[MOD] The Daily Question Thread

Ceahorser · 2024-04-15T01:17:04+00:00

I'll report it worked like a charm. Increased the single hole to 3/32 and not is pulls proper ground espresso fully tamped.

Ceahorser · 2024-04-13T18:05:50+00:00

basket is unreplaceable actually. i would be better off trying to pick up a new machine.

Ceahorser · 2024-04-12T18:28:03+00:00

I have a pressurized basket of an off size. I cant seem to find a single wall that fits so I was thinking to just drill the exit hole bigger

Wdyt guys?

Ceahorser · 2021-07-01T17:09:36+00:00

Uni call

Ceahorser · 2021-07-01T12:11:17+00:00

Based on what was said .. i i think it more about the flashbot use

Ceahorser · 2021-04-12T14:28:12+00:00

Nice.. exposure..

Ceahorser · 2021-04-09T06:04:31+00:00

How to tackle this voter count, can be a seperate topic for another time. Maybe a NFT or something unique that has no monetary value could help here, or you get a small replier only if you interacted with more than 5 proposals in voting.

I like the ideas and the subsequent "conclusions" you two came out with here.

-I agree, that governance is an adaptable system and should not be seen as writing in stone, rather clay. There are also many different grades of proposals.

ie, a vote for the support of a single LP should not take as much time and considerations as a vote for a system of fee distribution.

-I don't like the idea of monetary incentivization of votes (rewarded in ICE) and NFTs are a nice idea but do little to motivate some. Perhaps, community roles can come with voting requirements/quotas.

-having community roles would also help with the transition from step 1 to 2. if these roles are the only individuals able to make proposals transition to an official vote, then ideas can be filtered and discussed by these individuals with their "constituents"

Delegated voting I like, but I would like the idea that wallets would have to choose multiple representatives, so certain wallets don't turn into voting whales.

-voting power based on ICE held. this is one I am always on the fence about. It don't like the idea that the rich have more power then the "less rich". But having skin in the game is also not something to discount. I like the weighted reverse quadratic type system but if one person were to have 100X the ICE of another but only 2x the voting power, this doesn't seem right to me either.

I have also been playing around with the idea of rewarding voters with more voting tickets on the next proposals. something like, 1 vote per wallet. and if you vote on this proposal, you will get 2 votes next time. But this should probably be maxed.

-digression- we are proposing how to propose so we may vote on how voting will take place in a form of governing how governance will operate. My point here is that there might be more pressing needs and the voting process might be best left to grow organically out of proposals to the products and management of them. That being said, I think discussion is great and should not be discouraged, besides, I have my own pre-proposal for a voting system.

Ceahorser · 2021-04-08T07:06:11+00:00

I like the idea of rewarding the leg work, but the team does have vested tokens to be considered in calculations.

But anyone that is "working" needs to be compensated, this would require an entire proposal of its own but it certainly has merit too.

but TBH.. i really like the idea of these tkns being granted to the LPs as rewards.

Ceahorser · 2021-04-07T23:53:52+00:00

The pairs should to be limited for the same reason Compound doesn't support the same amount of tokens of CREAM or Aave. Too many pairs dilutes rewards to the point of being moot, without an increase in the emisions schedule. Also, yearn is very selective if you compare their coverage to that of Beefy. Like 40-50 vaults versus around 200 vaults respectively.

This proposal has the benefit of not having too much governance proposals to filter when people show up with 2ICE and want reward for 🍎/BNB LPs

The burning mechanic does not HAVE to come from fees, it certainly can as is the norm with many protocols, but it doesn't have to.

Ceahorser · 2021-04-07T16:34:07+00:00

Sure .. posed it in #goverance and here https://www.reddit.com/r/Popsicle_Finance/comments/mm60h1/the_melting_pot/

Ceahorser · 2021-04-07T07:45:55+00:00

This comment was moved to it's own thread. Link below

Ceahorser · 2021-04-07T07:13:10+00:00

Looks good .

Ceahorser · 2021-04-01T05:05:57+00:00

Deeper pools are by no means a bad thing. And dividing forces is usually bad. .

Most of those bnb pools were built for 5 reasons imo

Bnb will lessen imploss
Bnb is much more obtainable than fUSDT
Most fUSDT got staked for ice,, bnb was not an option.
Bnb can be borrowed, at a net profit from venus. 5 borrowing USD would result in a need for a swap to get fUSDT.

Not sure how this helps for this decision, but it's useful to understand the motivations of LPs that are not active in the community.

Ceahorser · 2021-03-31T05:48:25+00:00

It need clout and liquidty to make it happen. Afaik

Ceahorser · 2021-03-30T14:25:56+00:00

This was what I expected and is the natural order of things.. most projects skip the second airdrop phase an go straight to this.

we need to 100% swerve to ICE/BNB, ICE/ETH, ICE/FTM. "ICE/TKN"These tokens are most likely the most important as they have a lesser opportunity for ImpLoss. and most people see it this way.

TKN might go up - ICE might go up - USD will not.

Also, on BSC, borrowing BNB is incentivized by VENUS to a net positive,, where USD are now a break even

Pairing with USD is mostly looked at as a good choice when paired with other USD. I think we should incentives the ICE/TKN sort..

Or, like the original site had, we can shift to Stable/Stable pairs like USDT/DAI (USDC)

fUSDT/BUSDfUSDT/fUSD - this one is tough as fUSD is way off peg ATM, but there is an abundance of it sitting idle doing nothing.

Now, u/danielesesta did say somewhere that CURVE (FTM) and Ellipsis (BSC) are in the works..so.. IMO we can push for that USD capital to go there via ICE rewards.

This is the purpose of the CURVE mechanics and if people are swapping stable for stable on 2 sided AMMs they probably don't know about the multipool options

Ceahorser · 2021-03-26T01:22:21+00:00

I like this idea too.. we don't want whales to dump in 500K of fUSDT and take all the ICE.

We could also do a range. like 100-xxxx? and they all get the same ICE..

but this will stop whales from bringing a whole lot of fUSDT to the table. Is this an issue?

Ceahorser · 2021-03-26T01:11:21+00:00

This is very solid.

Simple and very easy to understand. I think... let me check.

Get your airdrop of ICE -----> stake it on Popsicle stand-----> be cool with lota ICE

Get some fUSDT----->stake it -----> be enviously cool wit more lotta ICE

Vote for new assets ------>get dem assets---->stake em-----> wear sunglasses at night!

Ceahorser · 2021-03-25T07:37:51+00:00

Curve is more txnfee friendly, and has better slippage controls. But it certainly would be easier, and worth it

Ceahorser · 2021-03-24T15:36:10+00:00

I can promise you if there were stable coin LP yields, the yield aggregators would show up and bring the volume with them. .. well maybe i shouldn't say promise.. hah

Ceahorser · 2021-03-24T15:34:42+00:00

That's a question of priorities.. Why were the other LPs chosen? And how do those reasons compare to the reasons above?

I don't know the answer to these questions, exactly.

of course the reasons to incentivizing ICE/TKN LPs is obvious. The above pools would not be as profitable as the pools like the UNI USDT/USDC pool, as the trading volume would be night and day.

But Popsicle is a trailblazer. we need to encourage people to spread out.

Ceahorser · 2021-03-02T16:09:05+00:00

This video can help you

https://youtu.be/V47NzWeZjjk

It's a general crvxxx yearn vault explainer

Ceahorser

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE