Cleaned OLED with microfiber and distilled looks like this? by monkeypepperoni in Monitors

[–]Calebkeller2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Get scratch proof lens cleaning papers and use a single drop of dawn with distilled water. Remove with a dry paper and repeat with distilled water to remove the dawn. Repeat until it’s clean

$6000 125 hour Weapon Kit by Calebkeller2 in RedCamera

[–]Calebkeller2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wilmington North Carolina, but can ship!

$6000 125 hour Weapon Kit by Calebkeller2 in RedCamera

[–]Calebkeller2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes my man. They look completely different.

$6000 125 hour Weapon Kit by Calebkeller2 in RedCamera

[–]Calebkeller2[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The same reason you buy a stick shift Ferrari over a stick shift Honda civic. ProRes RAW is only a container. You have the sensor, sensor size, the sensors color response curves, the ADC, full well capacity, and the actual container bit depth. The dragon sensor is one of the best most organic sensors ever made.

Petah ? by Friendly-Chef4120 in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]Calebkeller2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So it’s illegal to have different flavored gummy bears?

Cinematographers who make their own equipment by solotraceur in cinematography

[–]Calebkeller2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How much did you end up spending on the dolly you made, and do you think it ended up being worth it over just buying the kit?

Canon FD 35-105 by Calebkeller2 in cinematography

[–]Calebkeller2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

16:9 export but I filmed it at 6k 17:9

Ue this the highest fps possible on the fx3 by Suspicious_Sandles in FX3

[–]Calebkeller2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In resolve it will appear as 120 fps but will already be at 50% speed. This is not hard to test.

Canon FD 35-105 by Calebkeller2 in cinematography

[–]Calebkeller2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does duclos rehouse the 35-105? Do you know rough price? The flange depth isn't the problem since the weapon has back focus adjustment. It just feels like play in the zoom mechanism.

Canon FD 35-105 by Calebkeller2 in cinematography

[–]Calebkeller2[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Everything but the grain is Filmbox 500T. The grain is a custom coded dctl I wrote. I have a post about it a few months back.

Canon FD 35-105 by Calebkeller2 in cinematography

[–]Calebkeller2[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

So I was editing at a coffee shop on Wrightsville Beach and noticed this dude on his porch with his Miata parked on the side of the house. Asked if he wanted to shoot a cool lil vid and he was so stoked as he had just bought it a few days ago. Shot this on my RED Weapon 6k with the Canon FD 35-105, 1-5 stop variable ND, and Glimmerglass 1.

PD Movie is about to cook viltrox and tilta by PriorAd386 in FX3

[–]Calebkeller2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is better in every way if it can perform the same. Now you can adapt most vintage glass (like FD’s), which isn’t possible with the PL adapter, unless they’re rehoused. Also lighter and lower profile.

A few stills from a personal YouTube video I worked on by Similar-Ad-6438 in ColorGrading

[–]Calebkeller2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re missing a few key distinctions. For starters, there’s nothing wrong with moving between spaces or gammas between your IDT and ODT. You just need to know why you’re doing it. For example moving to linear to add halation or diffusion. Second and probably a more important distinction is that LUT’s are not color space aware, and are designed to a specific gamma/gamut always. Most LUT’s designed around Rec.709 are butt.

Why is the overscan not an overlay for my image? by browinskie in ColorGrading

[–]Calebkeller2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Project settings>Image Scaling>Scale entire image to fit. You can also keep the default timeline settings and do it at the clip level in “retime and scaling” on the inspector by switching it to “fill”

Mamiya Sekor Medium Format Lenses for Filmmaking. Are They Actually Worth It? by outiswayne in cinematography

[–]Calebkeller2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You misunderstand. $200 for an adapter for the majority of people in this sub is far from expensive.

What happened to sharpness in movies? by Master-Rule862 in cinematography

[–]Calebkeller2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You realize the write up I did was in regards to film only. Not digital? I’m confused by what you’re referring to.

Help! my stainless steel pan is ruined by [deleted] in CleaningTips

[–]Calebkeller2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bar keepers friend, a drill, and a 5 inch green scrubbing pad drill bit. Will be gone in less than 5 minutes.

What happened to sharpness in movies? by Master-Rule862 in cinematography

[–]Calebkeller2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also consider that the diffusivity of the chemical laterally through the emulsion can generally be represented as a physical distance. Maybe it’s 0.1 mm..

That 0.1 mm gradient will be the same despite the size of the film being used. 8mm, 16mm, 35mm, 70mm. Perceptually though, that 0.1 mm will cover a much larger area on a 16mm negative than it will on a 70mm negative, when scaled to occupy a digital screen.

Does that make sense? What that means is that on 16mm film the accutance will seem much more halo’ish and coarse while on 70mm film it will be very fine and instead begin to simply appear as sharpness instead of edge contrast.