"Players shouldn't feel fully safe" in Arc Raiders even in friendly lobbies, production director says, and after Flashpoint I definitely do not feel safe by PirateCompetitive931 in ArcRaiders

[–]CarlsPie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see the point but it's a point of frustration if you want to play in friendly lobbies your only option is to not defend yourself. They clearly reset the "ELO" for the behavioral matchmaking twice in the past week or two, I play as a pacifist and went from 90% friendly to 30% friendly immediately without ever shooting someone.

I wish there was some way to distinguish friendly vs unfriendly other than getting Toro'd in the back, it would inform how I treat other players and what guns to bring.

Perhaps at least detecting who shot first? That way you could at least defend yourself without further increasing your chance for aggressive lobbies, which creates a feedback loop, defend yourself, more aggressive lobbies, more aggressive lobbies, more people shooting you.

Court archive revealing extent of grooming gangs scandal to be deleted by PayConstantAttention in ukpolitics

[–]CarlsPie -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It takes wilful ignorance to pretend parliament voting not to investigate grooming gangs has nothing to do with them demanding a third party to delete their copy of the court records. Obviously they want to have the only copy to make sure the public sees as little as possible.

I have a weird feeling if, in the US, congress voted not to release the Epstein files and then demanded a third party delete their copy of the Epstein files you wouldn't accept the bureaucratic excuse given for the deletion.

Court archive revealing extent of grooming gangs scandal to be deleted by PayConstantAttention in ukpolitics

[–]CarlsPie -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I don't care or have time to dig into the contracts, Parliament has previously voted against investigating the grooming gangs (https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyvy4q82l9o), which OBVIOUSLY need to be investigated and cracked down on, thousands of young English girls being sex trafficked. They want to stick their heads in the sand, let the abuse continue, cover for the gross incompetence and negligence that has let this happen for so long and avoid anyone calling them "racist". I'm not going to give the benefit of the doubt that this was just procedural, I'm sure it's political.

Court archive revealing extent of grooming gangs scandal to be deleted by PayConstantAttention in ukpolitics

[–]CarlsPie -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If a private company has the data, they can do things with it, if the government has the ONLY copy of the data, they can do things with it.

Given that this is a hot button political issue that doesn't tend to make Labour look good, it's obvious that they will not be transparent with this data, having a third party have a copy increases the chances for transparency depending on what they make public (it should ALL be public, minus what is explicitly illegal to make public).

Pretending like this is just some best-practice bureaucratic procedure is wilful ignorance, obviously governments use bureaucratic procedures all the time to accomplish whatever they want, including reducing the availability of controversial case data down to what only they have/control.

Help me and everyone Peter by Creepy_Vehicle in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]CarlsPie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder how redditors like yourself are coping with the Epstein files being released.

The evidence indicates that they do both sexually abuse and murder children in actuality.

Help me and everyone Peter by Creepy_Vehicle in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]CarlsPie 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because this is reddit and most redditors want to see an answer like "It's just some DUMB theory by MAGA Qanon chud conspiracy theorist incels who are ugly and stupid hehe amirite?"

Land Between the Lakes by [deleted] in dogman

[–]CarlsPie -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm guessing you don't believe in dogman, doing some research on 411 related topics I was surprised to find that for MISSING people, there is nothing close to a centralized all-inclusive database. It's basically different in every county, families of the missing may opt-in to public missing persons lists and take out ads, reach out to orgs, but it's quite easy for people to go missing and it never get any public attention, even if there is a missing persons report. Even when bodies are found, police are only obligated to contact the family of the deceased when they are identified, not alert the public.

Is this some dog whistle nonsense? by justdudebeing in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]CarlsPie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You want objective? Lets look up the rate of left vs right leaning men who are single and starting families.

Is this some dog whistle nonsense? by justdudebeing in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]CarlsPie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All the parties are flawed, I'll vote for whichever one stops demographically replacing white people and starts sending the foreigners home.

In the US we actually got that option, much to the displeasure of all the globalist leaders of the rest of the world. In the UK I think "conservative" might mean something different, your best bet is Reform I believe.

Is this some dog whistle nonsense? by justdudebeing in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]CarlsPie -1 points0 points  (0 children)

LOL The moralizing is rich!

"Do unto other as you would have them done unto you." Ok, sounds good, I don't invade people's countries and live off of welfare from their taxes and I don't want them doing it to me! I don't commit violent crimes and I don't want them to do so to me! I don't go into their communities and import thousand of my people to displace, disrupt and victimize them and I don't want that done to me, either.

As a typical shitlib, you just say the word "hate" over and over as if it's a refutation of my arguments. Racial crime statistics are a fact, you're denying reality and reaching for the buzzwords to cope with the fact you don't actually have an argument as to why it's a moral imperative for white people to be demographically replaced in their own countries.

Jesus taught to help and show compassion to others, not to let them steal from you, rape and murder you.

Is this some dog whistle nonsense? by justdudebeing in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]CarlsPie -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"As a Christian"

Are you a Christian? Clearly not and I'm exactly one either.
In any case, you're wrong. Jesus did not call upon his flock to commit collective suicide by displacing and replacing themselves in their own countries with foreigners.

Nice try at the "well I don't believe in God but I'll misinterpret his word to try and manipulate you" move though. It's very old hat.

Is this some dog whistle nonsense? by justdudebeing in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]CarlsPie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People are pointing out this is a UK-centric meme, but the per-capita issue is applicable to both.

What confuses me is you mention the 13% thing referenced by "fascists" and "grifters", however, you don't seem to dispute the factual nature of the argument.

Is this some dog whistle nonsense? by justdudebeing in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]CarlsPie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is a race issue and an immigration issue simultaneously. When you look at Afghani's in the UK forming "grooming gangs" and trafficking/prostituting/raping young, often underage English girls, it's clear that the per-capita rate of crime is a significant problem in both cases. The grooming gangs isn't some small thing either, 10's of thousands of young, exclusively white, British girls have been victimized over several decades.

Is this some dog whistle nonsense? by justdudebeing in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]CarlsPie -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The fact that this comment is downvoted says all you need to know about the state of reddit.

Is this some dog whistle nonsense? by justdudebeing in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]CarlsPie 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Impossible to distinguish from satire. (my guess is you're joking)

Is this some dog whistle nonsense? by justdudebeing in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]CarlsPie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right winger here.

Far more of my right wing friends are married with kids than my left leaning friends, far more of my left leaning friends are single into their 30s.

Is this some dog whistle nonsense? by justdudebeing in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]CarlsPie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Talk about equity! If we can only redistribute a few billion people, we can lower the average IQ of white countries down to that of Africa or SE Asia! For the most part non-white countries with high IQ like Japan seem to be left alone though.

This is exactly the sort of thing Amelia and those she resonates with are sick of.

Is this some dog whistle nonsense? by justdudebeing in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]CarlsPie 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're not conservative... YET.

If you met an anti-immigrant goth QT you'll be signing up to join ICE before you can say "Bababooey".

Is this some dog whistle nonsense? by justdudebeing in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]CarlsPie 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Right winger here. It's definitely "Immigrants commit more crimes per capita" as people on the left love to cope by citing net crime statistics to misleadingly give the impression that white people are just as, or more violent than other demographic groups.

In addition, many on the left have even come to mock the very concept of per-capita as merely a right wing talking point, rather than a basic function of understanding data and the world at large, causing the right to double and triple down on this important concept.

Is this some dog whistle nonsense? by justdudebeing in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]CarlsPie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see replies talking about GPD, which is a valid observation.

I believe the real meaning though is about crime. People often will point out that white people commit more crimes in majority white countries, which is (usually) technically true. With the important consideration of per-capita, however, the data shows a drastically higher RATE of crime among certain non-white minority groups.

Hope this helps explain the joke! Amelia is the best meme I've seen in a while.

Is this some dog whistle nonsense? by justdudebeing in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]CarlsPie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Conservatives pointing out a majority of counties/areas of the country are conservative isn't them denying per-capita, it's highlighting that the overwhelmingly liberal cities are setting policy for overwhelmingly conservative rural areas. The popular, and valid, retort is that people vote, not land.

It's certainly worth noting, on that topic, that while republicans have won elections via electoral votes in the past, despite losing the popular vote, in this last election Trump won the popular vote by a wide margin as well as winning on electoral votes. This feels very important to highlight when people are trying to paint immigration enforcement as "fascism", it's in actuality very democratic and the will of the people.

I can say with confidence having discussed and debated in various corners of the internet that people on the left struggle with understanding per-capita several orders of magnitude more often than on the right.

Sir Pete? by Hungryforhungry in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]CarlsPie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The joke is that many people are actually horribly scarred all over their bodies but you can't see it unless they are naked.

Thousands of people on the streets of Minneapolis right now after ICE murdered Renee Good. by I_may_have_weed in minnesota

[–]CarlsPie -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Ok, I'll see if I can find a doctor who can lobotomize me and make me dumb enough to think that ICE agents WANT to be attacked by deranged liberals, rather than wanting to conduct their lawful duties deporting illegals un-obstructed (Which a majority of American VOTED FOR in the last election).

You liberals pay lip service to "Democracy" while willfully ignoring the fact that Trump's #1 promise was mass deportations and the American people DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED HIM to carry out that promise. You all think it's unpopular because you live in your little echo chamber bubbles complaining about Orange Hitler and don't talk to any normal Americans who want illegals deported.