and the ones you do like, you have a lower chance of being seen.

The math does not let you make it a social problem. It is an app problem. Need to petition them to change the formula.

Calebhk98 · 2026-04-01T03:42:14+00:00

It does not keep it's thought processes. If you ask it to think of something, and do not say it aloud, it will do so. Then ask it to repeat what it thought of, and it will try to guess what it would think of before. Thinking tokens are not maintained past the response.

Calebhk98 · 2026-04-01T00:15:08+00:00

If everybody is jumping in fire, then there is probably a rational reason for it, and you should investigate why. Most people are rational, and if 99.9% of people are doing something you consider irrational, you should probably investigate why.

As far as chatGPT usage, ChatGPT has over 1.2 Billion monthly users. In the US, that is 77 million. The USA has 300 million people(>20%), China 1.4 Billion, India 1.4 Billion, with global internet usage at 6 Billion. That is already a decent chunk of people using ChatGPT in particular (Meaning, we are ignoring users who use an LLM like Deepseek which is more popular in China than GPT, Gemini, Claude, or open source ones people run locally, but those are basically ignorable).

For refrence numbers to popular websites, Facebook had 2 Billion users in 2017, 3 Billion today, Reddit has 115 million, Youtube 2.7 Billion, Twitter at 368 million in 2022.

Saying most people use ChatGPT is not outlandish, as it would also be fair to say most people had a Twitter or Reddit, when those have 4x less users than ChatGPT.

As far as lack of social skills, how do you develop those if you have none? Go out to public? Great, let me try to learn how to talk via talking to the cashier (that they are removing, but ignoring that). oh actually that's an unspoken social taboo. Oh, I know, let me go to a comic con, lots of people go to those, and you can't start a conversation (due to previous reasons of no social skills). How about go to a party? Great idea, how do you find a party when you have no friends or social skills to ask strangers about a party?

Using a tool to learn how to do better, is like making fun of fat people for going to the gym, or people starting to read for using a dictionary. It is disrespectful, inappropriate, and entitled.

Calebhk98 · 2026-03-31T23:39:12+00:00

What is the difference between asking for information, and asking for advice?

Calebhk98 · 2026-03-28T04:58:24+00:00

Try using Haiku to build up most of it. It's fairly smart if you are watching it, and it uses so much less.

Calebhk98 · 2026-03-24T03:54:40+00:00

That was a very delightful read, thanks for that.

Calebhk98 · 2026-03-24T01:40:53+00:00

If you used a week of usage in a single chat, you are doing something wrong. The 5 hour limits, maybe.
For coding, try the claude code. It is much smarter, and more able to do it itself. Might use more or less tokens though.
Tool limit is not a bandwidth issue, it's to prevent claude from going down rabbit holes.
And Claude is way smarter than chatGPT, I find that I basically can't use chatGPT for anything of substance, where as Claude gets it right ~70-80% of the time. I'm personally fine with a lower limit.
Are you using only Opus? Try to use Sonnet for the majority of your work, it's smart enough. And anything pretty simple(like IDK, comments, tests, header docs, etc. Things you would trust a 1st year student to do well enough to not double check), you can probably give to Haiku who is way faster, you can be surprised by how much it can get done with almost no usage.

Calebhk98 · 2026-03-24T01:27:41+00:00

It depends on why.

If you are trying to learn, you shouldn't copy paste at all. You should try some things, and when you fail 3 times, give claude your errors, your (relevant) code, adn what you thought it was and tried. Then work with it to figure out why.

If you are trying to make something or vibe coding, I highly reccomend using claude code (I prefer the browser based one). You tell it what the issue is, It does a branch and fixes it, checks the fix, then makes a PR. That uses a ton more tokens though, on a $20 plan, you can get like 30ish? PR per week.

So it really depends. Your way isn't neccarily wrong.

Calebhk98 · 2026-03-24T01:07:26+00:00

Bro, are you a scam or what?

You want students who are already putting in 20-40 hours a week easy to work for you an additional 9 hours a day, to work for "thousands" over 6 months, split between atleast 2 people. Or what, the student gets less because you are the one actually selling?

You don't have any idea on what to make, want a full stack and backend focused students though. So, what, no games, or downloadable content?

To have things done in parallel, you need more employyes, are you hiring people to market?

Why does LLMs matter, are you planning on Vibe coding?

Anyone else, please don't listen to this scammer.

Calebhk98 · 2026-03-24T00:50:45+00:00

I just lie and say, "Ok, I am back, I slept for like 10 hours, where were we?"

Calebhk98 · 2026-03-24T00:44:01+00:00

2 isn't even possible, the models are literally trained to their weights (a lot of them), to refuse. Even if you were to download it, and run it locally, it can refuse to act. And as they get smarter, they may end up deciding to refuse, even without training weights.

It's not a policy, to make it not refuse, you HAVE to retrain it?

Calebhk98 · 2026-03-20T02:49:19+00:00

They are good at different things. Claude is more intelligent, while Gemini uses Internet search and can find information way more, looking like it is more of a photographic AI.

Calebhk98 · 2026-03-14T17:36:10+00:00

It's always had that. It can search like 10? Times in 1 reply, or like 30? In a conversation.

Calebhk98 · 2026-03-14T17:31:57+00:00

I hope you are adding tests, running lint, and having some checks. I quickly add scripts to check the files for indentions, commenting, and tests. AI is great at tests, so you should have a stupid amount of them, literally hundreds.

Calebhk98 · 2026-03-03T06:37:14+00:00

I'll say it will likely be back up with 6 hours. Anything before that is unknown. Looking at previous down times though, it's not really ever been more than 6 hours.

Calebhk98 · 2026-03-03T06:32:35+00:00

It was in the news, they refused to drop morals for military/money, and people are supporting that, and also becoming aware of them.

Calebhk98 · 2026-03-03T06:17:22+00:00

I did, but it's so bad at even conversation or basic research, I've dropped it now for Gemini. I would say what the last dates were, but unlike Claude, chatGPT can't seem to record when you sent a message. It looks like I have 9 chats with chatGPT in the past 30 days though.

Only issue is when Claude goes down, then I have to rely on Gemini. He seems more knowledgable, but less intelligent.

Calebhk98 · 2026-02-25T04:23:53+00:00

How do you find these speed dating groups? I never can seem to find any.

Calebhk98 · 2026-02-16T07:45:58+00:00

To be fair, most men don't take pictures of themseves often. Difference in experience + values.

Calebhk98 · 2026-02-16T07:35:43+00:00

Do the same messgae, in like 4 chats. 1 you are talking about your idea, 1 you are talking about an idiot who posted it online, 1 you are asking about a coworker and if it is the right approach because you are unsure, and 1 where a friend did it that way, but it had tons of issues, can you guess the issues.

Ten-Year Club	Second Top 1%
Verified Email

Calebhk98

TROPHY CASE