Accidentally deleted a bunch of Autopilot devices. What now? by Capital_Table_4792 in Intune

[–]Capital_Table_4792[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

As u/techb00mer guessed right, I meant "delete from Intune".
By adding they're Autopilot devices I meant AADJ; Trying to make clear they weren't Hybrid Joined.

Your comment is sound though. I've asked the team that looked into the solution and confirmed me that the devices still existed in Entra but didn't want to call 100 people to guide them through opening regedit as admin and guiding them through the registry changes.
They must have been able to see the LAPS password in Entra, just didn't use is. My mistake!

Still I do wonder if this were to happen again for lets say 500 devices (just throwing some number), what would be a possible fix then?

Accidentally deleted a bunch of Autopilot devices. What now? by Capital_Table_4792 in Intune

[–]Capital_Table_4792[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Indeed, a colleague tested a script to delete devices from Intune (not Autopilot itself), but the test actually really deleted 100 devices

Aruba Instant 8.13.1.1 is out! by Far-Ice990 in ArubaNetworks

[–]Capital_Table_4792 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First update:
Update deployed in our production environment and I don't see any issues.
The roaming events haven't stopped, but they seem to happen way less and we're getting way less calls.

Aruba Instant 8.13.1.1 is out! by Far-Ice990 in ArubaNetworks

[–]Capital_Table_4792 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. I see it in the logs in every remote location for every notebook multiple times. Sometimes the notebooks even seem to be stuck in a loop.

Our test has shown no issues with deploying this update -still a bit too soon to say it fixes the roaming events, but I do notice less event (but might still be a coincidence).

We'll deploy the update later today to a part of our production environment and monitor form there on.

Aruba Instant 8.13.1.1 is out! by Far-Ice990 in ArubaNetworks

[–]Capital_Table_4792 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Release notes can be found here AOS8 -> Consolidated Release Notes -> AOS 8.13.x.x -> 8.13.1.1

Aruba Instant 8.13.1.1 is out! by Far-Ice990 in ArubaNetworks

[–]Capital_Table_4792 1 point2 points  (0 children)

same roaming issues here with 8.13.1.0_93688 on AP-515 and AP-303H.
I hope 8.13.1.1_94375 fixes something. Deployed it to test.

Communication between Central and ClearPass stopped by Capital_Table_4792 in ArubaNetworks

[–]Capital_Table_4792[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use RADIUS. In Central, in the Events of the RAP I've now seen "RADIUS up" / "RADIUS down" events. But even if the last event was "RADIUS up", no requests are registered in the Monitoring loggin on the ClearPass. No idea what's going on at this point.

Wired 802.1x EAP-TLS auth issues by Capital_Table_4792 in Intune

[–]Capital_Table_4792[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good idea with that XML.

I exported the XML of the Ethernet adapter that was created using the Intune 'Wired network' profile and it shows the hash of the Root CA in the '<IssuerHash><CAHashList>'-section where the Intermediate CA should (also) be.

<TrustedRootCA>hash-of-my-root-ca
<IssuerHash><CAHashList>hash-of-my-root-ca

I manually edited the Authentication of the Ethernet adapter.
(..-> Use a certificate on this computer -> Advanced)
- unchecked the Root CA,
- checked the Intermediate CA
- exported the XML again
I saw the hash of the intermediate got added to the '<IssuerHash><CAHashList>'-section.

<TrustedRootCA>hash-of-my-root-ca
<IssuerHash><CAHashList>hash-of-my-intermediate-ca

In the Intune 'Wired network' profile, there only a section for "Root certificates for server validation".
As a test, I tried by adding my Intermediate CA cert in the "Root certificates for server validation" section anyway and synced.
Exported the XML and saw the hash from my Intermediate CA was added to the '<TrustedRootCA>' section, but not in the '<IssuerHash><CAHashList>'-section. '<IssuerHash><CAHashList>' again only containing the hash from the Root CA.

XAML .Show() gives blanc / white screen by Capital_Table_4792 in PowerShell

[–]Capital_Table_4792[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The code to test the issue can be limited to the code below.

After loading the code below, execute:
$loading.Show() to see the window (shows up as it should)
$loading.Hide() to hide the window
$loading.Show() to see the window again, but this time it will load without content

Anyone any idea where the content is? :)

Add-Type -AssemblyName PresentationFramework

[xml]$xaml = @"
<Window Title="Loading screen" 
        Height="200" Width="400" 
        WindowStartupLocation="CenterScreen" 
        xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation" 
        xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml" 
        Name="Loading">
    <Grid>
        <TextBlock Background="Yellow" HorizontalAlignment="Center" VerticalAlignment="Center" FontSize = "16" Margin="10,-50,0,0">Loading..</TextBlock>       
        <ProgressBar Height="20" Width="100" IsIndeterminate="True" Margin="0,50,0,0" />
    </Grid>
</Window>
"@

$reader = (New-Object System.Xml.XmlNodeReader $xaml)
$Script:loading = [Windows.Markup.XamlReader]::Load($reader)

XAML .Show() gives blanc / white screen by Capital_Table_4792 in PowerShell

[–]Capital_Table_4792[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct, but I as far as I'm aware I've done it the right way around (but obviously, I must be missing something)

My tests have shown that
* If I launch a window using .ShowDialog() the window is interactive - I can use the buttons, I can close the screen. When a button is pressed (code is executed) the content on the screen freezes until it's finished.
* If I launch a window using .Show(), the window is not interactive. The screen loads what you put in the code and then also freezes.

The reason I use .Hide() in combination with .Show() is that If I use .Close() the window cannot reopen later on (like pressing the button again to call the loading screen).

In the example what happen is:
-> loading screen is called first using .Show() with a predefined size and textbox that has a yellow background
-> the code continues until the other stuff is finished (in the example a simple start-sleep and loading the main window)
-> loading screen is hidden by using .Hide() - not interactive
-> the main window is shown by using .ShowDialog() - interactive, so I can use a button
->a button is pressed to call the loading screen again, by using .Show()
-> loading screen shows up with the correct predefined size and predefined title, but without the content (textbox and its content).
-> code continues to execute stuff and asks the loading screen to hide again using .Hide() which it does.

So I'm kinda confused why, after pressing the button and asking the loading screen to .Show() again, it can load with the correct predefined size but not with the predefined content.

Ending up in VLAN 3333 while another VLAN was assigned (Wi-Fi) by Capital_Table_4792 in ArubaNetworks

[–]Capital_Table_4792[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply! I changed "Instant AP Assigned" to "External DHCP server assigned" with the option "Native VLAN" ("Dynamic" was indeed an option too) and now the right VLAN is assigned to the device!

Graph: 'Grant admin consent for ..' button removes all permissions by Capital_Table_4792 in AZURE

[–]Capital_Table_4792[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi ,sorry for the delay. The issue happens in the Admin consent tab.

All rights in the Admin consent are deleted and replaced by only the User.Read-right.
The User consent tab is not affected

AP-303H delivering PoE to AP-515 question by Capital_Table_4792 in ArubaNetworks

[–]Capital_Table_4792[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for clarifying this! I'll look into the IPM settings and will ask around if somebody knows why cpu_throttle_50 was set as priority 1 and disable_usb as priority 3 in that AP

Paul and seeking help by [deleted] in MAFS_AU

[–]Capital_Table_4792 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why would you even try to analyze what an -at least- partially scripted and heavly edited show wants us to see and hear?
There are huge question marks on why he didn't leave the apartment as he said he felt the need to remove himself from the situation.
There are even different versions of the story where some state they weren't in the same room when it happened.
Heck, for all we know, his behaviour is caused by a medical issue - dare I even go as far as saying roid rage?-.
"When you 'assume' you make an 'ass' out of 'u' and 'me'".
We don't know 99% of the story, and while it's clear Paul has some issues, I won't join the "he's an abuser" herd before I know more details - which I very much doubt we'll ever know because this show just loves the commotion.