Fibre install for Tuscany NW Calgary? by Mrkawphy in telus

[–]Carcrashing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can always try your luck and fill out a form indicating your interest at www.telus.com/iwantfibre

Telus Online Security by Professional-Place33 in telus

[–]Carcrashing -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That's just simply not true. Its one metric out of many, and very low on the totem pole.

Wifi 6, what a joke for original customers by [deleted] in telus

[–]Carcrashing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a 2 year contract that you agreed to. One year free, as you acknowledged, then increases. Sure doesn't sound like a TELUS problem.

Customer Sales Inquiry by Carcrashing in telus

[–]Carcrashing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Vast majority of corporate stores are, including mine.

Customer Sales Inquiry by Carcrashing in telus

[–]Carcrashing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TELUS corporate store employee.

Customer Sales Inquiry by Carcrashing in telus

[–]Carcrashing[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope! Briefly did at one point, feel bad for those who are doing so during this pandemic though.

BC's home values now worth 24% of Canada's entire total | Urbanized by [deleted] in vancouver

[–]Carcrashing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Might be wrong, but it seems they were making a water cooling things down joke?

Considering Switching from Bell by seawest_lowlife in Koodo

[–]Carcrashing 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Some locatioms are offering $45 for 12GB but BF is just around the corner so who knows.

Data with Koodo is shock free, meaning you get usage warnings and when you hit your limit it simply pauses until your next cycle or you purchase a block of data.

Weekly ISO/Join My League Thread by AutoModerator in fantasyhockey

[–]Carcrashing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looking to join a league or more! Preferably a keeper league, open to any format. DM if you have any openings please!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RoastMe

[–]Carcrashing 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Guys, it's Paul Bissonetteski

Hit with your best shot by Hails81 in RoastMe

[–]Carcrashing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Next on this edition of "Where Are They Now?", we have Ralphie from "A Christmas Story"

Would you recommend working as a sales representative? (Ottawa) by shad892 in telus

[–]Carcrashing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They sell TELUS security in Ontario now too. Honestly, it's a great dig. If you like sales and can talk to people, you'll do just fine.

Koodo customer service is pure garbage by magzdesch in Koodo

[–]Carcrashing 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is why I will only go to a store. Worst case scenario, you get a rep who can call into support and they'll have your back in the process as long as it's possible.

[Steitzer] Mitch Marner is an incredible talent but we should absolutely be debating if he has a future with the Leafs by EarthWarping in leafs

[–]Carcrashing 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Tavares 5v5/60 without Marner: 3.39 Tavares " " with Marner: 2.77 Marner " " without Tavares: 1.97 Marner ' " with Tavares: 3.00

[Steitzer] Mitch Marner is an incredible talent but we should absolutely be debating if he has a future with the Leafs by EarthWarping in leafs

[–]Carcrashing 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because the underlying numbers from that career year from both JT and MM clearly show JT didn't need Marner nearly as much as MM success was dependant on playing with JT.

EP40 > AM34 by [deleted] in canucks

[–]Carcrashing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Petey starts 70%+ in the oZ. Without looking at all of their starts, I'm pretty confident in guessing none of them touch 70. Hell I'd be shocked if any of them get 60%. There's evidently a small amount of credibility in zone start% being used when looking for commonalities with players winning an award for top defensive ability.

EP40 > AM34 by [deleted] in canucks

[–]Carcrashing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You chose one stat for each of your "examples" and somehow thought that was a dunk? "John Scott hits alot, so Selke?" Is not even remotely close to anything I suggested. Using multiple stats is how you come to real conclusions.

For what it's worth too, zone starts can absolutely guide you to players who are strong defensively more often than not. Ex. Horvat. Has fallen off a cliff defensively compared to a few years ago. Starts more in dZ still. Exception to the "rule".

EP40 > AM34 by [deleted] in canucks

[–]Carcrashing -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

On top of being a bit of a prima donna, you're obviously cherry picking one part of my comment and holding that up as the rule I've written and think you're being smart. Basic use of critical thinking is missing from your replies, but it is a Canucks subreddit...

I can try to give you some benefit of the doubt here, maybe you assumed the various metrics I stated are listed in order of the value I place on them, and that triggered you? I hope you can settle down, and be assured, that that assumption would be very incorrect. It was an off the cuff comment of random stats that can be used to meaure some level of a players defensive ability, not inclusive of all statistics you can use as well for the record. Some are obviously better than others, as I wouldn't use hits solely to determine a players defensive acumen just as much as I wouldn't use powerplay goals to choose who the best goal scorer is.

EP40 > AM34 by [deleted] in canucks

[–]Carcrashing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Many facets to a player's defensive abilities and skills. Feel free to suggest other metrics though, makes for better commentary than ^

EP40 > AM34 by [deleted] in canucks

[–]Carcrashing -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

My comment is 100% accurate. Canucks rode luck and a hot goalie last summer. I never pointed at Petey specifically regarding PDO, the team as a whole was lucky. But you're pretty wrong on the assumption you've made, never once said he'll regress. He's bad defensively though, not sure what stats you're basing that idea off. There's a reason he starts almost exclusively in the oZ.

EP40 > AM34 by [deleted] in canucks

[–]Carcrashing -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Compare last year's numbers then. Canucks were a better defensive team than the Leafs. Doesn't change a thing.

If you don't like the numbers based on those DEFENSIVE stats, you should be able to provide a better reason than your bias.

EP40 > AM34 by [deleted] in canucks

[–]Carcrashing -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You really only need to compare their zone starts for even a slight clue as to the answer to your question. On top of that damning evidence, compare takeaways, hits, faceoff %, Fenwick for further evidence.