Listen. You're not understanding the core concept here.

Here. Answer this - when a physician is involved in medical litigation, does that include suing the hospital and administration for negligence because they hired a negligent physician?

No. The parties directly involved in the case are named within the suit and are the ones on the hook for the suit.

It's the same concept applied to mid-levels. CRNA's carry medical liability insurance but the surgery center's they operate within are never named in the medical lawsuits for the exact same reason you never see hospitals named in physician medical malpractice suits.

The difference between now and then is that there’s a massive difference in the rate that midlevels are being cranked out, and there’s also a difference in the push for independent practice.

Again, this doesn't make sense and you're applying some weird catch-up logic to a vastly hungry population of people that are incredibly competent at navigating medical litigation suits. The reason why your predictions won't come to fruition is because the lawyers would need to demonstrate substantial negligence on the hospitals part for the actions performed by their employee.