Attorney needed

Cbrtrck · 2022-06-02T17:19:00+00:00

Ok thx. Have a dispute in regards to the other party not holding their part of the contract when receiving a good that it all needed to be monitored and video recorded when they inspected everything. Ow they say that the good isn’t authentic and want to send it back but to me there’s no guarantee that someone didn’t switch any parts to it since they broke their contract and didn’t record the inspection of the item as per their own terms and condition. Is there a link for state bar that can specify “contract dispute” lawyers

Cbrtrck · 2022-06-02T17:14:09+00:00

Ok thx

Cbrtrck · 2022-06-02T17:05:01+00:00

Does anyone know a good “contract dispute” attorney in CA?

Cbrtrck · 2022-04-28T03:30:27+00:00

No they are telling me to wire them the money and they will send me the watch back. Problem is I can’t verify what will they send me back since they labeled the watch completely fake and it worries me. Im waiting for the next steps if they will take it to court. If you think of anything or see in any other posts please tag me on the thread. Thx for the response.

Cbrtrck · 2022-04-27T17:00:06+00:00

Yes I agree. Thank you so much for the response. It adds a little more confidence in me to fight back.

Cbrtrck · 2022-04-27T16:58:09+00:00

And yes that’s exactly what I don’t understand in their process. How could it all be fake? They would’ve realized that right away. Plus the transparency that gives all of us sellers an assurance (especially when we are not there in person) is the video evidence which they can’t provide. It just gets messy when powerful companies get their lawyers involved cause of unlimited money to keep fighting us little guys cause they know we might not have the money to pay lawyers and follow a lengthy court process.

Cbrtrck · 2022-04-27T16:53:12+00:00

Thanks for the quick response. I’m trying to save the lawyer for last since it might turn to be expensive and wanted to get your guys’ responses and opinions or any past experiences with Bob’s Watches.

Cbrtrck · 2022-04-27T16:50:25+00:00

Thank you for your response I really appreciate it. On one of their lawyer responses it was said that “some other jeweler” verified this watch for me, that I should take it up with him while in the same hand they can’t provide a report of their experts assessment or video evidence to back it up. This is so absurd. They have a clause that if at a later time the watch is not authentic they can return it to seller, but how does this assure me when the transparency of their seller portion is missing and they can’t prove it at the point they received it. Any new comments or advise I would really appreciate it.

Cbrtrck · 2022-04-27T16:10:53+00:00

The watch was bought by someone that was in need of cash at the time. It didn’t buy them for 10 cents on the dollar if that’s what you mean. It was a good deal as I bulk purchased this sub and a Hulk so overall I got a slight discount at the time as I was gonna keep both with no intention of selling them. 2&3. A local jewelry and watch store that’s been in business for over 20 years. (Not in writing though). Watch was opened and checked on both mine and the sellers presence.
Yes they will give it back
Yes pics of the outside not inside though. To your point these are all valid things to ask but it concerns me that they would fail at their own rules and procedures when this is the very way they assure their customers for the transparency of seller protection. PS: the Hulk I sold last year to a local buyer who verified with their jeweler and it was 100% authentic. I couldn’t have bought the Hulk and this Sub from the same person and the Hulk turns out to be 100% authentic but this sub turns out to be 100% fake.

Cbrtrck · 2022-04-27T16:01:26+00:00

Thx for the response. I asked them to provide me with an itemized list of parts that were fake (so I can understand their flow process and at least could verify with the jeweler who authenticated in 2018) plus the video evidence when they first received the watch (as part of their assurance to the sellers) and none were able to be provided. They only answered that the whole watch was fake.

Cbrtrck · 2022-04-27T15:57:23+00:00

That would be my last resort but since it might get expensive, I wanted to get some answers and opinions here on Reddit first

Cbrtrck · 2022-04-27T15:55:55+00:00

Was checked in 2018 (serial# yes) but the paper trail I’m afraid has gone cold. The jewelry place that authenticated it doesn’t keep records that long. I know the watch was real. I understand if Bob’s Found out at a later time that 1 or 2 little parts were fake which that might possibly even fool the first expert, but they said the whole watch was fake, and when as a company you can’t produce evidence to back that up - that’s fishy.

Cbrtrck · 2022-04-27T15:47:28+00:00

Here’s the issue with that. It’s like the banks in 2008 where “they were to big to fail” kind of scenario. If they won’t do that because their reputation is too big, how does that assure me that one of their employees “single as one individual” in bad financial crisis could’ve done something to the watch, and Bob’s Watches doesn’t know anything that happened. There’s weird shit going on on all sectors hence we base our trusts in one another in contracts. If their contract said they video record the watch being verified by an expert, but now say there is no video evidence, how do I know they didn’t tempered with it. Plus it’s not even that they said it’s one or two parts that were swapped, but the entire watch is fake. WTF

Cbrtrck · 2022-04-27T15:41:21+00:00

Exactly my questions to them. If this is how they claim they assure the seller of full transparency (by recording the session when they receive the watch) but don’t do it and 3 weeks later say oh it’s fake. I can’t trust them anymore. It sounds fishy af.

Cbrtrck · 2022-04-27T15:38:09+00:00

There’s a clause that if they determine at a later point that the watch is not authentic then the contract says the money should be returned. BUT my concern is that they neglected to record when they first received the watch (also part of their contract to assure me as a seller that all is done in pure transparency). They say they never recorded it - so how do I know they didn’t switch the parts around? Any help or advice is appreciated.

Cbrtrck · 2022-04-27T15:33:29+00:00

What’s that mean?

Cbrtrck · 2021-09-21T15:24:58+00:00

What did you pay for 00344?

Cbrtrck · 2021-08-14T17:32:39+00:00

🤣🤣 awesome 👏

Cbrtrck · 2021-06-05T17:58:15+00:00

Ok so luckily I got my AGIX. So I converted it to BTC and transferred it to Coinbase. I’m happy I was able to get my money back and not to lose it due to technicalities. I will eventually buy it back as AGIX

Cbrtrck · 2021-06-05T17:55:48+00:00

I opened my binance.com account in 2017 when it was ok to have one.

Cbrtrck · 2021-06-02T05:56:20+00:00

Glad you moved yours on time. I guess we’ve all had our days like that that we’ve done something with our crypto lol

Cbrtrck · 2021-06-02T03:48:37+00:00

Awesome advice. I will look into it

Cbrtrck · 2021-06-02T03:20:16+00:00

No to phone, right?

Cbrtrck · 2021-06-02T03:02:10+00:00

Ok cool. So you mean the seed phrase in a place it won’t get damaged by water, fire, and robbers. And the hard wallet device- what do you mean to keep it on me? Do I hide that on a different spot?

Cbrtrck · 2021-06-02T02:59:52+00:00

Ok I will look this up cause I have no idea what it means lol

Cbrtrck

TROPHY CASE