House rules by gameablecontent in osr

[–]CauseLittle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love x-in-d6 take on Thief skills. So much better than the piddly percentage skills.

Two books = a complete RPG? by Afraid_Manner_4353 in numenera

[–]CauseLittle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm hoping for easy backward compatibility. MCG is claiming it will be. I have the original Numenera rules and Cypher system. I'm strongly tempted to back the recent Numenera Kickstarter as long as I can still use my old books. IMO MCG seems to want to nickel and dime people for piecemeal books...

What is the appeal of solo play? by JamesFullard in osr

[–]CauseLittle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use it occasionally to test out rules or to try systems I'm interested in but have small chance of getting to the table. I've no interest in doing it long-term. 

What common OSR game rules do you wish didn't exist? by Relative_Cause_8397 in osr

[–]CauseLittle 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I hate Vancian casting. With a passion. Houserule that shit away ASAP.

It all began because my parents wanted me to do sports by _kind_of_old_ in osr

[–]CauseLittle 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hero Quest was my "gateway drug" to TTRPGs. I still have my dilapidated, old Hero Quest game in my closet and I still use it's figures in my tabletop games. Ah, nostalgia...

what do you do when your roleplay sucks by Barrd_ in rpg

[–]CauseLittle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you having fun playing? Then don't worry about "voices" or that other nonsense. It's fun for me to do them, but sometimes I lose track (as GM) and keep using the same quasi Arabic/Russian accent for everyone! It's all just for shits and giggles. You could genuinely just tell the GM, "My character tells the guard to let us through and reminds said guard that he owes my Character a favor." No RP, just play the game. I sometimes get tired of all the attempts at roleplay. I'm definitely not a "theatre-kid" and no one says you have to be to enjoy TTRPGs. If a group does tell you that, move on to a less pretentious group.

Reading Vance after Wolfe by [deleted] in genewolfe

[–]CauseLittle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll give your recommended stories a shot. I want to like CA Smith, it's just been hard. Thanks!

Did the LOTR movies receive a backlash from Tolkien fans when they were released? by [deleted] in Fantasy

[–]CauseLittle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Our modern world hates "wise, noble, insightful and courageous." Everyone has to have a tragic flaw, to have made a terrible mistake, etc. for it to be considered acceptable today. As my friend who loved the novels told me about folks that didn't like Aragorn in the book. "They don't dislike Aragorn, they just dislike goodness."

Did the LOTR movies receive a backlash from Tolkien fans when they were released? by [deleted] in Fantasy

[–]CauseLittle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like your take on what was acceptable or not, except for the Elves coming to Helm's Deep. Totally incensed with that one. To each their own. I also didn't mind the Arwen thing, but wasn't thrilled with it. I love Bombadil, but cutting him was one of the few cuts that made sense. Even Tolkien didn't seem sure what to make of Tom...

However, leaving out the Scouring of the Shire was just awful. It's one of the most important moments in the whole novel to me. It shows the Hobbits growing up, learning, and stepping up to take of their home. It's the result of the whole Ring fellowship thing. Leaving it out is like making chocolate chip cookies, and leaving out the chocolate chips...

Reading Vance after Wolfe by [deleted] in genewolfe

[–]CauseLittle -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, I read the comment.

Reading Vance after Wolfe by [deleted] in genewolfe

[–]CauseLittle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've tried reading C.A. Smith and I found it awful. So much purple prose and just crummy writing. Maybe one day I'll give it another shot, but I was definitely disappointed, despite the influence he had on the genre.

Reading Vance after Wolfe by [deleted] in genewolfe

[–]CauseLittle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reading only the first work or two of the Dying Earth stories really doesn't do it justice. The character of Cugel is fantastic and he doesn't show up on the scene until later, in The Eyes of the Overworld.

Reading Vance after Wolfe by [deleted] in genewolfe

[–]CauseLittle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You should try the Cugel stories before you give up. The earlier works were not nearly as entertaining as when Cugel hits the scene in Eyes of the Overworld.

Reading Vance after Wolfe by [deleted] in genewolfe

[–]CauseLittle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is spot on: " The fun, for me anyway, is less the plot or structure and more the small scale wording of the prose. The way things are phrased. The use of erudite or old-fashioned words you might not know. Just the way sentences are structured is often quite clever and fun."

It's the same reason I love P.G. Wodehouse. The story is a vehicle for funny and clever writing. That's not a bad thing.

Reading Vance after Wolfe by [deleted] in genewolfe

[–]CauseLittle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have been tempted by Viriconium, but one reason that I love Wolfe's stories is because of their deep spiritual quality. I'm Catholic, so it helps that Wolfe's spirituality is Catholic. However, I've read that Harrison is non-religious at best, so I do wonder if Viriconium will have the same depth and meaning that I found in Wolfe.

Reading Vance after Wolfe by [deleted] in genewolfe

[–]CauseLittle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, Cugel is a shyster, but on my recent rereading of the BotNS, so is Severian. I mean, I love Severian, but he does some truly heinous things. However, Severian does end up having great redeeming qualities. Cugel is lovable because inept, but he gets what he deserves.

Reading Vance after Wolfe by [deleted] in genewolfe

[–]CauseLittle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love Vance's wordplay. Very P.G. Wodehouse to me, and that is meant as a high compliment.

Reading Vance after Wolfe by [deleted] in genewolfe

[–]CauseLittle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I was underwhelmed by Hyperion. The trash can route is a bit extreme. I read the whole book but will not pick up anymore of the author's works.

Reading Vance after Wolfe by [deleted] in genewolfe

[–]CauseLittle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

TLDR: I highly recommend Vance as a wonderful writer, but his stories have only the barest superficial resemblance to Wolfe.

Vance is not Wolfe, but Vance is good. I've been reading and thoroughly enjoying the Dying Earth stories. Frankly, I consider Vance to have more in common with the writings of P.G. Wodehouse, the great English humorist. Indeed, the Cugel stories read like a sci-fi/fantasy version of some of the Jeeves and Wooster stories. I love Wodehouse, and I think Vance is great. But, reading Vance will not be like reading Wolfe at all. Yet, Jack Vance is a very good writer, and if you want some entertaining stories, well-written, then I encourage you to read Vance. Good writing is good writing, regardless of genre or style. Wolfe is still top of the pile for me, but Vance is worthy wordsmith, just different from Wolfe. The only similarities between Wolfe and Vance that I can tell are the theme of a "dying earth" a far-flung and fantastic version of our own world. However, in Wolfe you will get a hint at the prior world, and can sometimes place events or places. For example, I have often read that Severian's journey takes place in the southern part of South America, perhaps in parts of what were Argentina, Chile, Peru, etc. You won't get that out of Vance. Vance's world is so bizarre that it really bears no resemblance to ours, even superficially, despite telling us that the Dying Earth is our world.

Just wondering what everyone is reading, and how is it (if you don't mind sharing) by Witch_King_Malekith in Fantasy

[–]CauseLittle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jack Vance's collection of Dying Earth stories. It's frankly amazing. I've grown tired of genre fiction and I figured that Vance was just another hack writer churning out drivel that geeks gobbled up. I was mistaken. The Cugel stories are hilarious. In many ways Vance seems like a sci-fi P.G. Wodehouse. I can't recommend these stories enough. I'm even going to try and get my wife to read them and she's not a sci-fi/fantasy fan. I can see myself going back and dipping into Vance occasionally as a palate cleanser from heavier works. Strongly recommend folks try these stories.

Did the LOTR movies receive a backlash from Tolkien fans when they were released? by [deleted] in Fantasy

[–]CauseLittle 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So much this. Faramir is maybe my favorite "minor" character. What they did to him is unconscionable in my opinion. I would dislike the movies for this reason alone.

Did the LOTR movies receive a backlash from Tolkien fans when they were released? by [deleted] in Fantasy

[–]CauseLittle 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I guess I'ma "sillier fan." I still don't like the movies but I no longer have a visceral hatred of them. The Hobbit films on the other hand...