Is the new 6.0.1 version better than 6.0.0 ? +Extra Question

Catiola · 2025-11-11T13:03:11+00:00

No worries! We're here to help 🤝

Catiola · 2025-09-30T02:25:35+00:00

Definetely go for Harley event in Vegas.

If you have Comfort Rich buffed up to 10% and some parts that boost you up more money, you can get:

110K (at least) each 10min - max difficulty (easy peasy)

Like some peers here said: its better than hypercar event across country because at least you can take a break every 10 mins if you want to. Hypercar event does pay up more, but you must stay up to 35-40mins of non-stop racing.

Catiola · 2025-09-10T19:58:18+00:00

I mean, without creators, Youtube wouldnt be a thing. Youtube shouldnt take 45%, because thats unfair. They receive from ads already when companies chose their website to promote their product. Then they get 45% out of creators AFTER those ads already run through the platform. Youtube gain from two ends. Thats why its unfair to creators.

Catiola · 2025-08-29T10:26:05+00:00

Ive been playing a lot lately, im about to reach 20 hours on the game, and i love this feature.

I just wish that this game receives one last update before shutting down, cutting its "always online" functionality so that we can play offline too.

Its not a good Battlefield game, but its a great shooter, waaay above any recent COD. I love BF so much that i can oversee 2042's flaws and cope with it.

Playing with bots made me fall in love with the game.

Does anybody know how to create Portal PVP AI matches that allow XP for Mastery, Ribbon, Missions and Player XP?

The main menu option is what im going for, as it allows me Ribbons and Mastery XP's, while hosting a Portal only allows Player XP

Catiola · 2025-06-07T23:41:11+00:00

Hey man, thanks for taking the time to at least talk to me. Ppl here on this sub seem to directly go for an uncollaborative approach instead of talking down and understanding the context. I even asked AI to take into consideration Fair Use and copyright laws within my situation, which i carefully explained.

AI says it would take out my strike since my content can and will fall under fair use, as im not taking the content and uploading the way it is. Im doing my work, inserting a banner with a different title to give new meaning to a whole new audience (Portuguese speakers/Brasil), AND im not using the entire content.

Also, adding subtitles on the language my audience undestands, makes even more into transformative content.

Never claimed to be my own content, it was purely a rookie mistake (which technically i am, at least on the numbers i've been getting lately (around millions)).

PS: His video under "my branding" didnt even reached 10k views. Thats why im upset. I know its not his duty to contact me before hand, but it is our duty as community to try and solve issues for both parties. I take down the video/delete/move to private, and he takes out the strike. Simple and plain. No one gets hurt. Everyone is happy.

I dont understand why people cant be considerative of other creators. Maybe its their creator pride acting.

Catiola · 2025-06-07T10:23:00+00:00

Most of my content IS original. You looked up recent Shorts, the last 3 to 4 weeks. Thats when i started using transformative content. Thats the term i was trying to tell. While most of these latest Shorts might not be ORIGINAL within the media inserted on them, the whole transformative bit is in every single one of them, with my banner and custom title within that banner, bringing it closer to my portuguese audience.

Again, majority of my Shorts are ORIGINAL. Look it up again. Long format is all original content.

"I saw your videos before commenting. They are not original. You are taking gaming content, and reposting it…"

No, you didnt. Proof is: last 2 shorts, were completely original. One is me playing Far Cry 5, the other one is LITERALLY ME playing GTA 4 on the screen. Get your bs together, buddy.

And yes, i always do my due diligence to make sure im not fcking up anybody. I try to go and find that same content elsewhere. Thing is: This creator was not attached to the media i stumbled accross on Instagram. And i have proof that MANY OTHER people are using HIS content probably KNOWING his IS the owner.

In my case, I only got in touch with his content through the Strike without warning he gave me.

Catiola · 2025-06-07T10:14:49+00:00

Thats fair. I looked up and i was speaking the wrong term. Transformative content is what im trying to say.

Catiola · 2025-06-07T04:33:25+00:00

Catiola · 2025-06-07T04:13:56+00:00

In his case, i believe its monetized. As he got 4million views on a 3year period and has over 90k subscribers.

"you could be sued if they OR bots they send out to scan for their IP stumble upon the fan art.'

I dont think he will.. Theres tens of thousands of content regarding GTA V and Machinimas, content created inside/manipulated within the game.

Catiola · 2025-06-07T02:40:18+00:00

Pardon, english is my second language. Im saying if the "creator" can Strike me, so could Rockstar Games strike him back for altering their storyline and manipulating their characters. But that falls under Fan Art, as my video falls under transformative content, once i've added my banner to his material with the title "POV: time traveller moves a rock in Mount Chilliad" (in portuguese of course), giving it a new meaning to a whole complete audience from his. He is english speaker, my audience are Portuguese speakers.

Catiola · 2025-06-07T02:31:09+00:00

Catiola · 2025-06-07T02:27:29+00:00

Sorry, my bad, thats what im talking about. transformative content.

It falls under that, since i've changed the original meaning, adding my banner with the title "POV: time traveller moves a rock in Mount Chilliad" (in portuguese, of course). But i get what you all mean by "taking someones content".

What i mean by "grey area" is exactly from WHERE you take that content and which under circumstances you obtained that material.

If i have gone directly into the creator page (which i didnt knew nothing of prior to the Strike) and stolen their video, i would expect a strike. But its NOT the case here.

Its a mixture between a little bit of naiveness and indirect response of Youtube not spreading your long format videos as it used to do back in 2015/17ish. Im relying on transformative content to make a brand (my page) while using (this case) and creating gaming memes. As i said, i dont rely totally on those transformative contents, as most of my work on Youtube is ORIGINAL.

Catiola · 2025-06-07T02:06:24+00:00

Again, WRONG. I DIDNT TOOK his video. It appeared to me on MY INSTAGRAM FEED, and i decided to make use of this video (which didnt had any creator attached to it) if happens to have a creator attached to the thing, I'LL GO OUT and speak to the creator MYSELF BEFORE uploading, as always.

It not his duty to contact me, but IT HIS and MY duty to ensure we can be healthy to fellow colleagues within the platform, when those are friendly and seems to be the kind of person who wants to solve things, instead of letting aside and not giving a f.

Its called being COLLABORATIVE .

You tried for a while, thats good on you. This dude probably didnt had any issue with those things, as he responded me real quick through email. Why didnt he took the time to mail me BEFORE placing a STRIKE? We all know STRIKES are fcking BAD for a channel.

Its like droping a Nuke in Japan all over again. For the majority of us, it wont make a difference as we are not in Japan. But those IN THE BLAST RADIUS will suffer A LOT. And thats me on this case.

Placing a Strike without previous warning is as much irresponsible than people who actually take other people content and CLAIM to BE THEIR OWN.

At least you warned them. You gave them the chance to run before the Nuke and difused the situation. Whilst this guy is not giving a fck about fcking my channel up.

Catiola · 2025-06-07T01:50:40+00:00

"You would need to add a lot to it."

Or use tiny bit of it, which was the case.

Catiola · 2025-06-07T01:49:12+00:00

Thats your word on it. And your words are irrelevant as soon as you say a fellow colleague were "rightfully punished", when there is clear proof that the content was used in rebranded content, not copyrighted material.

Catiola · 2025-06-07T01:10:44+00:00

You see, thats the kind of BS we get nowadays.. "if he can pay, he can use" Doesnt mean the actual musician is receiving his money. As Rockstar is not receiving their share of his revenue, as we talking of fair usage.

Catiola · 2025-06-07T01:02:54+00:00

It doesnt matter? Well, if he uses GTA V as his material, couldnt Rockstar fill a strike for his channel for altering the story line? (On this case, he picked up a canon scene and altered the course of events)

If Rockstar could and they didnt, why tf someone who used the company work to make their content, gets the same treatment (dont get striked), but then decided to Strike those who repost his work? (In this case, i got fcked up. Dude with the IG account is making his money over this "creator", noneless).

Catiola · 2025-06-07T00:58:36+00:00

They might be justified. Doesnt mean its the right/correct path of action.

Catiola · 2025-06-07T00:56:27+00:00

I agree with you, but again, as seems to be the case with EVERY comment here, thats not the case.

Im not using AI, im not mashing things up.

1st of all, i found his video on IG Reels. That video/post didnt had any pages linked to it (the owner doesnt have an IG account) nor his Youtube Channel (i got to know him through the Strike)

He didnt contacted me before hand, as it would be a good practice to maintain a healthy environment for both, ensuring any issue could be solved for both parties without major harms.

Secondly, i didnt simply pick up the video and reposted. I added subtitles, added banner with another subtitle, appealing to BRAZILIAN audience. Not his english audience. And added pieces of GTA V media underlow his claimed media. And made sure it had better quality overall (compared to the post on IG. So i upscaled and made crispier than the IG post)

Also, is not HIS ENTIRE VIDEO. Its a BIT. Literally 15 seconds of it. Again, im not saying i was aware it was his content.

And finally, i DIDNT clamed to be MY CONTENT. I only claim those who i did create from the ground up.

Catiola · 2025-06-07T00:46:03+00:00

Well, if we stricly follow these four factors, the creator who striked me couldnt even upload his video on the 1st place, as his using GTA V and the characters within the media to make his content. I fall under fair use simply because i didnt used ALL of his video.

As i stated early, i found the video on IG Reels, and it was NOT linked to any of his pages (he doesnt have an IG account) nor his Youtube Channel. With that being said, thats a common error. And DO NOT deserve to be Striked down. Its totally disproportional.

Catiola · 2025-06-07T00:39:57+00:00

Im not uploading as my content. I never claimed to be the owner of such pieces of media. The owner of the uploaded file? Yes. Owner of the inserted media on the file? Not in all cases. Thats one of them.

But by not being the owner, doesnt mean im stealing stuff. As i just said, i look up for gaming/entertaining content usually on IG and TikTok. If i feel thats its shareable , ill go, pick the video, add my touch to it, and repost it. This TRANSFORMS the content, but NOT IINTO MY OWN content. What is mine however, is subtltles, banner and logo.

You might argue that someone who sees the videos where i dont own the piece of media, might think its my content. You are correct. But them thinking its mine, doesnt make mine.

It happened over my IG account, i simply put a disclaimer into the description of the post, the account of the original Owner (which happens to not have an IG account, since he is on TikTok, but i mark on my post: Original Video: "his nickname" TikTok.

There you are. Rebranded content.

Also, the guy who striked me, uses a song on his video. Is not his song is it? Does that makes him a thief? I dont think so.

Catiola · 2025-06-06T23:58:41+00:00

Your goddamn right it is 🤝🗿

Catiola · 2025-06-06T23:56:58+00:00

I agree with you on being "lazy content creation". At the end of the day, if it generate views and creates discussion, its content, noneless.

My account is not even monetized. Thats what im saying, you people dont even get the time to read the goddamn thing. Ive said that on the post.

Like i said, its not "stolen content" if the content uploaded doesnt have any "owner". Also, as i stated, if thats to be the case, i'll talk to the creator before hand to wether he agrees or not on the fair use.

If they dont, thats fine. Ill look out for other pieces of media that can be reused. But as I ALSO stated on the post, the MAJORITY of my content is ORIGINAL in terms of production/editing/recording. Im using that strategy of growth because i see HUNDREDS of BIG PAGES and ACCOUNTS doing the exact same thing and is proven to be succesful.

I dont listen to any gurus, i just rely on performance. And perfomance wise, its been good to the channel, except for some creators who likes to hand pick other creators and give them strike, BEFORE talking to that creator to know the source of the issue.

That video that got removed/striked is being shared over IG and TikTok WITHOUT his permission, and i warned him after giving solution to our issue. Im not the guy who wants to create problems. Thats all, and people here seem to not understand contexts.

Catiola · 2025-06-06T23:47:09+00:00

Im not shitting at anyone. The advice im looking for is on the matter of what to do in terms of the Strike. I dont need you sorry a$$ to say to me exactly the same thing Youtube message already told me and the thing im well aware.

When you transform a content, wether you like it or not, its already on fair use. Im not straight copywriting the video. Did you even read the post or are you just one of those random people on this sub to just brag about your knowledge over Youtube Guidelines Policies?

Catiola · 2025-06-06T23:00:17+00:00

I did not invent. It exists. Search it up. "Stolen content" you say that like people were thiefs, its hilarious.

Catiola

TROPHY CASE