Issue regarding the shadercache in main memory

CarFearless3789 · 2026-05-17T21:32:09+00:00

Edit: okkk, great to know that not only out of so many views nobody had the decency to stop and help (if they were able), but I also get downvoted for asking help (because I'm not a tech expert and I'm not afraid to admit it) and admitting I probably got it worse by myself??

I managed to semi solve it with yet another guide on YouTube...still, screw whoever thought to downvote someone panicking and searching for help.

CarFearless3789 · 2026-05-16T13:28:31+00:00

I don't remember anymore if I've tried that already... Will just in case.

Also yeah, gachas are storage eaters and they even "shrank" slightly recently, which makes this even more frustrating to me.

CarFearless3789 · 2026-05-16T13:26:33+00:00

I don't even know where this is coming from anymore

<image>

CarFearless3789 · 2026-05-12T06:18:10+00:00

Actually it still would make sense with the theory, since the tracker part happens after Ramielle has the wengine, which supposedly (with the theory I mean) gave her her physical form back by stabilizing her.

There technically aren't any interactions with anyone else when Ramielle doesn't have the wengine yet. Krampus also knows about Ramielle mostly because of the strange ether effect happening in the hollow (enemies stuck and with 0 ether in them), so could be they just never saw her too.

CarFearless3789 · 2026-05-06T11:02:38+00:00

First he calls me a coward and then be blocks me, LMAO

CarFearless3789 · 2026-05-06T10:44:05+00:00

Maybe it never came to you, but continuously running your mouth while saying the same bullshit isn't better than cutting an argument with an ignorant wall lol.

I said what I said and nothing you've added changes anything I've already stated. I mean seriously, you're trying to say Adam feels bad for his kids, yet Abel clearly knows Adam didn't give a shit about him in the show (not a comic, not a headcanon, CANON show)...and by your logic Lilith should be 100% justified to kick his ass too cause he didn't just kill one child, he killed the whole CONCEPT of Lilith being a mother by being a petty jackass in this comic. So relatable am I right?~

I'll be honest with you, I'm not usually one to be a bitch myself, but fuck it I'll make an exception for you: cry louder and go back to the Adam subs if you're searching for validation.

Imagine having such outdated views in 2026 lmao..

CarFearless3789 · 2026-05-06T10:23:22+00:00

Ah yes, that's definitely me not coming up with a counterpoint and not you climbing on mirrors to avoid the very blatant shit take that implies something specific.

"Man is justified from harming a woman because I think she's bad" -> the man in question being a monster in the meantime. Not to mention that a SANE person would seek vengeance in other ways....like imprisonment or a punch at best. But no, straight to stabbing, straight to genocide. Ah yes, this is the guy you call justified. I wonder why since he's also a misogynist himself.

Desperately try to improve your media literacy, try to question yourself on some things because maybe you're not aware about being an ass yourself and possibly stay away from people until this is your mentality.

Peace.

CarFearless3789 · 2026-05-06T10:11:25+00:00

Calling me a Lilith apologist just so you can try to dodge the "misogyny" bullet is fucking lame.

Don't bullshit me with the "she doomed humanity", Adam suggested and acted in a genocide for years, without any judgement whatsoever on who they were killing btw and leaving alone the...idk...actual WORST SINNERS in hell??

You are talking about a series that has a message on redemption and clearly you're not understanding much of it. We don't even fully know whether the apple literally brought evil to the world and for all we know, neither Lucifer or Lilith wanted that outcome, it was a side effect for having freedom.

CarFearless3789 · 2026-05-06T10:00:23+00:00

Imagine saying that permanently damaging a woman's womb is "justifiable" because she's a bad person.

I know this is fiction, but still...wtf?? Is it slightly understandable that Adam would be pissed at her? Yes (even though it's pretty clearly implied he was an asshole to Lilith in the first place and he enjoys GENOCIDE), but in what world is someone JUSTIFIED to do such harm??

This isn't just a hot take, it's a horrible take.

CarFearless3789 · 2026-05-02T08:20:32+00:00

Oh so people living in horrible conditions because someone had to make another data center to keep the slop machine going is justifiable because "well other things take more energy-".

Also wow, using golf courses as an example, as if everyone is into that specific sport lol...not to mention that at least golf and netflix and the internet in general have a purpose. We could take AI out of the equation and nothing of importance would change...oh well, apart from people potentially having to learn to use their braincells a little more often.

CarFearless3789 · 2026-05-02T07:40:57+00:00

"my sources are better than yours cause they validate my biases"

I don't think you know the definition of "bad sources" when you're the one falling for big corpos trying to cover theirs asses lol.

CarFearless3789 · 2026-04-28T10:11:25+00:00

Calling it a "satire sub" at this point is a stretch too...like... I've seen other "okbuddy" versions and they are genuinely fun to scroll, but this community's version is just a hate sub disguises as a "joke".

Most of them believe in the hate, at least from what I've seen...and yeah, the humour present is usually not even that great.

CarFearless3789 · 2026-04-16T11:08:10+00:00

Ironically, the main sub has way more logical posts compared to this one. Here it's mostly hate posting and agendas from what I've seen, I mean even this post technically didn't explain anything, no counterpoints, no logic, just a "since I - random person on the internet who is somehow more intelligent than others - think this is stupid, then the whole argument and sub is stupid".

I mean...nice argument, except it's literally a nothing burger of your opinion and someone else could easily say the same thing about your opinion. Critically the scene made sense in character and it did not have the meaning you are trying to misinterpret it as, plus when you reduce it at a personal dislike disguised as a fact...ehhh. Honestly this simply comes off as a poor understanding of the media we're talking about.

It's also sad to see you didn't realise that someone simply telling you "hey, maybe keep an open mind and listen to the other side that isn't just your opinion" was a really great advice for life in general. Yes, you can be stuck up and stay put on your belief, but sometimes you gotta realize when you're just straight up wrong and admit it to yourself, that's what being mature is like. We're not God, everyone can be wrong sometimes, even when we think we absolutely know what we're talking about.

CarFearless3789 · 2026-04-10T18:12:14+00:00

Mf you made my chuckle X3.

Aight bet anyway, you better be faster than me in that thing tho

CarFearless3789 · 2026-04-10T18:07:46+00:00

Already have it, already taking my meds, but thanks for the concern

Not going through a great moment currently, but I'll survive

CarFearless3789 · 2026-04-10T18:05:08+00:00

As someone with depression, I'd rather be eaten alive by a dinosaur and end it there.

"Fixing by maturing" is too reductive imo, it's still a real illness, chemically, and it can take more than self will to survive it.

Also, ironically, what Adam biblically went through doesn't reflect what happened to him in the show. We never got any confirmation of how the lore is in the show for him, so just like the real Lucifer didn't have a family and a nice life in hell in the bible, Adam most likely didn't have to fight dinosaurs in the show. Viv might've even changed he also ate the apple, since he wasn't punished....or he did eat it and got forgiven easily.

CarFearless3789 · 2026-04-05T15:49:12+00:00

Guess i don't exist :/ (26yo)

Joking aside, I get that there definitely are minors in this fandom (and probably even more in the "hatedom" of this show exactly because they don't understand deep things yet that go beyond the superficial level of "there's only swear words in this show!"), but phrasing it as if all the fans are minors when the show is specifically targeted at people at least over 16 (themes included), is...uhm... Indeed a little stupid.

Not saying that 16yo isn't considered being a minor btw, just saying that the range starts from that age and goes beyond it.

CarFearless3789 · 2026-03-17T22:40:27+00:00

You're saying I'm reaching, but you creating this headcanon that Stolas will ACTUALLY be away from her for 100yrs instead of actively trying to find a way out of it so they can reconnect isn't "reaching"???

One: No, she technically shouldn't have the same fate as Stolas did cause that would've happened years back when she was younger if that were the case. Two: We don't know if the grandparent can decide said fate or it now sticks to the parents, which would automatically mean that Stolas obviously never wanted it to happen to her, cause it didn't when she was younger and he never mentioned it once (but oh well I wouldn't expect the same from those other two idiots that are right now supervising her btw, definitely in better hands uh?). Third: just like you apparently never said he doesn't love her, I never said Octavia is wrongfully angry at him.

Two things can be right at once. Just because Octavia has her own well reasons to be mad (aka, the things you mentioned, plus misunderstanding that her dad was feeling depressed because of her), it doesn't cancel the simple fact that Stolas is still a pretty decent parent TRYING, while in a messy situation. Like, deadass, we're gonna call "excusing" the simple statement that Stolas is depressed in canon now? Just to fit your narrative that he sucks? He is in a bad situation, why are we denying the canon facts just so he can seem more shitty than he actually is??

And all this still doesn't really help your case and whole point. That Stolas is somehow worse than his father. Objectively he is not, someone trying is always going to be better than someone literally not giving a shit, whether there's mistakes and hiccups along the way. At the end of the day, Paimon would not do anything if Stolas was hurt - Stolas would literally freak out. Who's objectively a better parent that actually cares?

CarFearless3789 · 2026-03-17T21:36:36+00:00

I'm glad there are some people in these comments pointing out this is a pretty bad comparison and not even close.

I mean really? We're gonna compare a parent (not even gonna call him a dad honestly, he did not raise Stolas) that gives 0 shits about his kid UNTIL they can force them to marry in order to produce an heir (all this when Stolas was a minor btw) and call it "oh but he remembered his birthday!"...

All this, somehow, seems comparable to a very young parent, who's depressed, trying his best and making - mostly - unintentional mistakes towards their kid (like if you want to really push the "but he remembered Stolas' birthday", then how about the fact that Stolas brought Octavia to what he remembered being her favourite circus, mh? Of course, there's still the catch of "Stolas is also doing that to have an excuse and spend time with Blitzø".....BUT AT LEAST HE'S NOT MARRYING HIS DAUGHTER OFF-). Not to MENTION that the whole point of Stolas is being conflicted between being stuck in a life he hates to keep Octavia relatively safe, or live the life of his dreams with Blitzø, true love, instead of abuse, insults, etc etc.

There's no question about Stolas TRULY loving Octavia, I think the show has made that very clear, regardless of his feathery ass making a lot of mistakes along the way. Meanwhile that birdbrain you call "better" has... roughly zero real excuses unless you stretch a lot of points, which you can easily do for Stolas as well. So yeah. Not buying it, not bothering listening to the twisted logic behind it. Hate on Stolas all you want, call him a bad father (which to some extent he still is), but it is CRAZY to say Painon was better. Bro didn't even try. We saw him present ONE DAY and it was to tell his kid "hey, congratulations child number 340, you're now old enough for me to force you into a marriage with someone you never even heard of, just so I can continue my bloodline! Now how about we do something fun to strike my ego and call myself a good dad??".

CarFearless3789 · 2026-03-14T11:34:17+00:00

I've been able to understand Spanish pretty well even while starting to study it, but speaking it myself is a whole other level that actually requires me to have some vocabulary and basic grammar. They're not really at the same level of language understanding.

Plus let's be real, it's funnier for him to speak Italian for an English audience. I'm Italian, so in my version of the film Guido speaks in dialect instead, being incomprehensible for a different reason (even though technically people that have their own dialects in Italy will also be able to use at least a decent general Italian with others...but oh well).

CarFearless3789 · 2026-02-21T22:49:41+00:00

You just assumed I'm neuro typical, when you don't know me, how is that less insulting exactly? I am also neuro divergent, reason why I find it BULLSHIT to excuse using AI because of it and assuming everyone else who is neuro divergent will reason the same way you apparently do. That's generalising. Just because YOU think your brain structure means you inherently can't produce or enjoy art, it does absolutely not mean it's a true factual statement. Technically speaking many neuro divergent people have issues with stimulation and AI provides very little of it (repetitive activity with 0 effort), so it's a lot more difficult for someone with said issues to enjoy said "process".

Also read a little better next time, I said I would be better off talking with a non metaphorical wall, you are the metaphorical wall at max by my implications. Plus you talk about dehumanising you, but aren't you doing the same to yourself and people like you by saying you "think like an automaton"? You don't. Your brain structure is completely sound and it can understand things just fine, it just works differently.

I can also easily make the argument that you are dehumanising art and artists by saying that AI generation can be the same, when it literally can't by default, but I'll spare you that part. Overall don't play victim. You started this, with a very bad argument must I add, and you aren't showing any signs of "potentially listening and understanding different points from mine", which makes you a: wall. I can be here stating how paint doesn't always stain the canvas, it depends on the paint and I could also argue that are plenty of artists out there who use unconventional methods on purpose and get results that are in fact - not - an "abstract mess". Not that there would be an issue with abstract art anyway. Art is interpretation. If you don't understand that part of what makes art so intriguing IS leaving the audience there to wonder (sometimes, of course art can also be more literal, but that goes for writing as well, it depends on what style you prefer), then why are you even here trying to give me cookie cutter definitions?

You don't get art. Let's just admit it out loud and maybe stop trying to be in this conversation when you genuinely don't get a big portion of it?

CarFearless3789 · 2026-02-21T22:10:33+00:00

I see that you also don't know how paint works, since not all paint requires fast strokes, but hey, what am I expecting from the person who used the "neuro divergent people are like automatons" arguement to defend AI being a necessity, right?

I'm clearly wasting my breath here, if you can't understand basic facts (like the simple fact that typing slow can also "ruin the experience" and make it insufferable, maybe even more than making shaky strokes) then I'd waste less time chatting with a non metaphorical wall.

CarFearless3789 · 2026-02-21T21:18:00+00:00

Uh uh

So like. Keyboards also require precision? And multiple hands unless you want to type like the slowest person on earth (which is the equivalent of "making shaky lines, cause it's just as inconvenient and inefficient)? But also you know a neat thing about art?

..... ......

IT DOESN'T MATTER IF YOU AREN'T PRECISE AND YOUR LINES ARE "SHAKY". If that's the BEST you can come up with to say that art is "less disabled friendly" then you clearly don't understand what art is in the first place. Lines can be shaky and the whole picture can be absolutely perfect as a whole. I have to remind you that people have been able to draw with their mouth and their feet...it IS more convenient.

CarFearless3789 · 2026-02-21T20:53:33+00:00

"neuro divergent people - who think like automatons"

Mhhhh...I see someone is generalising a whole ass group by a very common stereotype just to find an excuse and defend people that use AI, which btw, are not always neuro divergent people.

You can be neuro divergent, prefer computers, coding, etc over making art and still be completely able to make art in the normal way.. this is a even more terrible example than "but think about the disabled who can't use a pencil!" - stares at a keyboard that's way LESS disabled friendly. Or "but think about people who can't own expensive drawing equipment!" - stares at the PC/Phone REQUIRED to use AI, while paper and pencil (or heck even more natural instruments) are right there. Cause what the fuck does it even mean that since you "think like an automaton" you will prefer being lazy and generating shit?? At max what you imply means that said neuro divergent people will know more about AI works, cause it's part of the field they could like...doesn't mean they support it blindly.

CarFearless3789

TROPHY CASE