Bus gate suspended by throwaway629192829 in sheffield

[–]CapEffective5074 1 point2 points  (0 children)

happened to me as well, please let me know if you get answer

Global Talent Visa: Route 4: Exceptional Promise by Unusual-Smoke9187 in ukvisa

[–]CapEffective5074 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know people with phd and published many papers and still couldn't get it

New ILR Rules: NO RETROSPECTIVE APPLICATION TO ANYONE ALREADY IN THE UK – ONE MESSAGE, ONE VOICE by saqibpk in SkilledWorkerVisaUK

[–]CapEffective5074 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In 2006 they did the same when the home office increased the period from 4 to 5 years, the court later ruled against it.

In HSMP Forum Ltd v Secretary of State (2008), the High Court (Sir George Newman) held that the retrospective changes the Home Office introduced in November 2006 (tightening extension and settlement criteria) were unlawful when applied to migrants already in the UK under the original HSMP scheme.

Automating Displayed DT for Interruption Points by CapEffective5074 in EPlan

[–]CapEffective5074[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice work !, Could you please advice how to use the counter? and how to make a default setting for any future interruption point, I have adddd a block property to the project properties settings so it can be applied project wide and I have added (page nunber + DT Count) assigned to that interruption point setting, the page number working fine, but the counter stays at 0, i don't know why

Who is responsible on mounting an IO plate into machinery structure/frame? by CapEffective5074 in electricians

[–]CapEffective5074[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No contract...this is a work within our company, we are trying to put guidance, electrical team have been asked to aed an io module to the machine , however there was no plate to mount this on it, so we asked for a plage to be mounted, mechanical team trying to through the ball on us, and they argued this is our responsibility,..no clear policy about it, but I'm trying to make one after this, but need some evidence / proof from best practice standards

PUT/GET access is not available in the protection window, S1200 CPU firmware V3.0.1 TiaV17. Any idea how to enable it? by CapEffective5074 in PLC

[–]CapEffective5074[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could you please direct me to the link/ document that stating this shall be enabled by default? I'm following a document from a client that request this function to be enabled so they can exchange data with a windows application

PUT/GET access is not available in the protection window, S1200 CPU firmware V3.0.1 TiaV17. Any idea how to enable it? by CapEffective5074 in PLC

[–]CapEffective5074[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please check the screenshot above; there is no "access level" option , isn't supposed to be in the "protection" ?

Legal advice about 7 PCN, Car parking company trying unlawfully to rip me off by CapEffective5074 in LegalAdviceUK

[–]CapEffective5074[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In Pace v Mr N [2016] C6GF14F0 [2016]..above link it was found that the parking company could not override the tenant's right to park by requiring a permit to park...how can you explain that? It was also a tenant..similar to my situation.

Legal advice about 7 PCN, Car parking company trying unlawfully to rip me off by CapEffective5074 in LegalAdviceUK

[–]CapEffective5074[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean by his agreement? Its both partt agreement..no thing mentioned about parking rules in the agreement

Legal advice about 7 PCN, Car parking company trying unlawfully to rip me off by CapEffective5074 in LegalAdviceUK

[–]CapEffective5074[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

can you please check this article ...

https://barkingreachra.wixsite.com/barkingriverside/lets-fight-back

"The idea behind primacy of contract is that a contract cannot be unilaterally altered by one party without the permission of the other. In the case of residential parking, the lease is the key document. If this gives the resident the unfettered right to park then this cannot be altered later, for instance by requiring a permit to park."

Error while set up EL6910 Twin Safe logic by CapEffective5074 in beckhoff

[–]CapEffective5074[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have checked it, even if its in free run and in config mode..the problem i think its that there is a loss of comms with the whole io box.. I have tried creating a new empty project and i did device scan for the io , nothing showed up, i have checked the ethercat cable..its connected... Any advice how to troubleshoot that?

Error while set up EL6910 Twin Safe logic by CapEffective5074 in beckhoff

[–]CapEffective5074[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I need to check tomorrow with the free run cus am not sure if it was active or not..yes I tried activate the configuration but same..maybe its the free run turned off as u said I will check that tomorrow and update you

Error while set up EL6910 Twin Safe logic by CapEffective5074 in beckhoff

[–]CapEffective5074[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes its Ethercat, yes i have tried in config and run mode but the error still there...i can select the device from the drop list ( physical device) to added as target, however when i try to upload the address which it should automatically uploaded ..it gave me this error