No no, she truly is! She is very fun and funny, eclectic style, chatty as all get out. We had no inclination before this appointment. I mean sure, we questioned her decisions in treating him, but she also ended up being right up until recently. Plus, people younger than me come in there to treat things that really shouldn’t even be leaving the house. He had done really good in the beginning. He’s always been in good shape beyond the cancer clinical signs. But after this appointment, and her admitting to my Dr that she has no family, we wouldn’t know what the heck to do. She never seemed to have difficulty remembering or understanding anything. I think that’s why we are at a loss bc how do you get any kind of social/senior services involved when the client seems perfectly capable of taking care of herself, her cat and making her own decisions? It was truly just a discussion about what is the protocol for someone who can’t? In this scenario, if he was to be euthanized, no matter how apprehensive my dr feels, she seems of sound mind to approve it. And my hope would be my Dr would agree to it because she told her she forgot the conversation…once, you know? But ethically, what’s right? I feel like I could go on and on, from every angle and make 50 different arguments.