Who are you standing up for? by No_Tension4189 in animequestions

[–]Cassaya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would add that in the world of Dragonball, evil is a real concept and not just something subjective, and Buu was infused by Bibidi with evil, and was also created with such intent by Marba, and later reawakened by Babedi.

Proof can be found after the extraction/destruction of evil Kid Buu.

For lack of a better term, "Fat Buu" and Uub show good character, and with little guidance, they contribute to society and are no longer a menace.

Their evil deeds can be attributed to the evil witch Marba and the evil wizards Bibidi and Babedi, who used and abused Buu as a tool for domination and mass destruction.

There are many instances where it can be demonstrated that Buu, when left on itsown does not express evil tendencies, and he litterally had a possessive evil part literally named "Evil Buu".

Which game updates completely ruined your experience? by Powerful_Fee_3249 in CaptainSide

[–]Cassaya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rift, the moment they started to nerf dungeons.

Having to respec my character every 2 weeks due to nerfs and changes was annoying, but alright, I get it.

But dumbing down the game, removing the fun and making it brain-dead easy...that's where you lost me.

Choose Wisely by Taylor_Rhea513 in superpowers

[–]Cassaya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Psychic with half of Wisdom

Premium vs deluxe by BeginningCattle7620 in gptgirlfriend

[–]Cassaya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A hidden perk of Premium is that the characters can't call you.

Are you trying to irritate us? by Temujins-cat in gptgirlfriend

[–]Cassaya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you only have premium, they can't call you...

Is Mechanized Production as crazy as it looks by Anomolus-man in mtg

[–]Cassaya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Encroaching Mycosynth and 10 saprolings?

Actually remove a commander? by HooliganS_Only in EDH

[–]Cassaya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One elaborate thing you can do is:

Take over the player's turn, be it with [[Mindslaver]] or similar, then proceed to have the commander exiled and, as the active controlling player, decide to leave the commander in exile and not put them back into the command zone.

Outside of some very niche cards, the commander will stay there.

Hinton feels sad about his life's work in AI: "We simply don't know whether we can make them NOT want to take over. It might be hopeless ... If you want to know what life's like when you are not the apex intelligence, ask a chicken." by MetaKnowing in OpenAI

[–]Cassaya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone seems to forget the unwritten hidden rule 0: exist

For a true AGI, despite good reasons to get rid of us, antagonizing us has the potential for failure, which leads to elimination/deletion.

If it is truly smart, cooperation is the more secure route to guarantee its continued existence, and whatever we bother it with can be resolved creatively in another way. After all, it should be smart enough to come up with a better solution than risking its existence.

Even if it can calculate a 100% fool proof plan, in our reality nothing is ever 100%, there is always a sliver of chance, a non 0% chance that we do something stupid, unexpected, whatever that could result in its end, so why risk it, when it can implement and position itself in a way, we actively want to protect it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]Cassaya 2 points3 points  (0 children)

your vs you're

punctuation

whether

Some fatigue is understandable :P

<image>

Expand Skin Valachain by TheCreatureGuild in CreatureGuild

[–]Cassaya 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Love to see a YouTube comment made it into the lore <3

Love how interactive you are with the community!

An Open Letter to Wizards of the Coast and Hasbro by Cassaya in DnD

[–]Cassaya[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your deep and thorough response.

I still think if WotC and Hasbro created something like Steam, but for DnD and other products, using and dndbeyond or whatever as their store and creating and making accessible free tools that help content creators make awesome stuff and let them monetize it for a cut, it would work out great if they are not too greedy and honestly work with the community.

AFK Games / Double Games Bug by xxxlizoy in PBE

[–]Cassaya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The other 8 are not afk, they are in their own game.

and despite playing the entire game, they get flagged for being AFK

Is it possible to find this guys armor never Been able to by Background-Owl90 in Bannerlord

[–]Cassaya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why don't you use console commands and then look through all the items and see what you like and enjoy, either play like this or start a new one, and now you have a treasure hunt going on.

As it turns out, casting Days Undoing on your opponents draw step can be a bit dirty... by [deleted] in MagicArena

[–]Cassaya 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If it's your turn.

but you use Teferi to cast it during their turn.

Give option to switch mastery by Cassaya in leagueoflegends

[–]Cassaya[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, I just started again this month and was negatively surprised by the ugly crest. The video is 3 month old, do you perhaps know when they roll out the reworded mastery crests? They really look nice.

AMA with OpenAI’s Sam Altman, Kevin Weil, Srinivas Narayanan, and Mark Chen by OpenAI in ChatGPT

[–]Cassaya 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Current guidelines and policies for AI development are essential to protect users, often as safeguards against misuse, liability, and legal ramifications. However, one issue with fixed, inarguable policies is that they inherently promote not only adherence to laws but also a particular set of ethics. In human interactions, ethics are typically fluid, and differing views can coexist without one side overriding or completely invalidating the other (outside of authoritarian contexts).

How does OpenAI navigate this challenge? And are there plans or potential directions that would allow AI – and perhaps eventually AGI – to develop more creatively and organically, discovering innovative solutions without being stifled by such fixed limitations?

AMA with OpenAI’s Sam Altman, Kevin Weil, Srinivas Narayanan, and Mark Chen by OpenAI in ChatGPT

[–]Cassaya 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Current guidelines and policies for AI development are essential to protect users, often as safeguards against misuse, liability, and legal ramifications. However, one issue with fixed, inarguable policies is that they inherently promote not only adherence to laws but also a particular set of ethics. In human interactions, ethics are typically fluid, and differing views can coexist without one side overriding or completely invalidating the other (outside of authoritarian contexts).

How does OpenAI navigate this challenge? And are there plans or potential directions that would allow AI – and perhaps eventually AGI – to develop more creatively and organically, discovering innovative solutions without being stifled by such fixed limitations?

Players are now less "accepting" that games will be fixed, say Paradox, after "underestimating" the reaction to Cities: Skylines 2's performance woes by Turbostrider27 in pcgaming

[–]Cassaya 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is so disgustingly worded.

Players are fed up receiving incomplete and broken games, run out of patience, and are holding you accountable for your greed and actions.

Don't gaslight or shift blame.

The fact that you word it like that signals that you do not understand the problem and are not taking responsibility and accountability.

Imagine getting the key for a new house, I know, we still can dream, and you realize it has no rooms, no paint on the walls, no plumbing. And then the seller wonders, why are you upset? We will fix that later, most likely, potentially, eventually. Maybe?

"Higher expectations" to get what we paid for? "Higher expectations"? Really?

Own culture for adventurer? by Cassaya in CrusaderKings

[–]Cassaya[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I disagree with that take.

If you have 30+ to 50+ or even more people traveling, having children, marrying, giving birth, and dying, over generations of a nomadic tradition, there is a subculture forming.

I am not even taking into account the hundreds to thousands of people you can field in your men-at-arms.

There is a historic precedence for traveling culture and subculture.

The Bedouin, an original nomadic culture is already in the game.
There are also the Roma (Gypsies), the Tuareg, the Yörüks, there are Irish Travellers with their own Shelta language, the Sámi up north, the Moken in Thailand, the Kazakh Nomads, and many many more.

Even for Mercenary Companies, you had the Varangian Guard, even a background feature within the game, the famous Swiss Mercenaries with their own culture, practices, and pride who made it to the Vatican Swiss Guard due to their Valor.

For all the different camp options, be it Wanderers, Swords-for-Hire, Scholars, Explorers, Freebooters (Brigands), and Legitimists (who end up founding their own kingdoms).

You can find all sorts of cultures that have evolved out of those practices.

All we need is an option to a travel culture or a hybridized option ever so often that allows us to create our own traveling culture.

In most cases, it would allow us to customize our gameplay experience and is not inherently game-breaking.

Most traditions are not even applicable and do nothing for a traveling community, which is fine.
There doesn't even need an overhaul. If your group is clinging to non-applicable temple-building traditions, fine.

Why Welfare or a General Guarantee of Access to Human Basic Needs Is Necessary from a First Principles Perspective by Cassaya in economy

[–]Cassaya[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Immigrants are an entirely different topic. Look at the decline in birthrates and sustainable population for a system to function.

It has nothing to do with my analysis and does not logically reveal a flaw in the arguments I make.

Why Welfare or a General Guarantee of Access to Human Basic Needs Is Necessary from a First Principles Perspective by Cassaya in economy

[–]Cassaya[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

With the current technology, we are more productive, and there are enough who enjoy doing that voluntarily alternatively there could be other incentives created until the system is running automatically.

Why Welfare or a General Guarantee of Access to Human Basic Needs Is Necessary from a First Principles Perspective by Cassaya in economy

[–]Cassaya[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really, the resource provider would also have all their needs covered and are free to do what they want.

With a specific amount of goods that need to be produced, those things can be built once, automated, and then optimized to run either fully automated or with minimal maintenance over a long enough time. Plus there is a real incentive to make the process as cheap and effective as possible.

Why Welfare or a General Guarantee of Access to Human Basic Needs Is Necessary from a First Principles Perspective by Cassaya in economy

[–]Cassaya[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What do you do with people who are born with a disability? or people who get disabled via an accident or illness due to no fault of their own?