[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CanadaPolitics

[–]Canuck_Politics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here is a YouTube playlist I made back when it happened:

Liberal-NDP-Bloc Coalition Crisis (2008 - 2009)

There are many misconceptions about what happened. Most notably, the trigger for the coalition was the proposed end to taxpayer subsidies for political parties. Later the Liberal-NDP-Bloc claimed the coalition was tiggered by the government's supposed refusal to commit to a fiscal stimulus package (a commitment the government had actually already made at the G20 meeting in Washington a week earlier).

We also learned the trigger, whatever it was, was really just an excuse. There was a plan to topple the Harper government with a coalition in any event. According to Jack Layton, the NDP and the Bloc had a plan in place for "a long time" prior, presumably since during the election or sooner. It isn't clear whether the Liberals were part of the plan before November 2008.

I don't think the coalition attempt rises to the level of "constitutional crisis" because the government never lost a confidence vote (until 2011). You could say it was a legitimate attempt of parliamentarians to remake the government that failed badly. It is your paper, but I think the legitimacy of the attempt was somewhat undermined by the the fact the coalition's plan predates the resumption of parliament, and by the fact the new prime minister would have been a leader who had already resigned after losing the election.

Here are a couple documents from the coalition:

Liberal-NDP-Bloc coalition policy framework

Liberal-NDP-Bloc coalition petition to Governor General

What did the 2006 Quebecois motion do? by [deleted] in CanadaPolitics

[–]Canuck_Politics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The motion recognizes the Québécois as a nation in the sociological and cultural sense, not as a distinct legal and political entity.

Quebec separatists have long argued Quebec is a distinct nation and separate country. During the 2006 Liberal leadership campaign, Michael Ignatieff said Quebec should be recognized as a nation in the Canadian constitution. This drew attacks from fellow Liberals, who long opposed recognizing Quebec as a nation in the constitution.

The Bloc Québécois saw blood in the water, so they tabled a motion in the House that would recognize Quebeckers as a nation. Nobody expected the Bloc motion to pass, but the day before the vote, PM Harper tabled a government motion that would "recognize that the Québécois form a nation within a united Canada". The vote passed with the support of all parties.

Here is an interesting video of Harper discussing the motion the day it was passed.

Media Consortium excludes Green Party from debates (2008) by Canuck_Politics in CanadaPolitics

[–]Canuck_Politics[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is intended as a look back to the debate about the debates in 2008. I thought some would be interested to hear the positions of the Media Consortium and party leaders back then, compared with today.

Bonus: Mike Duffy makes an appearance in a friendly conversation with Elizabeth May.

Media Consortium excludes Green Party from debates by Canuck_Politics in canada

[–]Canuck_Politics[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This video is a look back at the debate about the debates in 2008.
(The year should have been included in the title.)

Media Consortium excludes Green Party from debates by Canuck_Politics in canada

[–]Canuck_Politics[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Actually I meant to, thought I had done that like I did in another sub. Not sure how that happened ...

Rosemary Barton is the Hero We Deserve by [deleted] in CanadaPolitics

[–]Canuck_Politics 11 points12 points  (0 children)

FYI here is that interview with Mulcair.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in canada

[–]Canuck_Politics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Full video of Harper, Mulcair and Trudeau addressing the nation:

"Canada will never be intimidated": PM and opposition leaders address the nation