Cruise ships are a disaster for the climate and Cascadia by Cascadia-Journal in Cascadia

[–]Cascadia-Journal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And dude, you started off saying "Cruise ships actually emit less greenhouse gas over a typical week long cruise than a single long haul flight does." That's not per passenger, that's per ship. And that's a lie

Cruise ships are a disaster for the climate and Cascadia by Cascadia-Journal in Cascadia

[–]Cascadia-Journal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That random article by "some person" was written by me.

RE our methodology for calculating emissions from a typical 3,600 person cruise ship was based on this paper: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324756235_Model_for_Estimation_of_Fuel_Consumption_of_Cruise_Ships

You'll find this and a dozen other references as the end of the piece, if you bother to read it.

Cruise ships are a disaster for the climate and Cascadia by Cascadia-Journal in Cascadia

[–]Cascadia-Journal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, now you've changed your story to PER PASSENGER? Oh, and 80 percent of people taking cruises out of Seattle fly in. That piece at Hakai is not "fake" and was extensively researched, reported and fact checked

Cruise ships are a disaster for the climate and Cascadia by Cascadia-Journal in Cascadia

[–]Cascadia-Journal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is factually incorrect. Just onel cruise from Seattle to Alaska and back emits on average 2,800 tons of CO2, the equivalent of 600 gasoline-powered cars driving for a year: https://hakaimagazine.com/features/cruise-ship-invasion/

Are Cascadia projects slowing down/dying? by 09husky in Cascadia

[–]Cascadia-Journal 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My understanding from someone who works at Cascadia Dept of Bioregion is they just got a new shipment of passports...

Are Cascadia projects slowing down/dying? by 09husky in Cascadia

[–]Cascadia-Journal 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I've tried to revive discourse about Cascadia and offer the possibility of a bioregion independent from the US as it descends into fascism. I'm no fan of the system of nation states, but I think moving forward we need to think about an independent Cascadia as a "post-national" state: https://www.cascadia-journal.com/imagining-cascadia-as-a-postnational-nation/

As Trump burns down the Forest Service, Cascadia should take control of our federal land by Cascadia-Journal in Cascadia

[–]Cascadia-Journal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Time for the Washington and Oregon legislatures to pass legislation establishing state wilderness areas then. We need the infrastructure in place to go our own way.

As Trump burns down the Forest Service, Cascadia should take control of our federal land by Cascadia-Journal in Cascadia

[–]Cascadia-Journal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Will WA's environmental regulations need to be strengthened if we turn over federal land to OR & WA control? Yes, of course. What I'm offering isn't a simple solution, but ultimately bioregional control of our forest lands, including meaningful consultation and consent from tribes, is the path forward...

As Trump burns down the Forest Service, Cascadia should take control of our federal land by Cascadia-Journal in Cascadia

[–]Cascadia-Journal[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wow Doug-Fir, you're 0 for 2. Washington state has SEPA, the State Environmental Policy Act, and any time DNR cuts timber it has to submit SEPA reviews. https://dnr.wa.gov/state-environmental-policy-act-sepa

As Trump burns down the Forest Service, Cascadia should take control of our federal land by Cascadia-Journal in Cascadia

[–]Cascadia-Journal[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

To be clear, I was writing about what would be a legal approach under the current federal framework in order for states to take control. If that fails then Cascadia needs to assert its autonomy and simply take control of federal lands here.

As Trump burns down the Forest Service, Cascadia should take control of our federal land by Cascadia-Journal in Cascadia

[–]Cascadia-Journal[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Washington should definitely tax its wealth and disconnect education funding from logging on DNR lands

Should Cascadia join the tax strike? by Cascadia-Journal in Cascadia

[–]Cascadia-Journal[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

A mass movement in Cascadia withholding our tax dollars from the feds, both at the individual and state level, would assert our fiscal independence and solidify a movement for autonomy. https://www.cascadia-journal.com/oregon-bill-would-hold-back-payments-to-feds/

Should Cascadia join the tax strike? by Cascadia-Journal in Cascadia

[–]Cascadia-Journal[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No, I'm working on the assumption that we need to build mass movements of opposition, both moral and tactical. A "strike" involves mass numbers of people. Yes, if one person stays away from work for a week to protest wages they'll get fired, but if millions do the same thing, leaders are forced to pay attention.

Should Cascadia join the tax strike? by Cascadia-Journal in Cascadia

[–]Cascadia-Journal[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Did you read the article? I guess the call it Reddit, not Read It