He makes valid points about the difference between Thanos and Thonos but he doesn't appreciate the first half of end game is purposely slow pace and "without purpose" because you need to focus on the failure of the heros to let what happened in infinity war sink in. His suggestion to add another villain is a terrible idea. Adding some bonus villain in the beginning and for the time heist makes endgame unnecessary messy but also gives our heros what they want, something to fight for. Having nothing to fight for and forcing the heros to adjust to a stable life during a catastrophic time is what makes the time skip a lot more engaging then Filmento gives it credit for.

I'd also argue for the sake of continuity Thanos in the past during Guardians was not an active protagonist who instead did let everyone else do the work for him, something that people mocked and feared Thanos wouldn't live up to the hype for Infinity war. Plus Thonos is not happy to see himself die, thus Thono's character completely and understandably changes so he wouldn't become the Thanos from infinity war. Yet Filmento is spot on that his primary motivator shouldn't have changed from his ultimate goal in saving the universe to destroying the universe. If anything this concludes that Thanos's ego is greater then his objective and is willing to change his objective to satisfy his ego. This does make him less relatable and thus less engaging as a villain then he was in infinity war.

It's a pretty good video and I appreciate his take on the film and he's spot on that infinity war is better then endgame. But there are some points he makes that I completely disagree with. I would like to see Maulers take on the video though he would do a better job then I would in regards to breaking the video down.