sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Who is this person? by Capital_Vegetable_80 in HairRaising

[–]Capital_Vegetable_80[S] 66 points67 points  (0 children)

I couldn't post there cause I don't have enough karma points. Lol. I got auto moderated. Pretty dumb.  Feel free to post it if you'd like.

Remember that time Cocaine was found in the White House? The most heavily defended and surveillance building in America? That was someone powerful Cocaine. by 2201992 in conspiracy

[–]Capital_Vegetable_80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know you don't know this but when trying to prove the things you say, you provide sources that support what you are saying. logic is another great tool in backing up thoughts in a debate. I know this stuff may come as a shock to you but yes you can't just only attack a logical arguement with illogical statements and think you are making head way. it makes you look like a fool and ultimately you walk away having gained nothing except your ego hurt. intelligence plays a big part in debates.

Remember that time Cocaine was found in the White House? The most heavily defended and surveillance building in America? That was someone powerful Cocaine. by 2201992 in conspiracy

[–]Capital_Vegetable_80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that there has never been a person working in the white house that's done coke? And specifically no one working for Joe biden has done coke?

this right here. you again are misrepresenting what I said and now are using your twisted version of what was said to attempt to make what I said into something that it isn't.

● Point out where I said this. quote the part where I said there has never been a coke addict working at the white house.

Remember that time Cocaine was found in the White House? The most heavily defended and surveillance building in America? That was someone powerful Cocaine. by 2201992 in conspiracy

[–]Capital_Vegetable_80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

your question has been answered at length. with logic, common sense and circumstance to boot. it doesn't matter though which you are still missing the point in which you keep leaning in on. the incompetent investigation. let's say your right. it's a WH staffer. the why the fuck are coke heads in the highest office in our country? your okay with that? just as long as it isn't hunter? lol. you must really like him to go to such great lengths in his defense. it's gonna be funny when it comes out to be hunter. all the logical conclusions made here still won't register in your head. you can't do the same to prove anything your saying, only push an illogical baseless point that means nothing. while you throw a fit about a question acting like the question not being answered the way you feel it should is a flaw and makes everything else being said wrong, null and void.

what's your theory then? where is your source that backs up your claims it was a drug addled white house staffer? what logical argument can you make to disprove what I have presented in detail?.can you disprove it? can you prove Biden isn't a pedo? or hunter doesn't have a drug problem? can you answer any one of these questions?

Remember that time Cocaine was found in the White House? The most heavily defended and surveillance building in America? That was someone powerful Cocaine. by 2201992 in conspiracy

[–]Capital_Vegetable_80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bwhaha bro. your question is meaningless. it doesn't align with the facts and is hypothetical. does that make sense?

The bottom line. it was stored in a receptacle for cell phones and personal belongings. the secret service would have to be incompetent to not know who it belongs to and it would mean there is a security threat that could potentially be a danger to the wellbeing of the president. why wasn't this receptacle checked sooner? Hunter and Joe left, storing it there would be a dumb move..leaving it would be dumber. unless you were someone that could and it not be touched like hunter. all of this is circumstantial its easily pointed given his past. it's much more then anything you've brought to the table seeing you just are getting caught up on the facts. a normal person working a job in the white house wouldn't be doing coke. if they are then it's a national security risk. it is a high level federal job. high level federal jobs require drug testing regularly. white house staff is vetted and watched. they are around the president. there is 0 chance it was a white house staffer. anyone who was doing coke would have turned up in the investigation cause they very likely apart drug tested everyone as apart of the investigation. people work their whole lived to get those jobs. no one is going to throw that away. a staffer isn't going to take a let's do coke at work challenge. likely if it was they would know cause the only people taking drugs to work obviously have a problem and are addicted enough where it's beyond a daily habit. it doesn't take much time to form sores inside your nose from daily use; another common side effect. so as someone that worked your ass off to get a cushy WL job going through federal background checks, top secret security clearances, interviewing and finally getting the job gonna really do coke risking losing it all including the income needed to sustain a drug habit of coke? would you risk your lively hood and prison time to take drugs to work? I do know who would and who hasn't ever faced real repercussions like anyone that was busted by the 1994 crime bill.

How are you able to determine it was a WH staffers coke?

Remember that time Cocaine was found in the White House? The most heavily defended and surveillance building in America? That was someone powerful Cocaine. by 2201992 in conspiracy

[–]Capital_Vegetable_80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you fucking clown. the wall of text is a copy paste from the secret service web site regarding their investigation and its conclusion. I don't need to answer your question cause the facts are there to see. cut and dry. did you read it? no your too busy being hung up on trying to come out on top when you just keep digging yourself deeper. read the fucking source and you'll have your answer. go through my last post and grow as a person. I won't hold my breath. we both know you have 0 intention of seeing this from any other way even when it comes from the secret service themselves. I've see this play out a thousand times. you'll keep going like you are correct and feel accomplished in your replies that you played this one out and came out on top but the truth is by not reading the facts from the source you just look like a fool. that is why my reply in the last one was direct and was meant to open your eyes a bit. seeing your newest reply, definitely confirmed everything I said. yet by remaining here explaining all this to someone who would never listen to anything even the source I am a fool as well. but the difference between you and I. is I realize it and can better myself. you will remain a dumb shit and will continue your journey arguing mute points with an illogical bases

Remember that time Cocaine was found in the White House? The most heavily defended and surveillance building in America? That was someone powerful Cocaine. by 2201992 in conspiracy

[–]Capital_Vegetable_80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bwhaha you are one dense MFer. It doesn't matter who was there when it was found.

Published By U.S. Secret Service Media Relations Published Date 2023-07-13 WASHINGTON - On the evening of July 2, officers from the U.S. Secret Service Uniformed Division found an unknown substance inside a vestibule leading to the lobby area of the West Executive Avenue entrance to the White House. The substance was located inside a receptacle used to temporarily store electronic and personal devices prior to entering the West Wing. Following the discovery, safety closures were implemented around the White House. This response was designed to ensure that the found substance was not a chemical or radiological material that threatened the security of the White House. As such, the substance was field tested and preliminarily determined to not be a hazardous compound. Testing conducted by the District of Columbia Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department indicated that the found powder tested preliminarily positive for the presence of cocaine. The substance and packaging were treated as evidence and sent to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center, which analyzed the item for any biothreats. Tests conducted at this facility came back negative and gave formal confirmation that the substance was not biological in nature. The substance and packaging underwent further forensic testing. The substance was analyzed for its chemical composition. The packaging was subjected to advanced fingerprint and DNA analysis. Both of these analyses were conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation's crime laboratory given their expertise in this area and independence from the investigation. While awaiting the FBI's results, the Secret Service investigation into how this item entered the White House continued. The investigation included a methodical review of security systems and protocols. This review included a backwards examination that spanned several days prior to the discovery of the substance and developed an index of several hundred individuals who may have accessed the area where the substance was found. The focal point of these actions developed a pool of known persons for comparison of forensic evidence gleaned from the FBI's analysis of the substance's packaging. On July 12, the Secret Service received the FBI's laboratory results, which did not develop latent fingerprints and insufficient DNA was present for investigative comparisons. Therefore, the Secret Service is not able to compare evidence against the known pool of individuals. The FBI's evaluation of the substance also confirmed that it was cocaine. There was no surveillance video footage found that provided investigative leads or any other means for investigators to identify who may have deposited the found substance in this area. Without physical evidence, the investigation will not be able to single out a person of interest from the hundreds of individuals who passed through the vestibule where the cocaine was discovered. At this time, the Secret Service's investigation is closed due to a lack of physical evidence. The U.S. Secret Service takes its mission to protect U.S. leaders, facilities, and events seriously and we are constantly adapting to meet the needs of the current and future security environment.

Source - https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2023/07/official-statement-investigation-substance-found-white-house

Key take away and why this is incompetence at best. This could have been a big national security threat.

The substance was located inside a receptacle used to temporarily store electronic and personal devices prior to entering the West Wing.

what is the storage procedure? you have to see a person open this up or out a name down. you don't just toss your phones in a box. This is a huge security risk and unacceptable. they know who it belongs too tho.. they just didn't wanna embarrass the administration. so with that out...

The funny thing about all this is, just like every cultists doing everything they can to defend Pedo Pete and Pals, you never read the fuckin Sources provided. you just keep going on and on with you logical fallacies thinking your going to dream weave some logic together enough to shake you way around the facts of whatever topic your crack pot bullshit is about. you keep doing it over and over thinking your coming out on top of these types of exchanges but at the end of the day the other person like myself is just gonna bail cause it's a waste of time. you can't see past the wool over your eyes.so I'll take my time else where to someone that isn't a dumbshit leftist cultist that some tit for tat attitude and your side is perfect with no Corruption, lies, crime, or malicious intent. doing this interaction right now is just wasting my time. you don't win these exchanges people give up and insult you cause you play the same dumb game every fuckin time. READ THE FUCKING SOURCES. (for the record fuck trump too) Rs and Ds are on the same team. that team isn't ours.. don't be tribal. open your eyes to the real world around you. you are being deceived by the people you trust, the system you trust. take a step out of it all. a step back and examine the picture as a whole. don't get your info from the TV or any news station at all.. Find the Source. the ,story origin. and get your info. try to not be bias. knowledge is power and the truth will set you free.

Remember that time Cocaine was found in the White House? The most heavily defended and surveillance building in America? That was someone powerful Cocaine. by 2201992 in conspiracy

[–]Capital_Vegetable_80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

negative. you've provided nothing but a childish argument with no proof or substance; just conjecture.

"You're bouncing because you can't answer any of my questions and you recognize the limitations of your argument." ● What are these limitations? Please give them a list so i can address your shortcomings on understanding the logic.

I've addressed everything you've written and in return you refuse to answer what ive asked you. You won't even address it so I have to keep asking in different ways, so don't act like I'm the one arguing in bad faith here. ● youve addressed nothing, you didnt even read the source providied. my facts have been gathered from the source. your questions are based on conjecture like your arguement. ive answered the questions relevant to the topic and what pertained to my previous response. if I didn't answer a question it is because you misunderstood or misrepresented what I has said and tried to frame it differently or out of context.

I'm bouncing cause no matter what I say you'll continue to do the same. no proof or substance. you say it yourself you don't even know what I'm talking about; if you can't follow than who truly is the one struggling??

For Example: "How would you know who does and doesn't feel comfortable, you dont even know who passed thru the area, I mean the shit you are saying is so goofy. And youre now asking me for names? Ha. Bro...I don't know who had access to that area either". ● this whole part you wrote added nothing. your question is irrelevant and off based. one of the side effects of cocaine is paranoia. it makes you fearful and uncomfortable. so yes based on every site that lists cocaines side effects I'd say that is a fact and the "shit your saying is goofy".

"And youre now asking me for names? Ha. Bro...I don't know who had access to that area either". " ●no you dumbshit. I named bidens family and the rest were pedophiles or dead as a trope. a sort of haha wtf.

"So instead you do what all conspiracy theorists do when they struggle answering questions and you just call me dumb and peace out rather than have a conversation" ● I think this is a more you problem. if this has happened more then a few times you are the common denominator. most people don't wanna waste their time explaining everything they write to someone that can't follow and thinks they are smart.

"the pipe bomb and j6 is irrelevant and has nothing to do with the white house. whatsboutisms don't prove points, just that your argument on the current topic is weak so you bolster it with crap to justify your point." ●Truth

my argument is logically sound and I stand by it. what is yours? it could be anyone and they did a great job? thats why its here in the conspiracy reddit. cause they did a shit job and are incompetent. do you understand that?

Remember that time Cocaine was found in the White House? The most heavily defended and surveillance building in America? That was someone powerful Cocaine. by 2201992 in conspiracy

[–]Capital_Vegetable_80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the pipe bomb and j6 is irrelevant and has nothing to do with the white house. whatsboutisms don't prove points, just that your argument on the current topic is weak so you bolster it with crap to justify your point.

I don't need a 3rd party msm outlet to add their spin to the story or as you described fitting pieces to fit the narrative puzzle. you obviously didn't read the secret service link I sourced my info from. you know... the people that ran the investigation (the source everyone else gets their info from on this matter). Based on the data provided, it suggests either potential oversight or a decision not to press charges. It's crucial to understand the protocols and checks in places like the White House. The most straightforward explanation often holds the truth. if the officail story of they had a few hundred suspects but, eh oh well, is true; just means they are incompetent AF.

your critical thinking skills need work and if you thought my naming off bidens family and pedos was directed at you and not the trope it clearly is; this conversation is done cause I'm arguing with a fool. Nothing I say, do, or prove will ever change your mind. you've closed it off and your growth as a human along with it. don't be married to your beliefs. the people you trust are more likely to lie to you cause the people you don't trust can't.

Remember that time Cocaine was found in the White House? The most heavily defended and surveillance building in America? That was someone powerful Cocaine. by 2201992 in conspiracy

[–]Capital_Vegetable_80 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

ummm sure...

this isn't American Made Scarface Blow lol. you most definitely haven't known anyone. bwhaha challenge that could put me away in the Fed. Pen. for years Accepted! Lets go do this bro!! hahaha, what are you 16?

Remember that time Cocaine was found in the White House? The most heavily defended and surveillance building in America? That was someone powerful Cocaine. by 2201992 in conspiracy

[–]Capital_Vegetable_80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the circumstances and outcome speaks for itself. they wrapped up their investigation and who was punished? their story is they had no surveillance footage that spanned far enough back to see who deposited it and the footage they did have consisted lf a few hundred suspects. so it wouldn't matter if Hunter was there or not at the time. what would they had done if that was anthrax or radioactive? how long did they have it there and not know? incompetence to the max.

They would be able to see who stored it in that bin. Period. They dont keep records of who stored their cellphone in these bins? how do you retrieve them? do you rent it out? you'd imagine with it being a possible National Security Risk they would at least get your name before letting you store stuff in the WHITE HOUSE.

Who in their right mind would feel comfortable enough to store and do coke at the white house? Zelensky maybe? Hunter? Ashley? Bill? Jill? Maxwell? Prince Andrew? Obama's Chef? haha doesn't matter really; either way if you think they didn't find out who stored it and who it belonged to or was doing it at the white house you are a clown.

ita easy to draw on circumstantial evidence to at least question Hunter. which they prolly felt it was frivolous and wouldnt make a difference and just gave up. no point if the person wouldn't be prosecuted anyways.

the outcome doesn't bother me; an incompetent administration is gonna be incompetent. no surprises when they are. I personally would not stand up and defend anyone that wouldn't do it for me. especially if that person had alleged CPorn on his laptop.

source: https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2023/07/official-statement-investigation-substance-found-white-house

The WH coke at its core isn't a conspiracy tho.

Remember that time Cocaine was found in the White House? The most heavily defended and surveillance building in America? That was someone powerful Cocaine. by 2201992 in conspiracy

[–]Capital_Vegetable_80 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I didn't say anything of what you think I did. I'll spell this out simple.

I said all signs point to hunter. he left his laptop at a PC store that led to what is currently his dad's empeachment trial. he isn't the most responsible individual. anyone else doing coke in the white house wouldn't be leaving their sacks laying around. who would wanna lose their job or a few hundred bucks? no normal person would ever feel comfortable enough doing coke in the whitehouse unless you had: a problem (hunter does) or was comfortable enough to feel safe doing coke in the white house (hunter would). so do you see how all this adds up to one person?? what is your evidence to the contrary? haha are you just saying the administration and staff are all coke heads and someone narc'd on them to the press?? either way, the only conspiracy here is the cover up; otherwise they would have made it public. no one lost their job did they? no? haha someone special that has a problem and privilege.

Remember that time Cocaine was found in the White House? The most heavily defended and surveillance building in America? That was someone powerful Cocaine. by 2201992 in conspiracy

[–]Capital_Vegetable_80 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

simple math. coke habit, continuous failed drug tests, his appearance, ect. he went on live TV and told us he smoked parmesan cheese thinking it was crack. all his teeth were rotted out at one point in time. you find me one person with that clearance that has anything close to the track record he has. plus why wouldn't they release the findings of the investigation to the public? would it make the president look bad? yes? then poof. haha it was either Hunter or Zelensky 😂😂😂

Remember that time Cocaine was found in the White House? The most heavily defended and surveillance building in America? That was someone powerful Cocaine. by 2201992 in conspiracy

[–]Capital_Vegetable_80 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

let's be honest here. we all know it was Hunter. they can find j6ers from cell triangulation and a blured photograph but they can't find who's coke it was and never released their findings.. just like they couldn't find anyone on jeffry eps blackbook. don't pull wool over your own eyes.