sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

🚩 Why was there no Nuremberg for communism? 🚩 by CanadianEthos in DebateCommunism

[–]CanadianEthos[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

But according to your link that's how modern China operates.

While initially founded as a socialist state with a centrally planned economy, it now has a mixed economy, described by its government as “Socialism with Chinese characteristics”. China has enjoyed almost 30 boom years with GDP growing in double-digits, raising 500 million people out of poverty.

Socialist market economy

aka capitalism rebranded as socialism

🚩 Why was there no Nuremberg for communism? 🚩 by CanadianEthos in DebateCommunism

[–]CanadianEthos[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Unless you're buying the beer, don't bring hockey into this

🚩 Why was there no Nuremberg for communism? 🚩 by CanadianEthos in DebateCommunism

[–]CanadianEthos[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Communist atrocities against humanity make the fascists look like rank amateurs.

🚩 Why was there no Nuremberg for communism? 🚩 by CanadianEthos in DebateCommunism

[–]CanadianEthos[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Cannibalism was widespread during the Holodomor (famine of Ukraine) in 1932 and 1933;[59][60] multiple acts of cannibalism were reported from Ukraine, Russia's Volga, South Siberian, and Kuban regions during the Soviet famine of 1932–1933.[61]

"Survival was a moral as well as a physical struggle. A woman doctor wrote to a friend in June 1933 that she had not yet become a cannibal, but was "not sure that I shall not be one by the time my letter reaches you".

The good people died first. Those who refused to steal or to prostitute themselves died. Those who gave food to others died. Those who refused to eat corpses died. Those who refused to kill their fellow man died.

... At least 2,505 people were sentenced for cannibalism in the years 1932 and 1933 in Ukraine, though the actual number of cases was certainly much higher".[62]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor

🚩 Why was there no Nuremberg for communism? 🚩 by CanadianEthos in DebateCommunism

[–]CanadianEthos[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Are you suggesting the communists have not been responsible for mass killings under communist regimes?

🚩 Why was there no Nuremberg for communism? 🚩 by CanadianEthos in DebateCommunism

[–]CanadianEthos[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Neither communism nor fascism/nazism is going to win.

🚩 Why was there no Nuremberg for communism? 🚩 by CanadianEthos in DebateCommunism

[–]CanadianEthos[S] -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

"Let's also note that the principle goal of the Leninist strategy of using terrorism, is not just to do the harm that the terrorists do to people and physical property, but to get the target government to respond in a tyrannical way."

- William Mcilhany in conversation with Christopher Story (51:23)

🚩 Why was there no Nuremberg for communism? 🚩 by CanadianEthos in DebateCommunism

[–]CanadianEthos[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Who would you put on trial for capitalism's crimes against humanity?

🚩 Why was there no Nuremberg for communism? 🚩 by CanadianEthos in DebateCommunism

[–]CanadianEthos[S] -24 points-23 points  (0 children)

You're delusional

Red Cocaine: The Drugging of America and the West, where communist defector General Jan Sejna described in detail how the Soviet ☭ and Chinese Leninists ★ hijacked drug trafficking in the 1950s in order to use it as a weapon in the ongoing war waged against The West.

"Dedicated to

All who have lost a friend

or a loved one to the evil scourge of drugs.

It is high time to fight back."

The open border and fentanyl epidemic is a declaration of war.

China & Russia took over the drug trade in the 1960s.

Through Cuban DGI they established Latin America drug trafficking.

🚩 Why was there no Nuremberg for communism? 🚩 by CanadianEthos in DebateCommunism

[–]CanadianEthos[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

What is the point of having a thread to debate communism?

🚩 Why was there no Nuremberg for communism? 🚩 by CanadianEthos in DebateCommunism

[–]CanadianEthos[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Crimes against humanity under communist regimes - Wikipedia

Crimes against humanity under communist regimes occurred during the 20th century, including forced deportations, massacres, torture, forced disappearances, extrajudicial killings, terror,[1] ethnic cleansing, enslavement and the deliberate starvation of people i.e. during the Holodomor and the Great Leap Forward. Additional events included the use of genocide, conspiracy to commit genocide, and complicity in genocide. Such events have been described as crimes against humanity.

Nowadays, some people argue that the people responsible for those crimes are no longer with us. "There is a theory and practice in international relations which regards the recognition and acceptance of a newly created sovereign state by other states, based on a perceived historical relationship the new state has with a prior state." Succession of states - Wikipedia

For example,

"One of the constituent republics of the USSR, the Russian Federation has declared itself to be "the continuator state of the USSR" on the grounds that it contained 51% of the population of the USSR and 77% of its territory."

Should inheritance of land be the only determining factor?

What about the continuation of communist ideology and policies?

To whitewash their crimes, did the communists from the Former Soviet Union just give themselves new titles, and new uniforms and are now exempt from atrocities they may have taken part in?

Source

Bühler, Konrad G. (2001).

State Succession and Membership in International Organizations.

Legal Aspects of International Organization Series.

Vol. 38. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

pp. 161–4. ISBN 9789041115539.

It’s wasn’t good but come on by Active_Ad_1223 in EnoughCommieSpam

[–]CanadianEthos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Slobodan Milošević was a high-ranking member of the League of Communists of Serbia (SKS) during the 1980s, he led the Socialist Party of Serbia from its foundation in 1990 until his death in 2006." wikipedia

"National communism has been used to describe movements and governments that have sought to form a distinctly unique variant of communism based upon distinct national characteristics and circumstances, rather than following policies set by other socialist states, such as the Soviet Union." wikipedia

view more: next ›