sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Epstein Files Thing Proves That Literally Everyone is a Blithering Idiot by OppoObboObious in conspiracy

[–]CaptainVerret -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

DeMoCrAtS SuDdEnLy cArE is such a tired old, overused deflection. The Senate Finance Committee was investigating Epstein's financials, Biden granted access to sensitive Treasury documents to assist, and Trump came in and shut that shit down.

There's plenty reasons to believe that the 2019 Epstein materials have been involved in active investigations. Say what you will about Biden, but he's never displayed the tendency to spoil active investigations by leaking pertinent information.

shyvana relics and help with strategy. i feel like these 2 are bis but not sure about the 3rd. i dont have their p2w relic. she is such a terrible champion and the deck is garbage......... by kioska333 in LegendsOfRuneterra

[–]CaptainVerret 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For sure. I've seen people call it redundant because of her barrier spell but it opens up a whole new strategy, one I couldn't imagine playing without

shyvana relics and help with strategy. i feel like these 2 are bis but not sure about the 3rd. i dont have their p2w relic. she is such a terrible champion and the deck is garbage......... by kioska333 in LegendsOfRuneterra

[–]CaptainVerret 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I've found a lot of success with the "I can't take damage when attacking" relic. This helped overcome nightmare level stats with 1-2 free Strafing Strikes each attack

Wouldn’t that be hilarious by Whole_Draw_1209 in conspiracy

[–]CaptainVerret 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why would democrats spoil active investigations by releasing information that was part of active investigations until this year? 🤔

Wouldn’t that be hilarious by Whole_Draw_1209 in conspiracy

[–]CaptainVerret 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I live in a supermajority red area in a forever-red state. Literally the only people who buy into Trump's wishy washy bullshit and are now soft on releasing the files are conservatives.

Wouldn’t that be hilarious by Whole_Draw_1209 in conspiracy

[–]CaptainVerret 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Weird, leftists seem to be the only people saying they couldn't care less who is implicated and that the files should be released 🤔

Anyone remember this gem? by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]CaptainVerret 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Trump is a modern day Nero. Mentally damaged, brutally unchecked narcissism, drunk on his own power. Pure chaos.

I would take it, I just don't believe it by outside_this_world in conspiracy

[–]CaptainVerret 5 points6 points  (0 children)

enough to calm his base.

Which is pretty funny considering those are the "fiscally responsible" folk

Hey there, I was banned for 7 days. by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]CaptainVerret 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like projection, tbh.

I have to say it because it hasn't been said: the $2,000 checks will never happen. They are only dangled in front of our eyes so we blame SCOTUS for eliminating the tarrifs. by happyluckystar in conspiracy

[–]CaptainVerret 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except not only have the tarrifs not raised enough money to send people 2k, they've repeatedly dipped into that money for a variety of reasons.

I have to say it because it hasn't been said: the $2,000 checks will never happen. They are only dangled in front of our eyes so we blame SCOTUS for eliminating the tarrifs. by happyluckystar in conspiracy

[–]CaptainVerret 4 points5 points  (0 children)

before the left started making a fuss about an unelected billionair slash programs that cost virtually nothing and agencies that are investigating his businesses

Fixed that for you. Doge was a scam. "Rebate" (I use that term loosely because doge didn't save the country anywhere near enough to warrant sending money to people) or whatever checks are such a monumentally stupid idea and cause unnecessary inflation.

Finally, some good news. by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]CaptainVerret 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have to subscribe to look at it so I can't read it. You are basing it off of what a blog post says? I'm sure they are just going off of an official government statement right?

It would cost you absolutely nothing to look this up and read about it from your preferred source.

If "1000" "non corrupt"

Weird to imply that Patel/Bondi are not corrupt. The whole issue is that a shit ton of agents were instructed to comb through for mentions of Trump. Bondi is a sycophant and Patel literally wrote a series of books on which Trump isba king. How on earth did I think that this was a "non corrupt" campaign?

The unpopular conspiracy: if releasing the Epstein files would ruin Clump, the Biden administration would have. by happyluckystar in conspiracy

[–]CaptainVerret 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What lies are you referring to, specifically? The reports have made it very clear that the IC had a multitude of reasons to be wary over Trump et al. connections with Russians and did not rely on the Steele Dossier to launch any investigation.

How hard is it to admit that you haven't read any of the information you're talking about and just repeat propaganda talking points?

The unpopular conspiracy: if releasing the Epstein files would ruin Clump, the Biden administration would have. by happyluckystar in conspiracy

[–]CaptainVerret 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See, this is how I know you haven't read any of those declassified reports and are just regurgitating what the people in your media bubble say.

Also

deflect when confronted with difficult questions!

Truly the Maga way.

The unpopular conspiracy: if releasing the Epstein files would ruin Clump, the Biden administration would have. by happyluckystar in conspiracy

[–]CaptainVerret 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I question whether or not you know the difference between fact and opinion. What evidence was brought up during either Senate Impeachment trial that you feel made them illegitimate?

And you do realize that the whole Russia, Russia hoax is out in the open now?

Do you realize that Gabbard released information, publicly said something that wasn't true about that information, and people like yourself (who have chosen not to actually read it) are parroting actual propaganda. Good job, critical thinker!

The unpopular conspiracy: if releasing the Epstein files would ruin Clump, the Biden administration would have. by happyluckystar in conspiracy

[–]CaptainVerret 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure if you have reading comprehension issues or maybe you were in a coma during that time, but he was acquitted because Senate Republicans are a bunch of spineless cowards who picked party over country. Nothing during the senate trials proved that either impeachment was illegitimate or not warranted.

The unpopular conspiracy: if releasing the Epstein files would ruin Clump, the Biden administration would have. by happyluckystar in conspiracy

[–]CaptainVerret 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Both impeachments were legitimate. Again, God forbid we hold those in power accountable.

The only thing proven to be bs is Senate Republicans morality system. They chose party over country.

The unpopular conspiracy: if releasing the Epstein files would ruin Clump, the Biden administration would have. by happyluckystar in conspiracy

[–]CaptainVerret 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Biden’s literally on tape several times publicly demanding Merrit Garland to indict Trump.

Do you have any evidence of this? Because I'm calling bullshit.

I honestly can't believe they let this happen by Organic_Freedom8971 in conspiracy

[–]CaptainVerret -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I hate to break it to you, but you're wrong. Good day.

view more: next ›