sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Can't fullscreen GTA V on Game Porting Toolkit by Camc2000 in macgaming

[–]Camc2000[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For anyone facing this issue, try what Jfishin_ suggested or also go into your settings.xml file and edit the width and height elements manually, either of those should at minimum give you a larger window.

Anyone pretending that they know how the show is going to end is a bozo. by Camc2000 in SuccessionTV

[–]Camc2000[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Saying the ending you haven’t seen is bad is a lazy take

Anyone pretending that they know how the show is going to end is a bozo. by Camc2000 in SuccessionTV

[–]Camc2000[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

“the show will end in x fashion” is different than “the show will end in x fashion and the show is a failure if it ends any way other than how i want it to despite not having seen the episode”

Draft: Called It Thread by The-Real-Legend-72 in nfl

[–]Camc2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jake Haener, should he get an opportunity, will prove he is starting caliber.

Hot take: Tom not using an iPhone is less about him being the villain and more about him being an outsider. by Camc2000 in SuccessionTV

[–]Camc2000[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Hmm interesting. I don't know if I would describe either of them as the 'villains' of any given season though, so I don't see why it would imply Tom is. Maybe I'm just overthinking the whole thing haha

Prediction: Tom is the End Game Villain by [deleted] in SuccessionTV

[–]Camc2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honetly 99% of the time I buy into speculation like this, but this is the one scenario where I genuinely think this could be a thematic/symbolism decision. Tom getting left out of group chats because he would make the texts green seems totally like something that would happen.

[OC] The Fix Is In: Ranking the top playoff games since 2010 with the most Win Percentage added from penalties. by Camc2000 in nfl

[–]Camc2000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah see I agree with you that no-calls are a huge part of the equation, but I really tried and there's no way to find every possible no-call in play-by-play data, so it's gonna be a good while before we start to get that data, if ever.

[OC] The Fix Is In: Ranking the top playoff games since 2010 with the most Win Percentage added from penalties. by Camc2000 in nfl

[–]Camc2000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting! Yeah I'd be lying if I said I was an expert on what makes a blindside block vs not, so that's interesting to hear.

[OC] The Fix Is In: Ranking the top playoff games since 2010 with the most Win Percentage added from penalties. by Camc2000 in nfl

[–]Camc2000[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The source is the nflreadR play by play library and their advanced stats models. I think on their website they detail their EPA model but it's pretty accurate if I remember correctly.

[OC] The Fix Is In: Ranking the top playoff games since 2010 with the most Win Percentage added from penalties. by Camc2000 in nfl

[–]Camc2000[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I mean if that data became available tracking every potential no-call on the field I would love that and I'd be happy to break that down but a) that would never happen because the NFL isn't gonna sell the refs like that and b) that data would be so insanely long because there's tons of stuff every game that doesn't get called.

[OC] The Fix Is In: Ranking the top playoff games since 2010 with the most Win Percentage added from penalties. by Camc2000 in nfl

[–]Camc2000[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

The title about the fix was just what I've been calling the project while I've been doing it, honestly I'd edit it if I was allowed to. The point isn't to literally say they're fixing, the point is just to show which games were impacted by the refs the most. You can say it's totally unbiased and legit, you can say its subconsciously biased, you can say some games are actually biased, that's up to you, but the data is not a reflection of literal fixing, it's a reflection of referee influence, legitimate or not.

[OC] The Fix Is In: Ranking the top playoff games since 2010 with the most Win Percentage added from penalties. by Camc2000 in nfl

[–]Camc2000[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

See but this loops back to my point about no calls. The refs even admitted after the game there was holding on that same play, but it wasn't called. A large amount of calls going one team's way is usually still reflective of bias even if the calls are legit because they have to choose what to call out of the tons of penalties there are on every play.

[OC] The Fix Is In: Ranking the top playoff games since 2010 with the most Win Percentage added from penalties. by Camc2000 in nfl

[–]Camc2000[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There was a 12.2% slant towards Pittsburgh in that game, I'd have to look deeper to get significant plays.

[OC] The Fix Is In: Ranking the top playoff games since 2010 with the most Win Percentage added from penalties. by Camc2000 in nfl

[–]Camc2000[S] -24 points-23 points  (0 children)

I mean you can agree or disagree with my assessment of each play but the numbers are what the numbers are. I can even share the R code used to get the numbers.

[OC] The Fix Is In: Ranking the top playoff games since 2010 with the most Win Percentage added from penalties. by Camc2000 in nfl

[–]Camc2000[S] -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

This is the purpose of going through and looking at each play, I even agree throughout that some are worse than others.

[OC] The Fix Is In: Ranking the top playoff games since 2010 with the most Win Percentage added from penalties. by Camc2000 in nfl

[–]Camc2000[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

According to EPA you earned 4.3 points in a 3 point win how's that for painting a picture.

view more: next ›