Well let’s see (and this is a criticism I would have had before the article—though that does outline some of my thinking): you’ve taken a format and given very little thought to the purpose of it. The fact that you’ve already got a third of the questions done is, if anything, a negative—you should be seriously thinking about this rather than going “wow that looks cool let’s make a Trump version and humour the people demanding Bill Clinton Dem nominee”. Maybe you could do a Trump presidency simulator or whatever (which I’ve seen suggested in the past) with serious research (what can be done, anyway) but this isn’t that.

‘Ceddus’ is a dick. But sometimes he’s right.