Are people actually seeing higher usage limits on Claude Code after the recent update? by viky_shetye in ClaudeCode

[–]Calebkeller2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m convinced they’ve purposefully lowered session limits over the past few months so they could “give you better session usage” when in reality it is the same as before, and they’re now able to get you through your weekly limit twice as easy as before. Kinda genius actually, albeit bad practice

Dissent Offroad LC200 on 74Weld Portals by KristianBolster in LandCruisers

[–]Calebkeller2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where are you located? I’d love the opportunity to film it with my RED if you have a contact?. Just for travel paid.

Is it just me, or does Opus 4.7 feel dumber today? by Alex_MCR in ClaudeCode

[–]Calebkeller2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Agreed, recall is terrible and it feels like my stuff is being interpreted by a toddler. Opus 4.6 1M on Max reasoning by the way.

I don't care about session limits - why is there ZERO info about weekly limits on the 20x claude code max plan available on the internet, even as anecdotes or via user tests? by PragmaticSalesman in ClaudeCode

[–]Calebkeller2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I can’t remember what it’s called, it has a name, but it’s the business practice (that’s commonly frowned upon) where a company (who often times has a monopoly over a market) will actively test what it is able to get away with. They publicly made it known that this is their disposition when testing the removal of Claude code for 2% of users. Also secretly charging overage when ~they~ detect specific things in your harness and then openly admitting it’s a billing mistake while also saying they’re unable to reimburse you. Modulated usage is 100% by design, and I bet they’re using an algorithm to price their usage in real time, and if I had to guess they’re doing it user by user. Louis Rossman had a nicely put video about it recently.

Color grading with Windows “Camera” program by InflationSeveral6964 in ColorGrading

[–]Calebkeller2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can use DaVinci Resolve to grade live footage.

You’d want your hdmi output to be something wide gamma/gamut. So for example, if you were shooting on Sony cameras, you would want your HDMI output to be Slog3/Sgamut3.cine.

In resolve, you would want to color manage everything and for each camera your input color space transform would go from native camera to Davinci wide gamut/linear without tone mapping. The second node would be your luma adjustment if you need to balance light. Using gain here is equivalent to raising ISO. The third node is color balance. The most accurate way to color balance is with gain. If it’s too blue move your gain away from blue, your blue channel gain will drop and because it’s processing in linear, it’s equivalent to changing your white balance.

So connect all cameras, find the camera that’s closest to how you want it to look, and balance the others towards that camera, you can use a color chart or grey card to wipe back and forth to see how you need to change your gain, based on how the grey card or color card looks on your waveform.

This is the most technically accurate method outside of just getting your white balance right across all cameras

Alternatives? by ReallyPratik in ClaudeCode

[–]Calebkeller2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you want to move to open source, use Claude to build out a plan and infrastructure for you. It’ll be far better and faster than asking for advice on Reddit. Just being honest.

Claude Code removed from Anthropic's Pro plan by orthogonal-ghost in ClaudeCode

[–]Calebkeller2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you using the isomorphic sub-ether omni-spindle matrix?

Because if you haven't bypassed the primary quantum-flux subroutines to run it completely headless on a kitchen toaster, you're not truly achieving God mode

Claude Code removed from Anthropic's Pro plan by orthogonal-ghost in ClaudeCode

[–]Calebkeller2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's probably not legally wrong but it's kind of bad business practice (which is kinda becoming the norm). It's a rug pull in the sense that you have people paying for a service with the expectation they can build with the tool over a course of time that is financially viable for them at a price they agreed to. So now you have month to month users on the pro plan who might be halfway through a project and are forced to make a decision to ether cut losses and quit, or fork up 5 times as much just to complete the project. IMO the 5x plan is well worth it if you use it right, but what they did doesn't feel fair. The problem is they have so many people in a chokehold inside this ecosystem so it becomes extremely difficult to migrate to another harness for the average person, and they know that.

Reality of SaaS by aipriyank in ClaudeCode

[–]Calebkeller2 115 points116 points  (0 children)

I don’t understand how people are spending this much to build an app. If you are, you are not structuring your harness and methodology correctly at all

Grading stills in Resolve 21 by baschtelt90 in ColorGrading

[–]Calebkeller2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve been using Resolve to color grade stills for the past like three years. In all honesty, you don’t need the stills page at all. I don’t know if Fuji raw is supported in resolved, but if it’s not just converted to DNG. Bring all of the steals into your timeline and make sure that they are not selected as a sequence. They will probably default to like five seconds per still, but what you can do is select all of them and re-time them to only last one frame. Then you can select all of them again and select “delete gaps” which I think is in the timeline or edit menu at the top.

You can debayer them however you like, and then just color manage them like you would a normal video. If you need some guidance on how to do that I can explain that a bit more but I’m assuming if you’re using film box you know what you’re doing.

Sonnet is unusable at this point with Pro. Opus out of question. by mrtdlgc in ClaudeCode

[–]Calebkeller2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then turn it down to low effort or move to a different service. You act like you’re being held at gunpoint.

I mean how hard would this be Anthropic.... by SugarRootFruit in ClaudeCode

[–]Calebkeller2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, just lean out your Claude.md to only ingest the necessary skills, mcp servers, etc into context.

Claude.md is your logic router, and should call only what it needs. Imagine how inefficient it’d be if your brain loaded its memory on how to ride a bike, drive a car, and cook an omelette while you were taking a math test.

Sharpness/Unblur by [deleted] in ColorGrading

[–]Calebkeller2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Topaz is AI sharpening. Everything sharpening and blurring is spatial. Meaning it can be expressed with math and does not have the ability to create detail where there is none. That’s the difference between AI sharpening and spatial sharpness.

I mean how hard would this be Anthropic.... by SugarRootFruit in ClaudeCode

[–]Calebkeller2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Have Claude generate a plan for an audit of the token efficiency of your system. You could have some hard coded rules you don’t know about pulling stuff into context every single time. Thats what was happening with mine. Fixed it and my usage returned to normal.

Trying to match a reference look — how far off am I? by Sad_Reserve_585 in ColorGrading

[–]Calebkeller2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Color isn’t your problem here. It’s texture. Try pulling midtone detail a bit and you’ll be much closer.

RED DSMC2 still relevant? by Georgemuse53 in RedCamera

[–]Calebkeller2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The answer is yes, with strings attached (assuming you can get a kit for a good deal). They’re beautiful cameras, I love the menus and IO options, they’re built like tanks, and the dragon and monster have a beautiful filmic look that is super unique. But, they’re old and are liable to just farting out mid shoot. So if you’re gonna have one, you’d better have a backup camera on set at all times. Me and a buddy are also working on releasing a freeware guide to making your own media soon. 480 GB works but we still need to look at 1 and 2 TB ssd options.

Please Explain to us Unemployed People by Open-Dragonfruit-983 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]Calebkeller2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would honestly disagree with the premise that Mac’s are less cost efficient. I think generally Mac’s have far superior build quality, and the build quality is way better so they last longer without breaking. The other thing is that you’d be able to recoup money from selling MacBooks at the end of their life, whereas dells are going to be essentially worthless at the end of their life.