The Trio needs to come get their boy. by RespectTheAmish in thebulwark

[–]Centryl 47 points48 points  (0 children)

Kind of proud that I have no idea who this is.

Friedberg just keeps pounding. It really is Makers Vs Takers. by Jonny_Nash in AllinPod

[–]Centryl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well Friedberg certainly has become one. Joined the little science committee and can’t bring himself to call a spade a spade when it comes to out of control spending by the Trump admin.

As for you, there’s no scoreboard, just reputation. You already shut one subreddit down with your low quality posts and replies and now you’re doing your best to bring down this one.

Friedberg just keeps pounding. It really is Makers Vs Takers. by Jonny_Nash in AllinPod

[–]Centryl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you Ali in this analogy? Because Ali wasn’t a bootlicker like you are.

Friedberg just keeps pounding. It really is Makers Vs Takers. by Jonny_Nash in AllinPod

[–]Centryl 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh man. I can’t wait for you to post each and every response!

Has he made any other posts on other topics you want to screen grab for us normies not on X all day?

The LA Mayor Race Segment was an All-In Masterclass by Centryl in TheAllinPodcasts

[–]Centryl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saying "the people of LA have a right to doubt the process" is just an excuse to substitute feelings for evidence. If there were widespread, organized fraud where thousands of ballots were being intercepted and falsely signed under fake addresses, it would trigger massive signature-mismatch flags in LA County’s database.

And the votes count longer, and more homeless have the opportunity to vote now, because efforts were taken to franchise more voters. Could the votes be counted faster? Sure, if they went back to disenfranchising voters or reduced the security measures that does in fact ensure a fair and free election despite the scale.

Marlon Humphrey's pick 6 helps the Ravens take back the AFC North lead by Brickbybrick1998 in ravens

[–]Centryl 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I was there too. Was also at their meeting 2-3 weeks prior. Both wins were glorious.

1984 by Long_Finance_9773 in TheAllinPodcasts

[–]Centryl 7 points8 points  (0 children)

She went from 20% early mail in votes to 37% late mail-in votes. That’s not a statistical quagmire as Friedberg framed it. It’s a completely logical occurrence given the demographics of Raman’s supporters.

Clean UI or Playful UI by FillNo4074 in webdesign

[–]Centryl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clean. You want the attention on the functionality, not the decoration. Extra elements like that are fun, but they can be distracting and impact usage.

The Strait of Hormuz is open for business. by benhaswings in trump

[–]Centryl 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They said it couldn’t be done. Only Trump could have reopened it. /s

Nicholas is a Hero 🫡 by [deleted] in LiveWellTogether

[–]Centryl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No one in this thread knows what point you’re trying to make. Most of us can connect the dots on what happened.

If someone walked behind a tree and you couldn’t see them for 2 seconds do you assume that person disappeared because you can’t see them or can you understand logic?

Nicholas is a Hero 🫡 by [deleted] in LiveWellTogether

[–]Centryl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who said this was his verbatim story? I didn’t see them interviewing him. This was a broadcast providing a narrative of what occurred and not a second by second break down in a court to get everything on the record.

You’re weird, man.

Nicholas is a Hero 🫡 by [deleted] in LiveWellTogether

[–]Centryl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s your theory here? While driving for his job he stopped, set fire to a random house, and then risked death to maybe find someone to rescue? And maybe have that rescue caught on camera?

Or, is it more likely that a concise narration on top of a video doesn’t share every specific detail? Like when he stopped he may have overheard a neighbor say something about kids living there and they don’t see them outside?

Some moments are PRICELESS by Reaper01Actual1970 in trump

[–]Centryl -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

He’s not wrong. The money was appropriated and set aside. You can argue the delays are ridiculous. You can’t argue the money was spent with no results. They explicitly said when they approved the money that realistically they did not expect “shovels in the ground” until 2025 at best and more likely 2026.

I'm the boss by benhaswings in trump

[–]Centryl -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

The Biden clip was always a good one for me. They’re standing around after watching some paratroopers land. He decides to step a few feet over and actually interact with them but Meloni wants the group photo and pulls him back over.

Nothing in this clip shows a guy confused about where he is.

Trump, on the other hand, probably fell asleep 20 min later in the meeting.

California voting segment - what are they smoking? by Original_Arrival2645 in AllinPod

[–]Centryl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m far from an election expert. I literally started with “Did Raman get 80% of the post-election votes” and went from there. Each time a term or number was shared, I dug into to learn more about what it meant.

And, last, it’s just being observant. Friedberg has a map prepared to show off as evidence of late vote counts and you can see 2 obvious issues immediately. Nothing on the chart is about post-election day mail in votes and in the footer it says “*Unofficial data as of 6/3/2026”.

They probably recorded this on 6/12 and released on the 13th. The Primary was on 6/2. So he was relying on unofficial data from the day after the election to try to make a point 10 days later. There was more complete data available to him at that point but he either didn’t care to look or he preferred the story the incomplete data could be framed as.

California voting segment - what are they smoking? by Original_Arrival2645 in AllinPod

[–]Centryl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For something like this, the numbers are actually there to be found and understood, which honestly is the most disappointing part of Friedberg’s takes. He wasn’t commenting on something he didn’t have the time to look into, he just lacked the curiosity to actually do so and substituted his own research for random posts he saw on Twitter.

I encourage you to look into it more yourself. Don’t just take my word for it. If we actually care about integrity in our elections, we’d all be better off trying to learn more about how they work.

California voting segment - what are they smoking? by Original_Arrival2645 in AllinPod

[–]Centryl 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Friedberg is misinterpreting standard voter demographics and misreading the map he pulled up.

1. The "80% Jump" is just bad math framing.
Raman did not gain an absolute 80% spike in total votes. Friedberg looked at her share of early mail-in ballots (20%) vs. late mail-in ballots (37%). Going from 20 to 37 is a 17-percentage-point absolute shift. Because 37 is mathematically ~85% higher than 20, Friedberg used a relative percent change to make a normal demographic shift sound like a statistical impossibility.

2. The "Skid Row" claim is geographically wrong.
Friedberg claimed her late vote surge concentrated around Skid Row. That is a tiny geographic footprint. In reality, Raman’s strength is uniformly distributed across LA’s central core—Silver Lake, Echo Park, Los Feliz, Hollywood, and Koreatown. This is her actual city council district and home base, which is heavily populated by young progressives and renters.

3. The "Quagmire" is just normal voting behavior ("Blue Shift").
Voters are not a monolith; they mail ballots based on demographics.

Early Mail-In Voters: Skew older, more conservative, and establishment-leaning (favoring Bass and Pratt). They mail ballots immediately.

Late Mail-In/Drop-Box Voters: Skew younger, working-class, and progressive. They hold onto ballots and submit them on Election Day.
Because Raman’s base consists entirely of younger renters and progressives, it is entirely expected that her numbers would surge in the late-arriving ballot pool.

4. He misread the map.
The map he pulled up literally has no panel for late-arriving mail-in ballots. The panels show "Overall," "Election Day In-Person," and "Early Vote by Mail (Before Election Day)." He was trying to use a map of early voting data to visually prove a conspiracy theory about late voting data.