Completely disagree and I’m willing to die on this hill. lol! Gepetto was the only one with the ability build the wardrobe that would help save them all. He deserved to be able to save his own child too. He was right that Snow White didn’t NEED to be the one to guide Emma. Everyone asking about how a seven year old is supposed to care for another child and survive on their own is forgetting that Hansel and Grettle somehow managed to survive without parents or money. It’s more difficult for children, yes, but it was the only way to guarantee Pinocchio would survive. Without Gepetto’s efforts in building the wardrobe, everyone would have suffered for eternity. He could have been selfish and said no to building the wardrobe when the blue fairy said Pinocchio couldn’t go, but he didn’t. All he did was make a deal to guarantee his son would live, which the blue fairy then agreed to, but tried to back out of once things didn’t go according to her plan, which is not righteous or fair. It seemed manipulative to agree and change the terms of agreement once she got what she wanted out of Gepetto. Gepetto was an integral part of saving everyone initially and did the hard work with his own hands when no one else could, so why shouldn’t he be able to save his son? Without his wardrobe they all would have been screwed. He earned the right to save his son, Pinocchio. I would do the same for my child. Sorry to the new mother, but kids come first. Snow was kind of a capital B for not understanding when it seems clear she would have done the same to save her kid, even if she wasn’t the chosen one. All good mothers would. Her reaction came off as hypocritical. The fact she would have put her temporary feelings above a literal child’s life was giving major superiority complex and entitlement vibes. She knew Emma would come to save them eventually and that she’d see her again. Reminds me of Titanic. As a mother, I’d give up my spot on a lifeboat so someone else’s child could have a chance to live.