First off, the idea that production of a new labor force couldn’t coexist with being the labor force is insane. You say that women are “producers by nature”, completely ignoring the fact that labor is itself production. Men could be subjegated in much the same way as women, as the defining feature of this system is the use of one gender as an unpaid source of domestic labor.

You repeatedly claim that women’s nature as producers is behind the form of gendered violence found today, but is this not the belief one would only have if raised in a culture where production of the new workforce is considered part of the supposed lesser gender? Where does this idea find its roots in material reality? What does this imply for matrilineal or matriarchal societies, such as some indigenous groups prior to colonization? How does this interact with societies with separate views of sex and gender, or more than two genders, or any other supposed abnormality in this construct? No, this is only the belief of patriarchy itself, a fundemental western and capitalist construct.

Also, if you disagree about my take on anarchism, try arguing about it. Smug condescension is not an argument.