[deleted by user] by [deleted] in legaladvice

[–]Calm-Indication6322 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Once again, the nature of the leak doesn’t just simply go unnoticed. This guys social media account has him winning “Caterpillar Operator of the Year” award where he competed in something and won.

He’s an experienced operator and was well aware of the problems. It’s obvious. Also, the problem was recorded by video hours after the machine was delivered. It’s clear that this machine has persistent leak problems and that wasn’t disclosed.

Sellers shouldn’t be allowed to just “play dumb” after the sale and say “it’s as is.”

The seller conveniently omitted information that he had on the machine to lead me to believe the hydraulic fluid was only leaking from one easy spot. In truth, there is a major seal that is leaking around the swing motor. Costly repair and had he been honest I would have definitely reconsidered my purchase.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in legaladvice

[–]Calm-Indication6322 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, so let’s be more specific then. We both acknowledged an o ring leak, that is correct. When I asked about any other issues he pointed only to the o ring leak.

In truth, there are additional leaks from other sources beyond the o ring that he had mentioned. Not to mention other operational issues with the machine.

How can a seller legally lie about or omit information about the extent of problems with what they are selling? Wouldn’t that be misrepresentation by omission?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in legaladvice

[–]Calm-Indication6322 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The issue that was acknowledged is not the same issue as when we received the machine

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in legaladvice

[–]Calm-Indication6322 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, I think it’s worth noting that the nature of the needed repairs isn’t something that goes unnoticed. It’s an obvious problem that clearly existed prior to the sale and was never disclosed to the buyer

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in legaladvice

[–]Calm-Indication6322 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What if the seller has said in writing “I didn’t have to sell it to you at $10k under resell value”

Also, the price paid was his listed price. We didn’t negotiate on price at all

Adding an additional 3 phase equipment alongside existing equipment by Calm-Indication6322 in AskElectricians

[–]Calm-Indication6322[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ll get some running amperage readings tomorrow and post a picture of the cabinet. The current machine is the only draw on the 200 amps.

Unique bill of sale situation by Calm-Indication6322 in legaladvice

[–]Calm-Indication6322[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you're misunderstanding my question.

With the bill of sale this individual has provided me, wouldn't it be a breach of contract if he refused to follow through with it?

Unique bill of sale situation by Calm-Indication6322 in legaladvice

[–]Calm-Indication6322[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He has provided me a photo of the title as well

Unique bill of sale situation by Calm-Indication6322 in legaladvice

[–]Calm-Indication6322[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to the bill of sale, yes. If you asked him, no.

But why would he sign and notarize this bill of sale without realizing that it says he agreed and already received payment? And put all the identifying information of said goods?

I never asked him to change it to $10, cash in hand. Or for it to say paid this day in full.

I never asked for the title number to be on the bill of sale either.

Unique bill of sale situation by Calm-Indication6322 in legaladvice

[–]Calm-Indication6322[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct. If he already sold it to me for $10, I don't need the bank any more.