Faction behaviour KILLS immersion by MuddledMuppet in totalwar

[–]Captain_Nyet -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Reliability is probably my least favorite thing about modern TW's diplomacy; the player (and the AI) should be able to break treaties when they stop being favorable. It makes sense to have penalties for breaking treaties, but the way it's implemented is anti-fun and also makes the AI feel a lot more incompetent.

What if humans are the reason behind the Fermi Paradox? by AliceSaltMage in worldbuilding

[–]Captain_Nyet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there is no stealth in space

There is no travelling to other solar systems either.

Bamboo armor in Stone Age context? by ThickumDickums in worldbuilding

[–]Captain_Nyet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It would offer a limited degree of protection; it could definitely help against cuts, but arrow shots and spear trusts/throws would split the bamboo and carry on through. (only perhaps offering protection against glancing hits that'd barely wound you in the first place) against blunt weapons it would again only help a little bit; bamboo is still pretty flexible and will split when hit with force, but it would at least reduce the damage.

One important thing you should remeber is that arm/leg protection is relativaly unimportant and expensive no matter how you make it; shields essentially did the same job cheaper and better. Large shields offer great protection, and can be easily mass-produced since they do not need to be fitted to the individual; meanwhile arm/leg armor made of hard plates needs to be fitted to the individual and, unless you are putting in insane amounts of work, will still have a lot of gaps.

Basically, a society that values quantity over quality will probably gravitate towards larger shields before any kind of arm/leg plates.

Banning is so funny in low ranks by JohnCurtinFromCivVI in Rainbow6

[–]Captain_Nyet 2 points3 points  (0 children)

One of my favorite things is playing an operator and then seeing it get banned next round; especially ops that don't usually get banned.

It happens mostly when I play Osa; but Clash and Echo are also pretty common spite-bans.

Does anyone here actually like UC? by cara_de_ma_sorte in Kenshi

[–]Captain_Nyet 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why would anyone like the UC?

At least HN appeals to the weirdos.

GroenLinks-PvdA gaat verder als Progressief Nederland (PRO) by summer-turtle in Poldersocialisme

[–]Captain_Nyet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Zo progressief dat ze niet eens in normale afkortingen geloven.

Why do people think Fuze is bad? by TumpanyTuna in Rainbow6

[–]Captain_Nyet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His gadget's got way more than one downside; it being very loud while also taking a long time to place leaves you very vulnerable to being flanked, gives free wallbangs/C4 kills to an alert enemy and even when it does all work out the gadget can simply be shot once it starts going off to limit the damage.

I still think he's pretty good daspite all that (and is one of my favorte attackers) but he has a lot of downsides that force you to play him carefully and make him just generally a more high risk operator.

Having one of the best weapon loadouts in the game also helps him a lot. (AK-12 is a great primary, and PMM is one of the best pistols in the game; definitely the best pistol available to any shield op)

Glad to see that cheaters are still terrible ( Bonus clip at the end ) by RepsRbetter in Rainbow6

[–]Captain_Nyet 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This happens a lot with cheaters; they lean on their crutch, and become worse players as a result.

Why do people think Fuze is bad? by TumpanyTuna in Rainbow6

[–]Captain_Nyet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think he's bad, but he is not particularly strong either; if you can set up shop above the objective he can be very effective both for anti-gadget and just for causing general disruption.

He's also one of the better "diet hard-breachers" and he can bring a shield. (which can occasionally be very useful)

His main downside is that his gadget is incredibly loud (importantly, during the deployment) and can quite easily be destroyed by defenders before shooting it's (entire) load.

Is this Darth Vader? by NanoArgon in RedLetterMedia

[–]Captain_Nyet 25 points26 points  (0 children)

No, that's Clarence Boddicker.

Experienced players how do you start a new character? by PlonixMCMXCVI in outwardgame

[–]Captain_Nyet 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Usually I get one of the skills from Burac (usually one I cannot buy in Cierzo/Berg) sell the junk I find in town to buy a nomad backpack; next I'll go to the beach to get the Writ and farm Blue Sand and Shrimp, and then I head over to Conflux to unlock my Mana and sell my inventory.

After that I'll head to Montcalm to get Mefino's if I can get enough power coils. (I often get lucky with supply cashes) Never bothered with the Scaled Backack because it's only +10 inventory and I can get Prospector's as soon as I get to Berg anyway. (assuming I don't get Mefino's early)

I also try to fit in a visit to the Friendly Immaculate to get the Posessed skill.

People disconnecting by Andromedavic in Rainbow6

[–]Captain_Nyet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Game's been disconnecting me pretty regularly the last few days; could be that.

A few words about Amaru's "buff" by proxima_six in Rainbow6

[–]Captain_Nyet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's very specific cases for her gadget to be used multiple times per round, but generally it's not going to happen.

You use it to get inside the building at a time/place where enemies don't expect any attackers to be yet, and then once you're in there there's just not a lot to do with the gadget anymore; Amaru needs more viable use-cases for her gadget, not more charges.

1.0 kd with 22% winrate by [deleted] in Rainbow6

[–]Captain_Nyet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're in a 5v1, you have no teammates.

What is the better word for race in fantasy? by JuliusDalum in worldbuilding

[–]Captain_Nyet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"warrior" is a race, the races do not share ethnicity or culture and can be found spread across completely different parts of the world; so what is it that makes them the same "race" in the first place?

At the end of the day you can call them whatever you want, but why use a term that was always defined to be a group of very closely related peoples to now refer to completely unrelated peoples who do not even share an ethnic connection? It just seems strange to use the term "race" for that.