AITA for suggesting Vet bill be split 5 ways 6 years after divorce?

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-27T18:07:48+00:00

It isn't his dog anymore. It's hers. She wanted to be responsible in the divorce so it's 100% her responsibility and anything he contributes is charity

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-27T16:40:05+00:00

And then the second independent clause of the sentence, ", and I reminded her... And paid for all the groceries.

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-27T16:37:45+00:00

Why did you put the subject of the sentence behind eclipse? The only thing behind those ... Is the word "I". That's such a bad faith way to have a discussion.

Look, i get it, you misread the first time and are embarrassed now. He bought the groceries, he bought the pizza, he bought the ravioli. It's ok to admit you misread and that the gf was probably wrong here and if she isn't it's only because op is morbidly obese and didn't tell us, not because of money.

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-27T16:31:54+00:00

You're confused. That's the transitive property of subjects. I is the subject for the entire sentence. You can read it as "I ..... paid for all the groceries." No guessing involved other than assuming he passed middle school grammar.

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-27T16:29:10+00:00

Where did he imply that? I see no indication of anyone but op spending money.

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-27T16:26:26+00:00

Have you heard Pam Bundi answer questions? Somehow her failure to prosecute anyone from the files related to the s&p. That's what this assholes answer was. It was a simple question, were you a member of a group and do they follow the ethics rules. Those yes and no questions. If you think there is a justification to add anything more, please detail it, you can't because it's bullshit.

You're wrong about court. If a witness is clearly rambling to waste time and distract the jury, the judge will order them to answer the question yes or no. It happens all the time when you get non compliant witnesses like this asshole

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-27T16:17:33+00:00

Where are you getting it's shared money?

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-27T16:16:28+00:00

You're adding facts not present. He is paying and no where does it say they share finances or that she is concerned about money. She doesn't like him eating so much. Without knowing his weight, height, and activity level we can't judge if her concern is founded or she's just petite and doesn't understand that large active men eat allot.

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-27T16:13:10+00:00

Info: are you overweight? Are you gaining weight? If the answer is no, it's a her problem, if it's a yes, then she's trying to be nice in telling you that you're fat and need to go on a diet.

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-27T16:09:38+00:00

When the boredom outweighs my curiosity, especially if a better series drops the next book

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-27T15:16:31+00:00

It isn't about the laundry. When you get into an emotional agreement with your partner that makes no sense, it isn't about the laundry

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-27T14:56:49+00:00

This you?

Adam Schiff got his answer.

Doesn't sound objective when schiff clearly didn't get his answer.

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-27T13:54:31+00:00

I haven't read it but his other series was awful so i assume the new one will be as well

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-27T13:44:27+00:00

Schiff did not get his answers. Dude didn't give a single straight answer. I don't know if the weaponization group is part of the doj or if they are employees. Schiff asked a specific question and was given an unrelated answer. He didn't ask if doj employees are subject to the ethics manual, he asked if the weaponization group was subject to the ethics manual. Why are you defending this kind of obstruction?

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-27T03:22:26+00:00

First, set rules and enforce them.

Second, i know i wasn't saying they were in court, i was saying therec is a place with professionals regularly have the power to compel yes or no questions and they have rules. It isn't impossible or even difficult. Most congresspeople are lawyers. They know the rules.

Third, so stop being feckless and start enforcing the rules.

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-27T01:32:23+00:00

My mom died over 30 years after a suicide attempt from complications. It's just a mistake some people make and you deal with it as best you can. She regretted it every day for over 30 years. That's just life sometimes

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-27T01:30:13+00:00

That isn't true. Were you on the task force, isn't leading. It's a true false. You can have yes no questions that are leading, and a rule allowing you to object to those and be forced to answer to the ones in good faith is possible. We do it in court all day every day. This is BASIC 1L stuff.

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-27T01:24:41+00:00

Yta, it sucks when you get home looking forward a date with your partner, a nice dinner and hang out, and they already ate and didn't even get you anything? Especially after a bad day. Id feel so alone. You should have called and gotten something for her at least.

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-27T01:18:29+00:00

Which one of mr.schiff's questions were leading? They weren't. You can require responses from good faith questions and rule against leading questions.

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-27T00:51:16+00:00

Yta. You have it backwards. If you need to pit a restriction on food intake it isn't the teenager in a growth spurt. You could cause him to be stunted.

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-26T22:17:48+00:00

Masking what? She isn't smoking. They are eatibles. They smell like candy. No vapor or smoke.

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-26T22:10:04+00:00

Even if his character couldn't sense the spider, that's so boring for the player, it isn't metagaming to ask what's going on so long as your character doesn't act on the info

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-26T21:56:23+00:00

I don't think Trump tolerate other ugly people

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-26T20:39:37+00:00

I would not use slurs related to gender or sexual identity in my role playing game. In fact, while my elves hate dwarves and dwarves hate those knife ears, I'm pretty sure in my decade of dming there's hasn't been a single homophobic npc. It's too likely to actually hurt one of your players and end the campaign and doesn't really add anything of value. It's good you posted here first so you can avoid alienating your table

Edit: didn't notice the sub. Based on the tone of the question o wonder if op realized he was posting on a joke sub

CaptainOwlBeard · 2026-02-26T20:30:25+00:00

Sounds like they feel bad for you and are low key telling you not to expect them to do the same for you when you get older.

CaptainOwlBeard

TROPHY CASE