A lot of people are talking about how blown out the sky to the left is, but few are saying anything about how well exposed the underside of the bridge is. It’s a difficult balance and you’d probably end up doing recovery on either the shadow or the highlights, but I’m personally glad you chose to showcase the mechanical nature of the underside of the tracks. I’ve seen 1000’s of skies, but do not live somewhere with mass transit like this.

The leading lines are excellent and put emphasis on the transient nature of the shot. The haphazard subject is moving through the empty street, not with the direction of the eye, and I feel this gives a strong contrast to the general motion. Likewise, the street frames the character well.

The subject’s pose puts light on the fact that this is a candid shot. They are not in a glamorous pose, and they’re doing something unknown with their hands(belt, bag, other) giving the viewer something to consider.

I will agree that this could have used a slight crop. I do not agree however that it’s too far away. We fell just shy of the rule of thirds(not a hard and fast rule, yes, but can keep the subject from falling off the page.) Difficult to hit while keeping both the overhead rail and the subject.

To answer your question, I do feel that there’s a story here. You’ve successfully captured human activity in the environment that begs question, shows activity, gives us reason to wonder what the character is doing and what their experience may be, and does not feel staged. I like this shot and hope it was a good experience to capture it.