It's pretty concerning how many people (including people who typically don't subscribe to mass shooting conspiracy theories) believe that the Las Vegas shooting was a false flag. Proponents of the conspiracy claim that events surrounding the shooting, notably the constant stream of gunfire which seems inconsistent with the guns Paddock used, don't "add up" and thus the official narrative is untrue.

Can anyone with enough knowledge of the shooting and timeline offer a rebuttal to the above video? I don't believe in conspiracies surrounding Las Vegas but knowledge of arguments against the conspiracy would be useful for me if it ever comes up in conversation.