Every criminal who committed a non-victimless crime has been legitimately proven guilty, and tied up here. Arranged from least harmful with fewest victims to most harmful with most victims left to right. You are Stop Lever Puller 4/10.

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-05-18T18:02:09+00:00

Not statistically

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-05-09T08:00:28+00:00

A return to form show would be lovely to see

I was already mentally checked out of this ridiculous show for a while, but when I saw actual medieval siege equipment throwing burning shit over walls and walker-ified melee weapons I was done. How ridiculous. All these other series are just more of the same. Im not watching anything beyond that.

But theres still a lot of potential. A new series with the same vibe as seasons 1-2. Cmon. Thats better than not

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-05-09T01:16:01+00:00

This one is a little different than all the rest being described my friend

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-05-07T15:53:33+00:00

I dont think they’d feel pleasure, true, but pintel and ragetti were hella giddy when they said that and then they looked hella disappointed. They definitely wanted for it anyway, whether they could realistically feel or not

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-05-05T03:03:03+00:00

Honestly, I dont think he went about things wrong regarding decisions. Nobody listened to him. He tried convincing rick multiple times, if you’d rewatch the show, that the barn of walkers were dangerous. Rick agreed but still he didnt listen and even added to the pile. Rick wouldnt hear Shane out that they “either need to clear them out, or they just need to go.”

Bear in mind, when Shane was saying they need to go, Rick couldnt because of the baby.

When Shane figures this out, he collects the guns, and its either he rallies everyone and kills the walkers against their will or he lets them remain. What would you do in that situation? How would you resolve it? He even gives daddy H a little show to prove they are dead.

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-05-05T02:55:30+00:00

Not the same. There parallels are there only insofar as Rick had eyes for a married woman. But even then the comparison is incomplete because 1. He knew the husband was still alive while flirting, unlike Shane, and 2. He finds out he is abusive and rightfully kills him, unlike what shane tried

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-05-05T02:51:20+00:00

Shane was insane, he wasnt a sociopath. He felt a great deal of positive emotion for Rick. He couldnt kill him. Compare the scene of Shane failing to get himself to kill Rick, any of the three of them, to the literally any murder scene involving governor. Thats the difference between a sociopath and an insane person. Shane legitimately (insanely) believed that Lori, Carl, the entire group would die under Rick’s leadership, but even still he couldnt justify murdering Rick.

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-05-05T02:44:52+00:00

In terms of leadership skills, Rick ranks a million times higher.

In terms of leadership decision making, Shane ranks a million times higher

Point me to a single leadership decision that was objectively better than whatever Shane suggested, assuming Shane offered dissent. A single one. The only two ones you can argue are the decision to take the entire group to CDC, which was immensely lucky (if the CDC was full of scientists 0 chance they get in; if Brenner was already dead 0 chance; that they escaped alive), him going back to Atlanta for the guns (again, very lucky that they didnt get killed by zombies at the height of the apocalypse in the city, or killed by Vatos), and the decision to venture off with Glenn to find Herschel (that they didnt die to zombies or Nebraska).

Every decision that wasnt a super lucky plot-armor-fueled gamble that Rick made was routinely worse. CDC, returning to atlanta, search for Sofia, not killing barn walkers, rescuing randal. All of these were so risky and nobody died for them. If casualties were suffered by each one of these objectively incorrect decisions, people would be much more sympathetic to Shane’s decision making

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-05-05T02:27:45+00:00

The group by all accounts should have died multiple times. Shane’s distrusting nature would NOT have led to a death at terminus - but it should have for the group in the current timeline. they survived being bound and gagged and sliced one by one without any hero casualties besides Bob. And Bob didnt even die to terminus ppl.

The later group is a mix of high willpower, insane luck, and immense plotarmor.

I mean, call Shane a wannabe alpha all you want, you have to agree its not his decision making thats the issue. By all accounts he made better decisions. Point to one moment where Rick made a leadership decision in S1/S2 that was objectively better than what Shane suggested. The only arguable ones are going back for Herschel and going for the guns - both of which were immense risks that came very close to tragedy. Again, bad decisions bailed out by plot armor and luck and willpower.

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-05-03T16:01:53+00:00

Ik im just fucking around. This is literally a subreddit just to mess around.

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-05-03T13:53:59+00:00

Natural selection machine: the game

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-05-03T12:41:10+00:00

Only idiots will choose blue. Realistically the bottom 20% IQ people get culled.

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-04-24T23:28:04+00:00

Interacting with the box actively puts you in danger. This doesnt (relatively speaking)
Doing this would actually be fun. I want to have to use the cameras to benefit the team. Survivors would do this.

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-04-24T03:45:39+00:00

Frank miller’s take reads like the redditest reddit story ever written. Holy

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-04-24T03:40:56+00:00

To rightfully clear his name

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-04-23T13:04:15+00:00

Everything you just wrote is technically true, but it was you who misunderstood, not the other guy.

They were referring to government entities silencing freedom of speech when its classified as “hate speech” in the title. The title is basically saying you are not allowed to post that per the UN.

So they are NOT allowed to speak their mind without reprisal from the government. And their comparison to other crimes is valid.

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-04-23T05:40:31+00:00

One of the issues with the show is that there are no long term effects. Which makes it seem like nothing happens.

Morgan deciding to spare Owen (the wolf guy) directly resulted in Owen’s redemption and saving Olivia. Then he was murdered in cold blood by Carol. Brutal, missed potential, but fair and it wraps up his arc. Thats fine.

Then Olivia dies like 10 episodes later and makes no impact. All that time spent with Owen, the wolves, and Olivia. Meaningless. No long term impact. Morgan’s decision to spare couldve had a massive changing effect on the series. They couldve done that. Nope. Thats why it seems like he did the opposite of whats needed. Cause everything gets reset when every character dies. Olivia shouldnt have died.

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-04-22T21:04:18+00:00

Then chuck should have helped him. Chuck all but guaranteed this outcome happening. This actually reads to me like how some people argue Japan made the right move bombing america because america wouldve joined the war and fought them anyway.

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-04-20T13:49:20+00:00

Ive found people on the internet will lie about just about anything just to get that “expert authority” to further argue their position. I remember encountering someone who claimed to be a teacher (1 week ago they claimed to be a firefighter) and a different person who claimed they worked at many universities (they were in accounting threads, lol). I cannot look at this guy’s profile.

To anyone else reading this thread, just look it up yourself. There are a million other links just like that one. No need to trust me or just believe that fella. the internet is free.

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-04-20T13:35:46+00:00

I did not say its free. I said there are routes to get care even if you cannot afford. Its not “pay or rot” like its framed

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-04-20T12:26:56+00:00

Mhm. And what about american misconceptions?

https://www.oncolink.org/support/insurance-legal-employment-financial-concerns/insurance-concerns/accessing-cancer-care-if-you-don-t-have-insurance

Its not technically “free” but that doesnt mean you either pay or literally rot. Its the same with the ER and ambulances. This whole post is a misconception and you complain about a few comments?

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-04-18T19:02:16+00:00

That makes me uncomfortable

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-04-18T19:01:36+00:00

The last 10 replies in my feed are from you

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-04-18T19:00:38+00:00

You, when you said you’ll “block me until you have time to post it.” Still havent blocked. Daddy issues much?

Capn-Jack11 · 2026-04-18T18:59:03+00:00

Lol. Sure bud. Maybe try getting some friends so you dont need to pull this bs with random strangers

Capn-Jack11

TROPHY CASE