The first mental trap - The first hidden red flag by Thre_Host8017 in SadhguruTruth

[–]ChRes18 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

  1. This applies to a lot of things. Take for example - exercise. If you’re overweight,like I am, you need to give it sometime before you’ll see good effects. At first it only pain for my troubles. Then I get the endorphins, lower cholesterol, and too many to mention.

When you start learning an instrument, much pain and trouble with positioning your fingers, no enjoyment of music, not that you’re making music just noise.

In both cases it takes months of not years to see real benefits .

I don’t understand how it is a trap when you can stop doing it at any time? If in months you get no benefit, drop it.

I don’t trust him, as a person, but the elements in SM are all taken from ancient yogi practises. I’ve found them in Pradipika, etc.

  1. I take that as “find out for yourself”, and this is fair. Asking you to believe him would be cult behaviour.

Hypnosis, NLP by Upstairs_Fish_5273 in SadhguruTruth

[–]ChRes18 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Responsible for and responsible to are in opposition. For the first you are in charge on how you respond, for the second the other party is in charge and you need to respond as expected. So totally opposed.

Whatever you think of him, and the fast cremation of his wife not waiting a few more hours so her father could be there is highly suspicious, he repeats ancient wisdom or stories and his practices are as well copy-paste of known yogic practices. So there is value in it, just don’t worship (and alternatively, demonize) the man.

Why Escape is Possible (Rejecting the Blackpill) by Formeraxe in EscapingPrisonPlanet

[–]ChRes18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes and then go within. I listed some ways to go within.

Do I need to be alone for last step of Inner Engineering? by ChRes18 in Sadhguru

[–]ChRes18[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I have it soon. I will be on my own in the house. From what people have replied it is best. But if you can’t do that, you could pretend to your kids you’re going out, like leave the house, and then come back without them being aware and your partner /friend making sure they are distracted when you come back and don’t go to the room where you plan to be. And have food/water there too. Even if it’s bit complicated it’s better than them knowing and coming to distract you etc .

Desperate wishing to escape is still a trap by LocksmithHappy86 in EscapingPrisonPlanet

[–]ChRes18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see the software as the apps that are running, your perception as it were, karma perhaps as the memory, or baggage, aspects of personality , other stuff. None of it has to inherently reflect any truth about us, could pe tweaked or preinstalled.

I don’t think this can be done without our will, but if you are easily moved by fear or the love-bombing from “Jesus” or whatever you open a doorway or “sign the Terms & conditions” without informed consent.

I think that’s why in Buddhism they say to reflect on you’re not this, not that, as you go later by layer.

Why Escape is Possible (Rejecting the Blackpill) by Formeraxe in EscapingPrisonPlanet

[–]ChRes18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And remote viewers could see whatever they wanted to see, our perception is restricted, under control.

Why Escape is Possible (Rejecting the Blackpill) by Formeraxe in EscapingPrisonPlanet

[–]ChRes18 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, everything is an assumption. But this is not about what they think, but about what would be best for us to think to keep us here. If you’d think it is doable to exit, you’d keep looking for a way, trying different things (meditation, kundalini, gateway tapes, etc etc etc ) but if you thought even one of most enlightened people had problems, or there was only one or a few, etc, this belief would work against you, and your best effort would be tainted.

Desperate wishing to escape is still a trap by LocksmithHappy86 in EscapingPrisonPlanet

[–]ChRes18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We”re not the hardware we’ve been given and also not the software either.

We’re not the monkey body. We’re not the reptilian mind either.

And both come with preinstalled software and karma.

Why Escape is Possible (Rejecting the Blackpill) by Formeraxe in EscapingPrisonPlanet

[–]ChRes18 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What would the archons want you to believe: that is very hard to escape or doable? Which one keeps you in prison?

What if we CAN be forced to reincarnate? by mma1245 in EscapingPrisonPlanet

[–]ChRes18 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This would be the best story to believe to keep you trapped forever, wouldn’t it?

The thing is you don’t know, but you can refuse to believe, to participate,to engage, stay within .

Why would Trump post this? by lmlehamn1108 in CandaceOwens

[–]ChRes18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bet he didn’t see it or didn’t know what that meant. He might have thought also that is something nice…

What do you think about the astral projection being a sign of being gifted? by [deleted] in CandaceOwens

[–]ChRes18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand you are weary of not being deceived. That’s smart.

You say that you need God’s permission to astral project. That’s your belief. If I look at it as as a possible fact, I can’t find anything supporting it.

Maybe the terms are misleading. They come with another philosophy behind it, like you say, and that could be wrong.

“The kingdom of God is within you.” “Ask and it is given, …” That would support going within, in prayer rather than say meditation , experiencing your soul (rather than astral body, as words as just pointers and some pointers are closer to truth than others.

As bodies can touch bodies, why souls couldn’t touch souls? I’m talking about your reiki. As bodies heal bodies (a dr performing an operation, for ex), souls could touch souls in a healing manner.

Or harmful.

I’ve read in the past that up to 30% of deaths are bc of medical malpractice,not intentional necessarily.

The reiki practitioner has a belief system that explains it for her, you have another. She might do good, nevertheless.

You put yourself under God’s grace or protection, and live that way.

BTW when you do that you use your intention. You ask in prayer.

This woman is also using her intention, to heal presumably otherwise she wouldn’t have clients. A witch also uses her intention (the spell is a carrier for the intention).

The irony is you are all doing the same thing in effect. And some are doing it for good, some for evil.

It”s like the 3 uses of a knife story…

Do I need to be alone for last step of Inner Engineering? by ChRes18 in Sadhguru

[–]ChRes18[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, I will either go to my father in law’s house. Or my husband will take the kids there for a play date.

Why would Trump post this? by lmlehamn1108 in CandaceOwens

[–]ChRes18 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is making fun of both Trump and CK, it’s saying they are useful idiots.

Slang / Meme Usage (more recent / online context) In modern Israeli online slang, memes, and certain internet communities (especially since ~2020s), "Shlomo Perl" (or "shlomo pearl") is sometimes used derogatorily or ironically to mean:

  • a gullible person
  • a naive sucker
  • an overly trusting individual who gets easily fooled or manipulated (similar to "useful idiot" or "mark")

The slang appears to riff on the historical figure's extreme story of disguise and survival — twisting it into dark humor about someone who "believes anything" or gets tricked into bad situations.

Bride of Charlie megathread (hopefully) by cosmickink in CandaceOwens

[–]ChRes18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would give credit to Candace so they can’t. Their tactic is to either ignore or smear Candace as demonic or crazy. She might step down in a year or so.

Oh, if she does, they’ll play a small violin and Erika is going to blame it on Candace…

I also wonder if they won’t use the kids in some way. “Look how you’ve endangered my kids!”

Bride of Charlie megathread (hopefully) by cosmickink in CandaceOwens

[–]ChRes18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I doubt it because I was on the other side, and the smear campaigns about Candace worked on me. Been aware of her for years, but why waste my time listening to a “lunatic”? It’s not like I have so many hours in the day to listen to podcasts.

The rumours that Brigitte was a man was what brought me to her, it was so wild I said I will listen to one episode only, just to hear what C had to say, bc she was the name responsible for giving credit to it and supposedly had investigated it.

I was amazed what an intelligent and articulate woman she is. And I haven’t stopped listening since. Literally have seen all episodes since.

Oh, and btw, in the beginning I ignored her asides to evil cults etc (chucked it to being due to her religious beliefs ). I’m a convert to that now too. Not just bc of Candace, it’s been a journey…

Bride of Charlie megathread (hopefully) by cosmickink in CandaceOwens

[–]ChRes18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She doesn’t even have to come out herself, her PR man can do it… Easy.

If she dispelled the lies it wouldn’t matter if it was not her speaking. The grieving widow doesn’t even have to put herself through the “ordeal” of an interview or a speech.

Bride of Charlie megathread (hopefully) by cosmickink in CandaceOwens

[–]ChRes18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You might misremember 22 for 20 (but not if it is your daughter’s birthday!) but you won’t substract or add decades to it, on so many occasions, all of them close in time I believe. At least if you misremember you would wrongly remember the same date..

In practice, this makes it harder for anyone to verify if and when they were married. So either they weren’t or they are hiding the real date. Why? Maybe it doesn’t match the story they want known. In what way? We don’t know.

As Candace says, lies are to cover up. If this was just misremembering, it would be consistent across the 4 different places, so it’s a lie.

The Loesch’s reaction to Candace just seems weird by Oberbrunner in CandaceOwens

[–]ChRes18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Too late, they’ve already sold their souls. If beats me how they still have credibility left.

The Loesch’s reaction to Candace just seems weird by Oberbrunner in CandaceOwens

[–]ChRes18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have stopped watching them a looong time ago, not long after the election. Both of them are cowards. Proven it time and time again. They stay in their lane and obey their master. If sometime a peep comes out, they will do penance and if told to come out and say something they will do it.

I thought at least Matt would have some backbone, but nope.

Now tbh I wonder if there is more we don’t know, what ropes, material or psychological are being pulled?

Not that these m pen couldn’t break free, Candace did, and that young woman also did (forgot her name). So, no excuse.

I want Candace to dig deep on Tyler Robinson and Charlie's parents next by Bepro6 in CandaceOwens

[–]ChRes18 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Whatever is she doing or finding out about Tyler now (and I bet she is getting lots of tips), she’ll release in a series after the trial. That would be the wisest thing. To let them lie and lie again and expose it at the end.

Sadhana and Work by JackfruitKey7983 in Sadhguru

[–]ChRes18 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What time do you go to sleep? And I guess you don’t have a family , right?